What I'm saying is that I've learned not to bail out too quickly. If a show doesn't improve, I'll lose interest, but I've seen enough shows start out weak due to network pressures and then get better -- and I've seen enough good shows die because audiences gave up on them too quickly -- that I'm willing to be more patient. There certainly are shows that lose me right off the bat; Cult bored me so much that I didn't even watch the second episode, even though its female lead was devastatingly gorgeous, and the recent Ironside remake lost me in its first minute. But if I see potential in a show, I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt.
Where this show is concerned, I see hints that there's a potentially interesting arc building, and that there will be some worthwhile questions raised and ethical gray areas explored. Given all that ABC has invested in this show, the producers may be having to keep the early episodes nice and safe and uncontroversial to appease the executives, but hopefully they'll manage to push the boundaries further as the show goes on. I do hope that happens soon, though.
Her birth name is Chloe Wang. Chloe seems to be a very popular name in this generation, both for real people and fictional characters.
Where this show is concerned, I see hints that there's a potentially interesting arc building, and that there will be some worthwhile questions raised and ethical gray areas explored. Given all that ABC has invested in this show, the producers may be having to keep the early episodes nice and safe and uncontroversial to appease the executives, but hopefully they'll manage to push the boundaries further as the show goes on. I do hope that happens soon, though.
What's with the name "Chloe Bennet" anyway? Sounds like some kind of Smallville/Heroes fusion.
Her birth name is Chloe Wang. Chloe seems to be a very popular name in this generation, both for real people and fictional characters.