I've seen enough advance promotional material for the show that I've mostly learned the names by now. I needed a reminder on which one was Fitz and which was Simmons, but I've got it now.
Odd ones are easier to pick up than common ones.That's how I am with every show. Sometimes I'm amazed at how people can pick up names, especially the odd ones, so quickly.![]()
Odd ones are easier to pick up than common ones.That's how I am with every show. Sometimes I'm amazed at how people can pick up names, especially the odd ones, so quickly.![]()
![]()
Odd ones are easier to pick up than common ones.That's how I am with every show. Sometimes I'm amazed at how people can pick up names, especially the odd ones, so quickly.![]()
![]()
Agreed. "Myka" is easier to remember than "Pete." At least in my experience.
Although I loved it on Family Guy when Lois' dad says "I'm going to go watch Medium! Medium with save the day! Go-oooooooooooo-ooooooooooo-ooooo Medium!"
Putting on my editor's hat for a minute, it's amazing how many otherwise sensible writers put characters named Lora, Linda, and Lenore in the same book. Or maybe Dave, Dan, and Donald.
Do not do this! I actually keep lists of the characters in my books just to make sure the names don't sound too much alike.
And I admit I usually refer to the hero of GRIMM as "Grimm" even though that's not actually his name. He's technically a Grimm, not named Grimm, but who the heck ever thinks of him as "Burkholtz"?
Game of Thrones has 3 Roberts, for example, (King Robert, Robb Stark and Robert Arryn, though the latter became Robyn for the TV show) and there is an Osha and an Asha at different stages, as well as various Brandons, Jeynes etc. His attitude is that we all know different people with the same name in real life and distinguish them from each other, so the intelligent reader ought to be able to do the same.
His attitude is that we all know different people with the same name in real life and distinguish them from each other, so the intelligent reader ought to be able to do the same..
^ Yeah, I just thought it was interesting to compare such different perspectives from you and him, given that I've enjoyed writing by both of you!
Greg Cox said:Gene Wolfe tends to demand a greater degree of concentration and attention from his readers.
Meanwhile, just to steer this thread back OT, Stan Lee liked alliterative names (Peter Parker, Reed Richards, Bruce Banner, Sue Storm, etc.) because he thought they were easier to remember.
Meanwhile, just to steer this thread back OT, Stan Lee liked alliterative names (Peter Parker, Reed Richards, Bruce Banner, Sue Storm, etc.) because he thought they were easier to remember.
Except even he sometimes forgot them in the early days and wrote scripts referring to Peter Palmer and Bob Banner.
Meanwhile, just to steer this thread back OT, Stan Lee liked alliterative names (Peter Parker, Reed Richards, Bruce Banner, Sue Storm, etc.) because he thought they were easier to remember.
Meanwhile, just to steer this thread back OT, Stan Lee liked alliterative names (Peter Parker, Reed Richards, Bruce Banner, Sue Storm, etc.) because he thought they were easier to remember.
Is that why peope in real life name children things like Phillip Phillips, Richard Richards, John Johnson and the like? That's always boggled my mind.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.