Star Trek has always been our future.
Not with the way humans are today...
Star Trek has always been our future.
People say that and I go why not? Trek has humanity go through some terrible times before joining together. I don't for one second believe we are more divided, even if we are still struggling. I do believe we have worl to do but it comes down to our choices.Not with the way humans are today...
People say that and I go why not? Trek has humanity go through some terrible times before joining together. I don't for one second believe we are more divided, even if we are still struggling. I do believe we have worl to do but it comes down to our choices.
Indeed. While there were initial divisions in the fanbase over TNG and Enterprise, almost six years on since the release of Discovery there remains a firm division between those who accept it and those who consider it along with Strange New Worlds as belonging in a separate universe from the one TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT takes place in and it's hard to see this changing anytime soon.Unfortunately the Star Trek fanbase is heavily divided.
So there's people who are right, and there's people that are wrong.Indeed. While there were initial divisions in the fanbase over TNG and Enterprise, almost six years on since the release of Discovery there remains a firm division between those who accept it and those who consider it along with Strange New Worlds as belonging in a separate universe from the one TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT takes place in and it's hard to see this changing anytime soon.
I don't see why it needs to change. Why not just enjoy it and celebrate mutual enjoyment?Indeed. While there were initial divisions in the fanbase over TNG and Enterprise, almost six years on since the release of Discovery there remains a firm division between those who accept it and those who consider it along with Strange New Worlds as belonging in a separate universe from the one TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT takes place in and it's hard to see this changing anytime soon.
After The Cage/DISCO and before TOS. How is this a question?My amount of objections to SNW would drop down if it clarified its place in continuity. It
I don't care, they get to set the rules they want. I honestly don't blame since it derails so many threads here since some people can't handle minor changes to aesthetics.For example, the Daystrom Reddit outright bans people for suggesting an in-universe explanation for DISCOVERY and SNW being ahem so different to everything else is a multiverse. And r/startrek of course heavily policed comments about the implications of the USS New Jersey.
So you think those divisions disappeared? Folks were complaining about ENT up to beyond the last episode. .Indeed. While there were initial divisions in the fanbase over TNG and Enterprise, almost six years on since the release of Discovery there remains a firm division between those who accept it and those who consider it along with Strange New Worlds as belonging in a separate universe from the one TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT takes place in and it's hard to see this changing anytime soon.
There's definitely different silos. One thing that really surprised me about about returning to this BBS was how many hard core fans were pro-DISCOVERY. I haven't seen that reflected in, say, the YouTube space or some of the dedicated Star Trek lore websites. But general social polarization has been translated into popular culture, so I can see the "why"...Indeed. While there were initial divisions in the fanbase over TNG and Enterprise, almost six years on since the release of Discovery there remains a firm division between those who accept it and those who consider it along with Strange New Worlds as belonging in a separate universe from the one TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY/ENT takes place in and it's hard to see this changing anytime soon.
Just speaking for myself, I consider the differences to be far more than just minor changes to aesthetics.I don't care, they get to set the rules they want. I honestly don't blame since it derails so many threads here since some people can't handle minor changes to aesthetics.
Okay. I'm just going to continue to enjoy the shows. You do you.Just speaking for myself, I consider the differences to be far more than just minor changes to aesthetics.
I’m not sure you’ve entirely grasped my meaning.And we have a winner.
Amidst all the silly excuses you people came up with to explain this, this here makes the most sense.
Though, it is questionable to base the whole premise of these series around such a flawed concept.... assuming of course this involves Discovery characters.
It may not, and be a clean break from what has come before.
Enjoy!Okay. I'm just going to continue to enjoy the shows. You do you.
YouTube and it's comments sections are a wretched hive of scum and villainy and should not be taken as any kind of barometer of popularity.the YouTube space
The algorithm rewards negative attention, so it's in the best interest to hate anything that's trending since it leads to more comments and reactions. It's why so many channels are just about trashing Marvel movies or Star Wars. They may not actually have an opinion on it, but pretending that you hate it can pay off.YouTube and it's comments sections are a wretched hive of scum and villainy and should not be taken as any kind of barometer of popularity.
I thought a bit before replying and while I agree that those would be the majority reactions, I don't believe they will be the only reactions. I agree that it has to get worse before it gets better, bu that is the nature of human change. Behaviors don't just change without a substantial reevaluation of how one meets one needs. From a group standpoint there has to be willingness to at least acknowledge the other side as people before we can even start to talking solving the problems.There's going to be no in between, unfortunately, because everyone seems to want to deal in absolutes. A vast majority of people don't know how to agree to disagree anymore.
Unless we can sue for these damages I'm really convinced that both of these fan bases have a misguided notion of what damaged actually means.Meanwhile the old Star Trek vs Star Wars has shifted into debating which franchise has been more damaged post-Abrams.
Indeed. It's an unearned platform. It as a measuring point for anything is odd, to be fair.YouTube and it's comments sections are a wretched hive of scum and villainy and should not be taken as any kind of barometer of popularity.
There's of course a school of thought that argues ENT is a product of the change in the timeline caused by the Enterprise E travelling from the 24th century and not a true prequel to TOS.So you think those divisions disappeared? Folks were complaining about ENT up to beyond the last episode. .
Trek has inspired entire school districts.There's of course a school of thought that argues ENT is a product of the change in the timeline caused by the Enterprise E travelling from the 24th century and not a true prequel to TOS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.