• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Starfleet Academy Coming to P+

THERE ARE FOUR KLINGON TYPES.
BhmNnb7.gif
 
If nobody's going to sign anything can I at least get my Subway card punched so I can get my free 6-inch sub, bag of chips and medium soda?
 
TOS is one of the greatest television series ever created by anybody and anywhere in the world. But those officers wouldn't last terribly long in, say, the real life U.S. Navy chain of command. Not without a lot of reprimands for inappropriate behavior.
 
And McCoy was still a prejudiced grump all the way up to age 137. 71 years after he last served with Jim Kirk and Spock he was still making disparaging remarks about Vulcans because, well, fortysomething grouch becomes far grouchier man approaching 140.
 
Honestly, the series the legacy/continuity subset of fans really have to fear is SNW. The tone / continuity is all off, but it appeals to normies the way the Abramsverse did. Why try keeping up on 50+ years of continuity and follow up on a plethora of already established lore when you can just re-reboot TOS?

I don't find the SNW crew to be believable as professionals, again the evil verisimilitude. Continuity? I guess that's in the eye of the beholder... but why would the ship be refitted to be small and less technologically advanced after the Spock/Number One short, then refitted to be oversized again after "The Cage", then shrunk down afterwards? Lester in "Turnabout Intruder" is an unreliable narrator. Women on the bridge is effectively a deleted scene and doesn't feature in "The Menagerie". Chapel though really should be more in keeping with the TOS character, if not, just create a new one.
kiE1mwS.gif
 
And it's tolerable to differing amounts in different mediums.
Depends on the individual. Clearly we each have different thresholds. But ultimately, it’s up to the creators to do what they want (totally within their rights, though it doesn’t come with a guarantee of success) and for the audience to decide if it likes the results (with no right of satisfaction).
 
The inter-continuity is a lie. The parts if the lore that really matter isn't a model, a costume or a set.
Again it worked well enough for a substantial portion of the fanbase at least until ENT, and ENT lasted long enough to fix many of the initial complaints. It's not just a few people on a BBS that take issue... Doug Drexler has brought it up several times, and even Terry Matalas talked about meeting Akiva Goldsman for PICARD season 2 and asking what might be set in an alternate universe.

That SNW and DISCOVERY are somehow equivalent to TOS in terms of continuity is the current party line. But this need not always be the case. DISCOVERY blinked and folded on their reinterpreted Klingons. PICARD season 3 showed a TOS-era Constitution class ship, and of course had Worf looking like Worf.

TPTB gambled that they would gain more new fans with the changes than lose existing fans. How this ultimately plays out is still unknown. But if enough people go against it, then TOS might stay in visual continuity and DISCOVERY/SNW/SFA+ canonically shifted over it its own alt universe sandbox. At the very least, try and please all segments of the fanbase with LEGACY.

What, that Star Trek is a work of fiction and that it shouldn’t be taken as a literal historical document?
For example, the Daystrom Reddit outright bans people for suggesting an in-universe explanation for DISCOVERY and SNW being ahem so different to everything else is a multiverse. And r/startrek of course heavily policed comments about the implications of the USS New Jersey.

I feel that way about the TOS crew nowadays when I watch the show - which I still do, because I love it better than anything since.

But I find the SNW crew more plausible and attractive as people in many ways. Certainly SNW Uhura, and Chapel, and including SNW Spock.
My amount of objections to SNW would drop down if it clarified its place in continuity. It's already more than a visual reboot. Yes, TOS is "dated"... but "Relics" and "Trials and Tribble-ations" etc did a great job addressing this in universe. I buy the argument that Michael Okuda makes that Star Trek is very much a period piece. And ultimately SNW will never measure up to the awesome Pike era Marvel comic series Early Voyages, so maybe I'm too biased on that front anyway...

It's Star Trek. The canon/continuity debate is never over:D

But, since this keeps drifting away from SFA, I think I'll let this one go after this. Well, it will be "set in the DISCOVERY timeline"...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top