No evidence of that.
Several articles have mentioned paramount needs better programming to draw in new sign-ups. Pretty much why it was abruptly canceled after only 5 thirteen to fifteen part episodes.
No evidence of that.
Yeah but did they get that info from Paramount themselves? Or were they just speculating?Several articles have mentioned paramount needs better programming to draw in new sign-ups. Pretty much why it was abruptly canceled after only 5 thirteen part episodes.
So, it's interpretation of another person's statements so not really valid.Several articles have mentioned paramount needs better programming to draw in new sign-ups. Pretty much why it was abruptly canceled after only 5 thirteen to fifteen part episodes.
Yeah but did they get that info from Paramount themselves? Or were they just speculating?
So, they cited sources then? As in "Paramount published this and stated why" type sources?Looks like both. Paramount+ isn't getting enough users so they are cleaning house on under performing series.
So, they cited sources then? As in "Paramount published this and stated why" type sources?
If not, then equally plausible is that Discovery was getting too expensive, and Paramount wants to save money because streaming services are now a loss leader.
So, the answer is no evidence then. Just assumption.Just so glad it's over. So happy.
So, the answer is no evidence then. Just assumption.
Good to know.
All streaming services are hitting this point. Paramount is no exception.Paramount plus isn't popular and isn't making money.
Eisegesis.Obviously that is what's happening.
Hopefully not.He is at least a fan of star trek himself and gets it.
All streaming services are hitting this point. Paramount is no exception.
Eisegesis.
Hopefully not.
I don't want a fan running the franchise. So hopefully Kurtzman or someone like him remains.Kurtzman may be out. He never was a fan if star trek and had no business being ahead of it creatively. He has nearly killed the franchise.
That's not true at all.He never was a fan if star trek
His contract doesn't expire for another 3 years.Kurtzman may be out
He was only ahead of it creatively with Discovery and one episode of Picard.and had no business being ahead of it creatively
That's not true at all.
his contract expires in 3 years.
It depends on the wording in the contract.That means nothing. They can still fire him.
Tell me you've never been under contract without telling me you haven't been under contract.That means nothing. They can still fire him.
That has nothing to do with Discovery and everything to do with their lack of any other content and market saturation of streaming services.Paramount plus isn't popular and isn't making money. They are course correcting with Picard. Obviously that is what's happening. It might be too late now. Hopefully they will decide to let Kurtzman go and bring in metalas as the head of Stat trek. He is at least a fan of star trek himself and gets it.
Yup. Since he tanked so much trek they will save more firing him.If they cancelled his contract they would have to compensate him for an early termination.
5 successful series and one movie isn't 'tanked'.Yup. Since he tanked so much trek they will save more firing him.
5 successful series and one movie isn't 'tanked'.
He brought Star Trek back from the dead.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.