The transporter is a constant problem and has been for decades. So, it comes down to inventing tech to break it. Feels as cheap as anything else Trek is doing.
At least it makes logical sense if you have a jamming field up that prevents transporting.The transporter is a constant problem and has been for decades. So, it comes down to inventing tech to break it. Feels as cheap as anything else Trek is doing.
It does.At least it makes logical sense if you have a jamming field up that prevents transporting.
It fulfills the logical requirements on how to counter said tech.
Otherwise it creates a larger logic gap as to why that person wasn't saved.
I've seen situations where IRL people sit there and do nothing while a crime happens in broad daylight in front of them.It does.
And Star Trek does it a lot. It's not logical but it is what it is.
Theoretically.I've seen situations where IRL people sit there and do nothing while a crime happens in broad daylight in front of them.
It's called "The Bystanderd effect".
But a machine that is well programmed, should be able to do much more.
From Deanna's dream sequences.
The anomaly was within inches of the hull and the shields were obviously at the failure point for the hull to be dissolving.Cortez, despite being a trained "Yellow Shirt" in StarFleet, isn't blessed with "Plot armor" and dies immediately by getting sucked out into space, and nobody beams his body up immediately.
Thats pretty much all you ever seem to sayAnd before I get accused of saying that past Trek did something then it is ok Discovery does it, I am not
And? Would you like me to lie? I state how I feel, and if I don't like something. Currently, I don't care for a lot of Season 4. But, it isn't because of the transporter or someone dying.Thats pretty much all you ever seem to say
Nah, that's just box ticking.You just need to know how to bypass the tech and what the tech does or doesn't do.
It's not impossible to write a show that has stakes while using all the high tech gadgets in the world to it's full advantage.
Rookie.He obviously panicked at the last moment and didn't.
Maybe that's how you feel, you're entitled to that.Nah, that's just box ticking.
Sure he would. The entire point of that plot line is for that character to have "issues", be it Data, Zora or some other character in a similar situation. The tech is there to fail.Data wouldn't have had that issue if he was connected to the ships main functions and had control over it.
Yup. It was just Cortez's time.Sure he would. The entire point of that plot line is for that character to have "issues", be it Data, Zora or some other character in a similar situation. The tech is there to fail.
I made the joke in another forum, but if the writers were going to go fanservicey anyway, they could have had her sing Sabotage since it's a famous Captain's favourite piece of classical music. lolYeah, though as with Tom Paris's interest in the 20th century, it's something of an established pattern for the character given Zora's previous interests in Funny Face and Buster Keaton films. If she starts showing the crew episodes of Paw Patrol or something I'll have bigger questions.
You and I hang out with very different people.But yeah, like I said, I totally get it but it kills the world building for me. We live in an age where people barely go back to consume media that's from the 90s - which is why everything is being remade instead - so the idea of people in the future being so obsessed with the equivalent of Homer seems rather silly to me.
They don't? I hear some of the twentysomethings at work playing songs from 90s, 80s and even the 70's. Rick James' "Super Freak" is very popular with one young woman.We live in an age where people barely go back to consume media that's from the 90s
-_-Sure he would. The entire point of that plot line is for that character to have "issues", be it Data, Zora or some other character in a similar situation. The tech is there to fail.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.