The American Revolutionary Army would be considered terrorist by today's standards.There is no excuse for terrorism. May the Flag Smashers burn in hell!
The American Revolutionary Army would be considered terrorist by today's standards.There is no excuse for terrorism. May the Flag Smashers burn in hell!
Yeah, Marvel has no interest in being consistent from film to film (or TV show to TV show) about how devastating the Blip was. They wanted Spider-Man: Far From Home to be a mostly light-hearted movie where the only weighty part would be Peter coping with Tony's death, so that's what it was. They wanted The Falcon and the Winter Soldier to be a darker, more realistic look at what some of the consequences of the Blip would be, so that's what it was. They're going to ask the audience to squint a bit on the continuity so that different projects can achieve different creative goals. But that's really not that much different from what they did before -- the Hydra-inside-SHIELD-all-along and Bucky-as-Hydra-puppet revelations don't hold up too well if you subject them to too much scrutiny, for instance.
This is true. But the Marvel Cinematic Universe is a collection of works of fiction, and if the creators don't want to maintain total consistency between installments so as to facilitate their creative goals in each individual project, that's their prerogative as creators. I mean, they've already done that on a smaller scale. Iron Man 3 ends with Tony realizing he needs to move on from his role as a superhero in order to grow as a person; Avengers: Age of Ultron begins with Tony back in the suit Because Reasons. In Captain America: Civil War, supporting Steve in his rebellion against the Sokovia Accords is depicted as this big thing that would probably land his compatriots in prison for the rest of their lives, but in Ant-Man and the Wasp we find out that the biggest consequence for Scott was being put under house arrest and needing to sneak out from under FBI Agent Randall Park now and then in a silly cat-and-mouse game. They weren't going to totally upturn the creative direction of the Ant-Man films to satisfy the creative direction of the Captain America films; they weren't going to do the second Avengers without Robert Downey Jr. just because of the creative decisions made in Iron Man 3.
Me after yet another inconclusive fist fight
![]()
By the way, I'm absolutely pro-deescalation and I think that police should use guns only as an absolutely last resort, but really, at this point even the most lenient law enforcement out there would have used deadly force against them. Let's imagine that a SWAT member had filled them with bullets as they were about to kill the hostages. I think even the most liberal politician would have said that the use of force was justified.
AVC: There are some huge action pieces in the first episode. You’ve worked on action projects before, but I have to imagine there’s still a learning curve when it comes to, say, shooting a dogfight in a canyon. What was the most difficult set piece for you to figure out?
KS: I think all the action sequences have to serve character and story and character story. So I looked at every one of those as having a unique angle and a unique perspective. I wanted each action sequence to have its own unique DNA at its core. So we really looked for how to mix that up in a way that was not only satisfying visually from a certain perspective, but really from a character place.
I look at action sequences much like you look at a drama sequence: It’s still got a beginning, middle, and end, and it’s got violence in it of some form that’s character based.
I guess one of the things that I did as a sort of overview was that we reduced weaponry. That does mean that all the things we choreographed come from sort of a different mindset, and that just by definition brings a different flavor to a scene.
AVC: Why did you decide to do that?
KS: For obvious reasons. I think that we need to look at weaponry in entertainment as being too much of a crutch. We wanted to have our characters be clever and interesting and not just rely on the go-to.
I think the better, more obvious comparison should be Tom Perrotta, the author of The Leftovers which the TV series is based on.I tend to agree that I don't want to see the MCU spend too much plot time on ramifications of the blip--these are super-hero movies, not Margaret Atwood.
The American Revolutionary Army would be considered terrorist by today's standards.
That's not what I learned in History of Western Civilization.They didn't shoot anyone who wasn't shooting at them.
One more followup on my last post. I do like the movies to have some depth in the characters and story, so I'm not looking for totally mindless action, but I also don't want to see them getting bogged down in to many extraneous detail, and at this point it feels like that is exactly what going any deeper into The Blip would be.
That's not what I learned in History of Western Civilization.
The American Revolutionary Army would be considered terrorist by today's standards.
They only introduced The Snap to give us a big shocking cliffhanger ending for Infinity War, and The Blip as a way to give the characters a big heroic moment, and to bring back characters like Dr. Strange, The Falcon, and Spider-Man, I doubt it was ever their intention to go all that deep on it.Then it would have been wise for TPB at Disney/Marvel to avoid trying to make the "biggest ever"/"biggest disaster" type of story and either not have the will, interest or ability to follow up with what would be an expected series of sub-plots regarding its impact on all mankind. No character / film should be free of the unimaginable weight that billions of returned people would place on the world--and it certainly would not be what was presented in Spider-Man: Far From Home, but what was explored in Captain America and the Winter Soldier--for a start.
You prefer insurrectionists or treasonous rebels? According to the rules of the day, the British government, via its armed forces, was well within its rights to put down the insurrection (one that never had majority support within the colonies as a whole). And if you think the colonials never engaged in acts that would be defined as terrorism in today’s context, you need to read books published within your lifetime. Oh and a fair number of Loyalists would like a word.Are we talking about the country in general or specifically the events of the Revolutionary War? Big difference there. The British were given the opportunity to peaceably leave if they did so choose to, and when they chose not to, they didn't start slaughtering noncombatants, they shot the soldiers.
They only introduced The Snap to give us a big shocking cliffhanger ending for Infinity War, and The Blip as a way to give the characters a big heroic moment, and to bring back characters like Dr. Strange, The Falcon, and Spider-Man, I doubt it was ever their intention to go all that deep on it.
By the way, I had a similar discussion on a Comic Book forum: you can kill the 98% of superheroes out there with a bullet. They are still alive because the writers say so.
Riiiiggghtt...you can kill Hulk, Vision, Colossus, Thing, Doctor Doom, Iron Man, and Magneto (just to name the ones on that cover) with bullets!By the way, I had a similar discussion on a Comic Book forum: you can kill the 98% of superheroes out there with a bullet. They are still alive because the writers say so.
(and this is exactly the plot of this story)
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.