I really enjoyed this one. Saru once again demonstrates why he is one of the most interesting and well-developed characters on the show. The only thing sabotaging this episode from earning a perfect score from me was the idiot ball that suddenly spawned to be tossed around by everyone in the final third. I gave this one a 9/10.
There's a lot to unpack in everything that unfolded tonight. While most of the reveals for the nature of Saru's people weren't entirely unexpected by this point, the exact details were fascinating (and we still have a lot of things left blank). At one point I almost began to wonder if we were going to find the Ba'ul was some AI the matured Kelpiens devised to keep their own nature pacified; something they built to ensure a "perfect world" to the best of their ability. Side note: this episode was mildly irritating in the constant insistence to demonstrate again that the show's writers don't understand what "evolution" is. The post-Vahar'ai Kelpians are not "evolved", as they are the same specimen (if you'll excuse the term), they are simply matured. Even 'metamorphosed' might be a more apt term. "Getting evolution wrong" is a long-standing Star Trek trope I had hoped we could finally move beyond, but as also demonstrated in Tilly's Short Trek, I can see they don't even realize the depth of their misunderstanding. It's just used as a word that sounds science-y and means "better". Ah well, at least here it's mostly just a semantic quibble more than the absolute gibberish in "Runaway".
The scene with Culber was moving, and I agree that it was peculiar to see Stamets missing the giant flashing lights of discomfort despite his relief in having his love returned. Culber couldn't have been telegraphing his existential disassociation more clearly than if he'd outright stated it. I hope we see more of his soul-searching, but then I was looking forward to Stamets' too after his interaction with Tilly in the season opener, but now that Culber's back that line of character development has been shot down, so I won't get too attached to the possibility (in some ways, the season's pace is hamstringing good emotional payoffs by rushing through too quickly). Likewise, the relationship between Saru and Burnham is a major strength again, and her coming to his rescue more than once is heartwarming to watch. I was surprised when she came to his side on the bridge and actually bailed him out against Captain Pike rather than attempt to get him to seek help, which leads me to one of the two threads that felt forced and unexamined in the episode: Saru's changed personality and the solution to the Ba'ul's "balance".
Saru, now free of his "fear", has become irrational, angry, and impulsive. He is justified in his resentment at being lied to and being subject to what he believes is an oppressive life on Kaminar. But the Saru we know would never have been so self-righteous and disrespectful toward Captain Pike and his (Pike's)
very reasonable attempts to deal with the situation they knew very little about. This is not an unreasonable reaction for Saru, but the reaction by the crew appeared to be leading to Saru needing a psychological and emotional evaluation (and, I suspect, quite a bit of therapy as he adapts to his new hormonal balance). Instead, they support his request to beam down to the planet despite him being emotionally and rationally compromised, and worse, they beam him to the
one place he is sure to be recognized, jeopardizing what is meant to be a semi-covert information-gathering mission. And, as surely as that was an unwise choice, the one and only person he meets is his sister. These are choices that could have been made on purpose for various reasons, but it felt like no one considered it at all, despite it coming across on screen as an obvious problem.
As for the other issue I had, the Ba'ul were presented as very cautious and pragmatic. They are scary and ominous, to be sure, but they acted along with their intentions and motivations as stated. The moment Saru sacrificed himself to their demands, they immediately pulled back. They were honest in their desire
only to maintain the balance and presumably perform damage control. They had no interest in starting a fight even though the implication is that they had every ability to be at least an equal match for Discovery. Likewise, their entire system of balance with the Kelpiens is minimal and non-invasive; they allow the Kelpiens to live an idyllic life free of interference and, as Saru admits, in complete lack of want or rampant disease and war. The Ba'ul only harvest Kelpiens at the moment they become an imminent threat to that balance, and we're given enough facts to know this is likely true as given (and, importantly, nothing to the contrary). This "balance" is a situation which surely needs to be resolved, as it is still an artificial and involuntary state the living Kelpiens are not party to (I have my curiosity about the possible situation(s) that led to this balance), and is therefore something that the Federation is going to see as unjust and oppressive. But it is also not punitive or without reason, and there is no immediate threat except that posed by Saru himself.
Because of this, it becomes
extremely difficult to see why everyone on the ship, upon learning of the near-disaster in the planet's history, immediately believes the best solution is a sudden and irreversible complete overhaul of the entire planet's social and biological structure. Saru repeatedly states that the matured Kelpiens can "rise above their nature" but so far he has demonstrated the complete opposite! Maybe if we'd had a few episodes between his Vahar'ai and this, where he came to terms with his new situation and his volatility had died down this would be easier to swallow, but as it is the episode undermines any credibility in his claim, and the fact that no one questions it is baffling. It was especially surprising to see so little push-back from Captain Pike, as usually he's the voice of Federation Reason this season in these charged situations, but I suspect he isn't given any objections to raise when the crew suggests assisting what is more likely than not a prelude to violent revolution or open war because there aren't any solid, rational answers to that objection. Meanwhile, Burnham is
shocked when the Ba'ul very pragmatically reveal they will, as promised, seek to contain the problem through genocide. This reaction sadly makes her look impulsive as well, since one of the only things they even know about the history of the world is that the Ba'ul have very good reason to have "Never Again" as their motto, and the one thing they've built their entire system to prevent has just occurred at a magnitude they probably hoped would never be possible. How anyone as intelligent as Burnham could be surprised that the Ba'ul response to a world-ending threat is to end it first, I cannot fathom.
Ultimately the Ba'ul are deeply in the wrong, being content with a status-quo that keeps them in power and safety rather than finding a harmonious solution with their Kelpien co-inhabitants, but the episode never justifies to me that the only alternative is transforming an entire species of pacifists overnight into a rage-induced uprising with no preparation or plan, especially in light of both the history and the personal examples we are shown of the situation being quite likely as bad as it sounds. Lots of people are going to die.
In the end, I was a bit torn on the somewhat-but-not-quite Deus Ex Machina of the Red Angel saving the day. It's appropriate and justified in the ongoing story, and raises a lot of tantalizing new questions (and answers a few minor ones) about the season's plot, but it was a little bit of a pat solution that undermined the moment by removing the immediate consequences of Our Heroes acting without due consideration. Assuming there will be further consequences a lot of this episode may look better in retrospect, though it'll always be weakened slightly by the lack of introspection in the story itself by its characters, and it didn't drastically affect my ability to enjoy the rest (it's not the first time these characters' impulsivity leads them to make mistakes that go unrecognized at the time). None of these were fatal flaws, but they did sometimes feel like we're meant to engage on the allegorical level rather than the literal as presented if we're to make sense of the outrage and subsequent superficial solutions.
All of that said, I really felt like this episode went somewhere great, and made some wonderful strides at doing a lot all at once (for the show, for Saru as a character, for the worldbuilding, and for the season's plot) in a way that mostly felt organic with what we knew.
I'm still curious to know more about the Ba'ul, what they are, and how they function. I too felt a resemblance to Armus, and while I hope there's no connection, I can't rule it out.
I have to say that the decision free the Kelpians without really having a plan for the next step did come across as very TOS. It did seem odd that Pike ended up being deferential to his subordinates at first, but given that Burnham is the expert in the field as he himself pointed out, it makes sense he would accept her advice..
I agree. That scene just needing him questioning it and then deferring to Burnham, but without that it felt like he was essentially absent which doesn't ring true with his characterization this season.
I really hope that the Red Angel does not turn out to be any of our cast. Especially Michael.
I felt the visceral emotions from Saru. It was kind of scary and I might side with the Ba'ul on this one.,
With the detail we finally saw tonight, my first reaction was that the Red Angel resembles Emperor Georgiou in her shape-shifting disguise. I really hope they aren't going to reveal this "Saviour of the Galaxy" is a Section 31 operative jumping through time and space playing cat-and-mouse with Starfleet crews to lead them where she wants them to intervene.
As for Saru, I agree (surprising no one who read my rather long post this far), but I can't side with the Ba'ul on anything but their own fear of the Kelpiens (we have cold numbers but lack context of the conflict(s) involved in their history). The lack of recognition that the Ba'ul are justifiably afraid was strange, and I wish the crew had at least considered that there was a profound lack of urgency in what was going on. The system had been in place for two millennia and was in a peaceful equilibrium. That's a great opportunity to open up a diplomatic solution with the Ba'ul and work out some peaceful transition, especially since Starfleet had a means of pressing the issue and forcing the Ba'ul to sit at the table. But it's never even suggested as an option.
Yes, I'm not sure why anyone - Pike, Burnham - would be convinced that the Kelpians will create some just new balance. They were the original predators, after all. And Saru certainly is undergoing some personality changes minus the fear ganglia.
I find it hard to believe the planet will become some model of interspecies cooperation, but maybe I'm just cynical.
It seems very unlikely the situation will improve without causing a lot of Kelpien and Ba'ul deaths before (and if) it improves, which is basically a worst-case scenario in my mind. I sympathize with Saru pushing for this solution, both because of the immense amount of personal injustice as well as his duty to his people, but his irrational impulsivity doesn't explain the acquiescence of the crew.