Well, we know that Kurtzman and Kadin have said they would like Discovery to go on for 'many years'.
Having S31 being greenlit would in my mind increase the chance of a third season. Since they're set in the same era, they can reuse sets and art departments etc (if located in Pinewood) which will reduce production cost.
It would ultimately depend on if Netflix would want to continue to subsidize New Trek for the world audience. I mean I don't think we even know if Netflix will get worldwide rights to the Picard show, or the new animated series. I know Germany used to have a huge Trek fanbase, but is that enough?
I could see them continuing the Mirror Universe storyline from ENT as part of a flashback/crossover.It dawns on me, when S31 gets up and running, will we see any characters guest star? Could we see flashbacks with Captain Killy when Georgiou is reminiscing? Could the Discovery show up in an episode? Topic for another thread, I suppose.
I’m pretty sure Kurtzman has said Kirk will not appear in the series.The season will end with them answering the distress call of the Farragut and we’ll meet a lieutenant Kirk.
He’ll join them for season 3.
I don’t believe him for a second. Spock was never supposed to appear as wellI’m pretty sure Kurtzman has said Kirk will not appear in the series.
The season will end with them answering the distress call of the Farragut and we’ll meet a lieutenant Kirk.
He’ll join them for season 3.
It'll have the same budget, if not more. What makes you think otherwise?The actual interesting thing will be the budget that season 3 will have: Right now, they are shelling blockbuster-movie money at it! If that continues, it can easily be deemed a succeess. If they're cutting everything down to DS's "Titans" level of production, we know they're not really happy with the audience figures. But they will still keep it alive and continue!
No to Spock was before they changed show runners. As soon as they were gone, Spock just suddenly shows up in the Press.I don’t believe him for a second. Spock was never supposed to appear as well
It’ll be Scotty or McCoy then.
It'll have the same budget, if not more. What makes you think otherwise?
Picard has a gigantic budget too, if their tax credit for filming in LA is accurate.
Call me a whore for production values, but the Season 2 premiere was the best the TV side has ever looked, and genuinely rivals the Bad Robot films.Overall: A penny spared, is a penny earned.
Not necessarily, they could just be planning ahead.Yeah, They pretty much confirmed that there will be a Season-3 last night at the DISCOVERY Premier in NYC.
Call me a whore for production values, but the Season 2 premiere was the best the TV side has ever looked, and genuinely rivals the Bad Robot films.
That needs to be the benchmark for all these shows going forward. I do not want to see this franchise ever regress to the stoic style that The Orville goes for. It looks cheap and unbecoming.
The only issue is Star Trek rights are with Netflix
Yeah, They pretty much confirmed that there will be a Season-3 last night at the DISCOVERY Premier in NYC.
Really? That adds some credence to it then.And the Farragut disaster happens in 2257, the year this season takes place.
Actually, the fourth film was never officially confirmed by Paramount or CBS (as in given a release date), but a lot of folks assumed it was because of all the BTS conversations going on and publically being discussed as well as preliminary contracts being divulged.They hold the rights to Disco and its spin-offs, but not to new shows like Picard and Lower Decks.
I expect that Australians will wind up with Trek split across two services.
The fourth Kelvin film was confirmed - twice - and that ain’t happening.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.