It's very Space Mountain with the lights on. I was stuck on that ride once. Not ideal for someone who is afraid of heights.Oh no.
Anyway. I'm going to ride my turbo lift to Deck 78.
It's very Space Mountain with the lights on. I was stuck on that ride once. Not ideal for someone who is afraid of heights.Oh no.
Anyway. I'm going to ride my turbo lift to Deck 78.
It's why I don't do rollercoasters.It's very Space Mountain with the lights on. I was stuck on that ride once. Not ideal for someone who is afraid of heights.
Why must you hurt me like this?
It mostly stunk....I like a couple episodes. But I will never rewatch any of this season again...
What's ruined? Is Squire of Gothos deleted for you?Yeah it was a bad season. They really gave us a terrible story with Trelane abd made him a Q. They ruined the original by having the SNW crew meet Trelane before Kirk. They just cant leave TOS alone.
What's ruined? Is Squire of Gothos deleted for you?
TOS is by itself. That's how Trek is is best served.
And since Trelane didn't appear as WE the audience saw him (he was under the guise of, I believe, an Andorian wedding planner) the crew would never have realized who he really was, and after Trelane's father came to get and discipline him it seems the crew's memories were altered or, at best, incomplete.
Was it hamfisted? Sure. Is it irreconcilable with continuity? Not really.
That's the objection? That's some high level bullshit right there. They already had encountered the Thasians, and an evolving Gary Mitchell. That hardly ruins anything. Godlike beings are treated pretty casually in Star Trek.No. But kirk wasnt the first to encounter him. The SNW crew did. Also they seemed not amazed at all that they met a god like being.
Look up the word "ruined" and tell me how not being a good story fits that.Still. It bothered me. Also it just wasnt a good story in my opinion.
No, it wasn't an enjoyable story. And you know what I call that? Not a good story.I wasn't crazy about that episode (Rhys Darby's fun performance aside), but it doesn't grossly violate the continuity.
Perhaps the caper episodes of SNW wouldn't sting so bad, if there were longer seasons. As it stands, though, like a third of the season is wasted on throwaway episodes.

Tell this to a company that thought 10 episodes was also enough for Frasier...
10 was too many for the Frasier sequel.Tell this to a company that thought 10 episodes was also enough for Frasier...
It felt for me like seasons 12 and 13, it was such an organic return in my opinion.Also I really liked fraiser and if they did more episodes they would have had more chatacter development. 20 episodes in 2 seasons for a sitcom is terrible. Back in the day it was near 30 eps per season.
It felt for me like seasons 12 and 13, it was such an organic return in my opinion.
Yeah it needed more to really develop the characters and since it was telling a story over an actual year 10 episodes for it just made no sense. It can't have been that expensive to produce considering it was filmed in front of a live audience, unless Kelsey Grammer took such a payday for himself that there was no money left to make a show.
It is ironic it became a ratings success after getting cancelled. But Paramount seem to want to have their cake and eat it but forgot to buy themselves a cake.
A mid sitcom at best, not even on a par with Just Shoot Me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.