How'd they fix that problem?I believe @shakham brings up a good point. I think the technology is going to prove untenable for another reason--perhaps the way conventional warp travel was shown to cause subspace instability back in TNG.
How'd they fix that problem?I believe @shakham brings up a good point. I think the technology is going to prove untenable for another reason--perhaps the way conventional warp travel was shown to cause subspace instability back in TNG.
How'd they fix that problem?
Technically, there never was a canon solution--on screen, DS9 and VOY seemed to ignore it entirely, though in the Voyager writer's "Technical Manual" it was suggested that Voyager's "variable warp geometry" gimmick allowed for travel at arbitrarily high velocity, without causing instability.How'd they fix that problem?
The warp plasma injectors were refitted with handwavium amplifiers that negated any unwanted instability at ludicrous speeds.How'd they fix that problem?
The difficulty with the spore drive is that they will have to kill it off in a way that prevents it being used even once to make sense why it is never picked up again, eg by Voyager, in times of due emergency. The warp drive issue was a cumulative effect analogous to global warming, and we've seen the spore drive work now without tearing apart the fabric of reality in one trip. We have to get to a point where it can't work at all to make sense. My guess is the tardigrade is irreplaceable, or a Trek style gimmick like every time they use it they shift parallel universes.I believe @shakham brings up a good point. I think the technology is going to prove untenable for another reason--perhaps the way conventional warp travel was shown to cause subspace instability back in TNG.
Um, they're pretty much the SAME character. (Seriously, Lorca has the EXACT SAME attitude as Jellico. However Lorca DOES have a better sense of humor.)I'll give you the latter. However, Lorca is quite literally the least approachable (Starfleet) captain I have ever seen in Trek. Hell, I'd be more at ease talking to Edward Jellico.
You're not thinking about Cox enough.
Not sure I see it - they share an expectation of excellence (so did Sisko) but Jellico was a stickler for the rules, and Lorca seems the type who goes by his gut, and will ignore pretty much any rule if he thinks he knows better. He has a Kirk streak about him in that regard.Um, they're pretty much the SAME character. (Seriously, Lorca has the EXACT SAME attitude as Jellico. However Lorca DOES have a better sense of humor.)
You're not thinking about Cox enough.
What i really don't understand is why are the Klingons trying to destroy the dilithium mining colony on Corvan II instead of capturing it through ground troops.
If they conquered Corvan, it would have been a huge advantage for them in the war. Even if they weren't successful, troops on the ground would have made the situation for Starfleet much more difficult to deal with.
Honestly I think Stamets is one step away from being a conscientious objector. Broadcasting the distress calls from the mine snapped him back into the reality of the situation and any other crew members who may have been having second thoughts were likely brought back into it as well. It really was a brilliant move on Lorca's part to demonstrate what's at stake.
I think he represents the Nobel/Oppenheimer archetype. The scientist appalled at what the military do with his invention. I'm interested to see what his actions will be if/when Lorca takes things too far. Whether he goes along with it, objects in some way overtly, or throws his wooden shoes, called Sabots, into the machinery.
I liked this episode better then the previous one.
I really feld sorry for ripper an how they tortured him/her.
If they keep using ripper this way they violate everything the Federationstandswill be standing for.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.