Sure ProtoAvatar, to which post are you referring too? In which post did you site an episode where the 60 million figure was quoted?READ MY POSTSYes, from what episode did you get 60 million?
From May 10, 1940 through June 25, 1940 there was the Battle of France, 46 days ending in the French surrenderAnd consider:
WW1 and WW2 were the bloodiest wars in human history; France was a main front in both wars;
My numbers were specifically French military personnel of WWI, there were no "holocaust victims." Unless you were referring to the holocaust of war.The casualties include soldiers, cannon-fodder, civilians, holocaust victims - EVERYONE.
We are reading your posts, you're pulling numbers out of the air.
I second that. Sourced information always makes a MUCH stronger case; otherwise it's just dealing in hypotheticals without a basis.
That would take a LOT of Katracel white to keep them functioning.
That weakness would be much too easy to exploit-that would be a logistical nightmare.
how many jem'hadar does it take, ...to keep suppressed the hundreds of worlds composing the dominion (each one of them, an interstellar culture numbering in the billions), make the occasional conquest, etc?
If the Founder's are agreeable to something less than an instant response, the Jem'Hadar who do respond to, say an uprising on a Dominion planet, might not even have existed at the time the uprising. The Founder directed their creation, allowed them to reach maturity, and sent them into combat with older Jem'Hadar leadership.In some cases, none.
If they step out of line, then the Jem'Hadar are sent in.
It hardly condescend to simply, but firmly, ask what your source of information is. Was it a episode? Was it a interview with one of the writers on the show? Was it from a commentary on a DS9 DVD perhaps?when I actually repeated my relevant posts and told you to "READ MY POSTS".
Really, T'Girl? I know you're trying to be condescending
What does that have to do, even remotely, with the previous post (assuming it does)?The french casualty figures for WW2 - 567600 - encompassed all french causalties, civilian, military, holocaust victims, etcMy numbers were specifically French military personnel of WWI, there were no "holocaust victims."
Choosing a different number drastically skews the results. Obviously the point that the Jem'Hadar are very expendable is clear from the dialogue--the comments the Jem'Hadar themselves make, the attitude of the Vorta, and the Founders, but you are not doing a good job of substantiating your point by doing so with numbers that you are making up.
It just occurred to me that after their fourteenth birthdays, the Jem'hadar might simply begin to die of old age. A Jem'Hadar at twenty is referred to as a "Elder" because physiologically they are in fact "Elderly."
If you're saying that there are somewhere close to at least 100 million Jem Hadar at any time patrolling the Dominion, I can't help but to think of the "white".
It can't be replicated, it's supposed to be rare, and the Jem Hadar need a lot of it or they go crazy, get weak and die.
Soldiers that are defending you, or advancing your cause can't be utterly expendable.
It just occurred to me that after their fourteenth birthdays, the Jem'hadar might simply begin to die of old age. A Jem'Hadar at twenty is referred to as a "Elder" because physiologically they are in fact "Elderly."
I think this is a good explanation.
IBut on the other hand, if the Founders used the Jems exclusively as cannon fodder that would have been really, really, really, really self destructive.
Soldiers that are defending you, or advancing your cause can't be utterly expendable.
I mean that's like shooting bullets all around and about instead of aiming towards the enemy target, though I get your point about them..
The jem'hadar elders - which are around 20 years old- are shown to be far fitter than their younger counterparts, both mentally and physically.
If you kill 1000 jem'hadar today (because you just feel like it) and start growing 1000 jem'hadar
Choosing a different number drastically skews the results. Obviously the point that the Jem'Hadar are very expendable is clear from the dialogue--the comments the Jem'Hadar themselves make, the attitude of the Vorta, and the Founders, but you are not doing a good job of substantiating your point by doing so with numbers that you are making up.
Not really, Nerys Ghemor.
You see, we're talking percentages. No matter how many jem'hadar you postulate, the mortality rate among them is abnormally high, if few survive to be 15 - far higher (by an order of magnitude, at least) than the mortality rate from any war in human history.
Choosing a different number drastically skews the results. Obviously the point that the Jem'Hadar are very expendable is clear from the dialogue--the comments the Jem'Hadar themselves make, the attitude of the Vorta, and the Founders, but you are not doing a good job of substantiating your point by doing so with numbers that you are making up.
Not really, Nerys Ghemor.
You see, we're talking percentages. No matter how many jem'hadar you postulate, the mortality rate among them is abnormally high, if few survive to be 15 - far higher (by an order of magnitude, at least) than the mortality rate from any war in human history.
If you have no idea what the normal life expectancy would be, and you have no idea what the base population is, AND you have no idea what the casualty rate per engagement on average is, NOR do you know how many battles the Dominion gets into on a regular basis and what level of force is required in each of these battles, then frankly, you are making numbers up to suit your a priori assumption and you can't expect anybody to take that seriously.
If you want to suppose that the casualty rate is ridiculous, as I mentioned--you can at least offer evidence for that in the form of dialogue. There ARE lines that would indicate a callous disregard on the Dominion's part for the lives of their Jem'Hadar soldiers. You would NOT be able to conjecture numbers from those lines, but you could at least lend evidence to your point.
But pulling numbers out of unmentionable areas does NOT constitute evidence. Period.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.