G
Gul Sengosts
Guest
He wasn't the best actor on DS9 (imo that honour goes to Andrew Robinson and Jeffrey Combs), but I'm fine with him. It could get a little weird when he was agitated, but in more normal or silent situations I think he was really good. And as ZapBrannigan said, even the over-agitated stuff could just be a character trait, it's not incredulous imo.
And to be honest, his misfortune (if you will) was that he was on DS9 which on average had the best acting of any Trek, the competition was stiff. In my opinion Terry Farrell was the only one among the main cast whose acting was bad. Other Treks always had a lot of bad acting, it's only on DS9 that most of it was good.
If we compare captains, I think Brooks was actually the second best actor after Stewart. Shatner was fun but often just ridiculous. Mulgrew was meh and Bakula was just bad. Isaacs was pretty good, the most positive thing I can say about Discovery, but still I'd take Sisko over Lorca any day.
And to be honest, his misfortune (if you will) was that he was on DS9 which on average had the best acting of any Trek, the competition was stiff. In my opinion Terry Farrell was the only one among the main cast whose acting was bad. Other Treks always had a lot of bad acting, it's only on DS9 that most of it was good.
If we compare captains, I think Brooks was actually the second best actor after Stewart. Shatner was fun but often just ridiculous. Mulgrew was meh and Bakula was just bad. Isaacs was pretty good, the most positive thing I can say about Discovery, but still I'd take Sisko over Lorca any day.