Oh, of course...my mistake...She's a good guy.

No.WASN'T THE UNDRESSING SCENE ENOUGH TO PROVE SHE'S A HERO ON KIRK'S SIDE?????
Oh, of course...my mistake...She's a good guy.
No.WASN'T THE UNDRESSING SCENE ENOUGH TO PROVE SHE'S A HERO ON KIRK'S SIDE?????
Welll...I do hope you realize I was being sarcastic and not expecting anyone to take it seriously.Nobody takes that scene seriously.
It was subtle but I picked up on it.I do hope you realize I was being sarcastic and not expecting anyone to take it seriously.Nobody takes that scene seriously.
I thought it was there just to show - "Yes, we're NOT in the 'Puritan' 24th century!" - and cause TNG era fans to blow a blood vessel since it 's not showcasing her mind?WASN'T THE UNDRESSING SCENE ENOUGH TO PROVE SHE'S A HERO ON KIRK'S SIDE?????
Well, to be fair, William Ware Theiss (apologies if I misspell) simply wasn't around to explain his theory on future wardrobe to everyoneI thought it was there just to show - "Yes, we're NOT in the 'Puritan' 24th century!" - and cause TNG era fans to blow a blood vessel since it 's not showcasing her mind?![]()
I've often wondered if at times, women think with their crotch, like men are known to do?I thought it was there just to show - "Yes, we're NOT in the 'Puritan' 24th century!" - and cause TNG era fans to blow a blood vessel since it 's not showcasing her mind?![]()
Well they could not show her disarming that torpedo in her short Starfleet dress and panties, I am upset we did not get to see McCoy undress in his quarters.I thought it was there just to show - "Yes, we're NOT in the 'Puritan' 24th century!" - and cause TNG era fans to blow a blood vessel since it 's not showcasing her mind?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.