So in the Royal Navy an Admiral with no command experience can take over command of a ship?*polite cough* Which is why the Royal Navy is better
So in the Royal Navy an Admiral with no command experience can take over command of a ship?*polite cough* Which is why the Royal Navy is better
*polite cough* Which is why the Royal Navy is better
So in the Royal Navy an Admiral with no command experience can take over command of a ship?
How does that make the Royal Navy better?
Which doesn't necessarily mean anything in terms of a ship's chain of command In addition, as has been argued in other threads, there is apparently Command training in Starfleet, which has been compared to line officers in the US. Navy. Scotty, being an engineer, would not necessarily move directly in to the ship's chain of command, and Scotty doesn't strike me as the kind of person to push his rank around.True, but he was the highest ranking officer on the Bridge
Or someone just forgot about "Where No One Has Gone Before" when drafting the 1 year equals 1,000 light years at top speed equation?
Scotty, being an engineer, would not necessarily move directly in to the ship's chain of command, and Scotty doesn't strike me as the kind of person to push his rank around.
That doesn't sound nearly as direMy guess is they just came up with some random correlation. Though to be honest it would've made more sense even narrative-wise for it to be a 10 or 15 year trip back.
It was more of a question, and to a superior officer I might add.Well he was trying to order somebody to get him a towel
It was more of a question, and to a superior officer I might add.
Since Spock was the one addressing him at the time, I would be inclined to think that. Again, not an order either, but a requestDepends on if he was directing it to Spock
That doesn't sound nearly as dire![]()
And it didn't work.Pressman tried to
Do they really need one another anyway? This isn't being facetious but a legitimate question. There were several episodes were Voyager (and other Starfleet vessels) were run with a skeleton crew. So, the broader question has to become what pressing need is there to save all of the crewmembers, beyond the humanitarian ones?It doesn't have to be, and it gives more reason for people like Seska to want to take control (especially if they start finding shortcuts home): If it's not going to be such a long voyage back and they will all live to see home then do they really need one another?
Do they really need one another anyway? This isn't being facetious but a legitimate question. There were several episodes were Voyager (and other Starfleet vessels) were run with a skeleton crew. So, the broader question has to become what pressing need is there to save all of the crewmembers, beyond the humanitarian ones?
^^
Yes, they did. Missed opportunity, in my opinion, but hardly an error. More a facet of the production at the time.
Though, "Year of Hell" end up putting that point right under the microscope as only 7 crewmembers were left, including Tuvok who was blind, and they kept the ship going.
there is apparently Command training in Starfleet, which has been compared to line officers in the US. Navy. Scotty, being an engineer, would not necessarily move directly in to the ship's chain of command, and Scotty doesn't strike me as the kind of person to push his rank around.
Maybe the presence of high densities of dark matter make certain trips longer.
My point being that Scotty, at the time of the Trek 09, was not the ship's chief engineer, command training or not. He was not in the Enterprise's chain of command, though he certainly could have asserted his authority to take command had Spock been relieved after assaulting Kirk, and Kirk put in the brig for being in the fight.
In no way should my post be taken as "Scotty can't command!" as that is not my point.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.