Aside from that, though, brush up on your history. The losers don't get to dictate terms at the end of a war.
Speaking of history, did the winning nation of the Bay of Pigs battle get to dictate terms on the losing nation? That's more or less the magnitude of the Alpha victory over the Dominion...
Nonsense, the Dominion lost the War the moment the Cardassians turned on them.
Don't confuse the Dominion with the Dominion Expeditionary Force on the Alpha side (let's say DEF for short). The DEF was defeated militarily. The Dominion was brought to its knees with the bioweapon. But once the cure was handed over, the Dominion no longer was disadvantaged or "defeated" in any way. The DEF may have remained "defeated" at that point, assuming that the Alpha powers had somehow managed to disarm it. But if the DEF said "no, we won't disarm even if we agree to stop fighting", the Alpha powers couldn't really do anything about it. If they tried to force the issue, they'd die in scores, perhaps defeating the DEF but consequently losing out to the Dominion.
The female changeling ordered the Jem Hadar to stop because the enlightenment she experienced in her link with Odo.


Even if she claimed the above, we shouldn't believe her. Of course, she doesn't claim it, and none of the characters buys it, either. She made a simple deal and that was that.
I don't understand what a mutually agreed upon act act of war is in regards to this subject. Mutually would imply 2 or more sides agreeing that it was an act of war. Who are the 2 sides that agreed on that? From Sisko's perspective, this was an act of self-defense.
From Sisko's perspective, the mining was many things. An act of self-defense, of course. An exciting new prospect for victory, sure. A day's work, by all means. And an act of war. Sisko was the very first person to declare that the mining would inevitably launch an open war; in other words, Sisko thought that the mining would be an act of war. And it was clear to Sisko and the audience that Weouyn thought the very same thing, despite his insincere backpedaling.
I think kidnapping a military leader of a sovereign state and then replacing him with an imposter who starts a war that kills millions and then later attempting to destroy an entire solar system with an inhabited planet in it is a little more than killing by proxy or simply shady.
However, you are not the Federation. What the Federation thought of those things is "not worth going to war over". In other words, "not an act of war" - de facto, that is. And since we are discussing two different interstellar empires that do not share a legal base, de jure is rather irrelevant.
It seems given that the Federation turned the other cheek not because it approved of the Dominion actions, but because Starfleet was not yet ready for war. That doesn't alter the factual setup where attempted nova-bombing Bajor B'hava'el was not an agreed act of war yet attempted mining of the wormhole was.
What's missed by most is that the Dominion doesn't own the Gamma Quadrant. They have their designated borders and the Federation and others from the AQ only violated it once, to seek peaceful first contact.
That is the Federation view of things. The Dominion view was clearly stated in "Jem'Hadar": any intrusion of the Gamma Quadrant through the wormhole is a direct aggression towards the Dominion, quite regardless of where the intruder heads after clearing the wormhole.
Federation lawyers could discuss jurisdiction issues till the cows come home, but the relevance of jurisdiction is zero. When the Soviets deployed missiles in Cuba, the US didn't have a legal leg to stand on in opposing that move. Nevertheless, the US acted in self-defense, and made it clear that they would define the right and wrong, the crime and the punishment, on this issue where juris-my-diction was totally lacking. The actions of the US in that situation were no different from the actions of the Dominion, except in minor details such as the number of lives lost in driving home the point.
The Caribbean is in the US sphere of influence, irrelevant of national borders. The Dominion declared that wormhole traffic (including both ends of the wormhole itself) is in its sphere of influence. The Federation disrespected that declaration at its own peril, just as the Soviets did when deploying their missiles. And the Federation could just as well have chosen to respect the declaration, exactly like the Soviets could have chosen not to deploy a nuclear-ballistic threat in Cuba.
An act of rank bullying? Sure. But what does that string of words have to do with anything? Calling the Dominion names, or soothing them with diplomatic syrup, would not alter the basic facts of the matter: that the Dominion had a sphere of influence it would defend with lethal force, and that the Federation had ambitions on a sphere of influence that would conflict with the Dominion's. One side or the other would have to back down, but neither would have the faintest hope of a "legal basis" or "right of way" on the issue, except from their own bigoted viewpoint.
Timo Saloniemi