yammerhead said:
Sci said:
Starfleet entered Dominion space once without their permission, and did so with the intent of attempting to peacefully contact the Dominion government to negotiate peace.
I'll have to trust you on that, because my memory is faulty. But even so, the Cardassian Union was Dominion territory...so how does the Federation or Bajor have the right to mine the only logistically sound passageway from the heart of the Dominion to one of its territories?
The Federation does not, but Bajor does, because it is
their terminus. The Dominion does not have any inherent right to use that particular terminus, only Bajor does; use of the terminus is a privilege that Bajor extends or withdraws at its pleasure, legally-speaking.
The Dominion isn't going to sit back and let the Federation tell them to take the 75 year scenic route...it's in their interest to keep the wormhole open.
Yes, but that doesn't make their actions legal or non-hostile.
And to get back to the original point: trespassing is trespassing. The Dominion was under no obligation to honor a so-called peaceful contact attempt by the Federation, made by what was undoubtedly a heavily-armed ship. Sounds like gunboat diplomacy to me...
And yet they didn't start a war over it, but instead over the mining of the Bajoran Wormhole's AQ terminus.
Timo said:
Aren't we seeing this from a rather biased point of view? We're arguing that Sisko obeyed Federation law and treaties, but why should the Dominion be concerned with Federation law and treaties? Their own law is just as important in the conflict, if not more so.
I don't see why Dominion law would be any more important than Federation law. However, I'm not even convinced there
is a such thing as Dominion "law." The Dominion just does what it wants.
The Federation first knowlingly trespassed in "Jem'Hadar", when the Odyssey was sent through the wormhole against the explicit notice of the Dominion that the Gamma side was their sovereign territory.
Not exactly. The Dominion never made any territorial claims over the Gamma Quadrant terminus of the Bajoran Wormhole. They simply declared that they would not allow Alpha Quadranters to be in the Gamma Quadrant anymore, and would use force in response to such a presence. They never made any territorial claims. It would be the equivalent of the United States declaring that it would no longer allow European citizens to be present in the Americas; it's not a claim of ownership of all of North and South America, but, rather, an act of rank bullying.
Also, Weyoun made it explicit that mining or otherwise blockading the wormhole would be an act of war. Even if UFP lawyers tried to have a differing viewpoint, this could and should be ignored: criminals don't get to formulate law to their advantage. "It's an internal affair of ours" is the classic defense of oppressors and warmongers, and one that had little factual basis in the case of blockading the wormhole.
Except that the Dominion had no ownership, nor did it claim such, of the Bajoran Wormhole. The Wormhole terminus was the property of the Bajoran government, and the Federation's act against it constituted an act of aggression against Bajor, not the Dominion. The Dominion violated its own neutrality agreement by then retaliating against the Federation for its act "against" Bajor.