The TMP ones all have the same head ridges since in 1978 and 1979 they were supposed to have the same spinal ridges that extended over the tops of their heads and down the foreheads. They also had sharper, more fang-like teeth in the first film.
What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
If only the Camp Crystal Lake participants received that memo. My issue is what they issue.
Theirs is never a trek worth taking.
These have already been said on the first few pages of this thread, but...
I think TNG seasons 1 - 3 are generally the show's best, and that DS9 starts to go very badly wrong from late season 4 onward. Even with Voyager, where I mostly agree with the popular perception that the show improves from the point Seven joins, I think the first three seasons are good and have a certain something that's lost later on.
I think TNG seasons 1 - 3 are generally the show's best, and that DS9 starts to go very badly wrong from late season 4 onward. Even with Voyager, where I mostly agree with the popular perception that the show improves from the point Seven joins, I think the first three seasons are good and have a certain something that's lost later on.
The thing about TOS is that about 40% of it is the worst shit ever put on TV, but an additional 40% is quite good, and the remaining 20% consists of the best Star Trek ever made.
Similar threads
