• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Technical Manual??
Technical Manual???

Voyager never had a Technical Manual.

The closest thing to a Technical Manual, is found on Cygnus x-1, and that is basically just copy and paste. And doesn't pay attention to the difference between a Galaxy class and an Intrepid class.

I am amazed that they didn't have a Galaxy class computer core onboard.

In sufficient care was achieved. Why? Because no fan pays attention to any details at all.
The only Voyager technical manual was an internal guide for the writers so they could maintain basic consistency in terminology when writing their drafts. It wasn’t meant as a mass-consumption, all-accurate document.
 
Or....the plot required Archer's much slower Enterprise to get there within four days and there's no rational explanation other than speed of plot. This isn't hard science, it's Star Trek.
That is not a rational explanation.

But, then, this is Hollywood.

They don't understand logic.


________________________________

In 1972, as I was being introduced to something 'called ' the seventh grade, the Science class introduced me to physics, thence to something "called ", the Metric System...

It amuses me that the Franz Joseph 'Booklet of General Plans:Con
Constitution Class ' has one inch is equal to ten meters.

This technically is considered to forbidden. Because you are mixing Apples and Goldfish.

But, personally? I go back and forth, with feet and meters...

Just to drive some people batty.
 
Last edited:
People really underestimate how hard it is to actually make a movie or tv show, and just assume all of Hollywood is stupid or ignoring fans.

Making a movie sucks. Even a fan film is a lot more labor intensive with a lot more moving parts than people think about. It's not as easy as it seems to just have everything fit in with the continuity of previous entries when you're on a budget, a timetable, and have to deal with the human factor across every single job. I'm not sitting in that damn makeup chair for five hours again just because someone got a throwaway reference or number wrong.
 
Seems like a lot of hardcore tech nerds have lost the objectivity to recognize this is all entertainment.

Right. It doesn't matter. So leave it the way it was. Was someone not entertained by 947 feet / 289m?

I am simultaneously being told that this has no bearing on anything AND being told that the new number is better or makes more sense. How can it be better if it has no bearing on anything?

Personally I would be more satisfied if they had changed it to the actual scale size of the model they use. THAT would be wildly entertaining, IMHO.
 
Qo'noS being four days away from Earth at mid-22nd century maximum warp being an example. Qo'noS being just a day or two away from Earth in the TNG Era series sounds ludicrous, but that's how Trek works. By the need and the speed of plot.
I'd like them to throw a monkey wrench into trek tech fans one day by stating that all warp speed is actually nearly instantaneous as FTL travel already violates causation. It's the course corrections, relative motion of the two locations being visited, gravity, and deceleration that takes so much time. So time spent traveling has only partial bearing on the actual arrival time to a destination.
 
People really underestimate how hard it is to actually make a movie or tv show, and just assume all of Hollywood is stupid or ignoring fans.

Making a movie sucks. Even a fan film is a lot more labor intensive with a lot more moving parts than people think about. It's not as easy as it seems to just have everything fit in with the continuity of previous entries when you're on a budget, a timetable, and have to deal with the human factor across every single job. I'm not sitting in that damn makeup chair for five hours again just because someone got a throwaway reference or number wrong.

My issue is that nobody gets into the business to make bad entertainment. Not actors, not writers, no one.

Our subjective opinions about the outcome of those endeavors notwithstanding, everyone is trying to make something good.

No network dumps millions of dollars at someone’s feet without believing that as well.
 
Right. It doesn't matter. So leave it the way it was. Was someone not entertained by 947 feet / 289m?

I am simultaneously being told that this has no bearing on anything AND being told that the new number is better or makes more sense. How can it be better if it has no bearing on anything?
It sounds like you’re saying that since it doesn’t matter, it really really matters?
 
Not if you're referring to the sport that you call football, otherwise that would get very confusing.
No, those are football fields. Unless you use the same stadium for both, then it gets confusing, as in my home town. Our Football Club's season is ending in a few weeks but our football team's season is just starting and they share the same stadium, which can be annoying as you can see the marks of the football gridiron faintly on the soccer pitch when the football club is playing home games at the stadium. there, hope that was confusing.
 
Right. It doesn't matter. So leave it the way it was. Was someone not entertained by 947 feet / 289m?

I am simultaneously being told that this has no bearing on anything AND being told that the new number is better or makes more sense. How can it be better if it has no bearing on anything?

Personally I would be more satisfied if they had changed it to the actual scale size of the model they use. THAT would be wildly entertaining, IMHO.
the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function. One should, for example, be able to see that things are hopeless and yet be determined to make them otherwise. This philosophy fitted on to my early adult life, when I saw the improbable, the implausible, often the ā€œimpossibleā€ come true.
 
The Starship Enterprise has always moved at the speed of plot.

I think the TNG Tech Manual even clearly states this - the tech is there to support the story, not the other way around.
Every bit of this.

I mean, look how fast the TOS ship got back to the Kalandan outpost to save Kirk, McCoy and Sulu from the Losira holograms. By THAT point the Losira modifications had been stopped and the ship was no longer traveling fast enough to cover 990.7 light years in the space of mere hours or even minutes. But sure enough Spock comes to the rescue soon after Scotty stops the engine modifications from blowing up the Enterprise.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top