The TMP ones all have the same head ridges since in 1978 and 1979 they were supposed to have the same spinal ridges that extended over the tops of their heads and down the foreheads. They also had sharper, more fang-like teeth in the first film.
What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
If only the Camp Crystal Lake participants received that memo. My issue is what they issue.
Theirs is never a trek worth taking.
These have already been said on the first few pages of this thread, but...
I think TNG seasons 1 - 3 are generally the show's best, and that DS9 starts to go very badly wrong from late season 4 onward. Even with Voyager, where I mostly agree with the popular perception that the show improves from the point Seven joins, I think the first three seasons are good and have a certain something that's lost later on.
I think TNG seasons 1 - 3 are generally the show's best, and that DS9 starts to go very badly wrong from late season 4 onward. Even with Voyager, where I mostly agree with the popular perception that the show improves from the point Seven joins, I think the first three seasons are good and have a certain something that's lost later on.
The thing about TOS is that about 40% of it is the worst shit ever put on TV, but an additional 40% is quite good, and the remaining 20% consists of the best Star Trek ever made.
Why did it have to be FRIDAY'S CHILD? PLATO'S STEPCHILDREN I can definitely see.
More like 55.
I’d still argue that he wasn’t trying to make bad movies.
fair enough. he even made a few good ones, one of them truly great. I just assume he made so many movies those were accidentally good.
its kept us here discussing it for year after year
so it must have done something right.
I think it does many things right, mainly because entertaining.
But there seems to be this idea that it is the greatest thing ever and all episodes should be the greatest thing ever orbits garbage and disappointing and ruination.
Presidential comment omitted.
While I like the look, that suggests a significant “weak spot” — hit them hard on the forehead and you break their back!
After you've rewatched an episode 100 times, the luster fades, and you start to see the flaws. 
Thus, the barrel is the most insidious adversary. It can strike the back and break the head or strike the head and break the back.
Long shall songs be sung when the Warriors of Kling defeat the most terrible for wielding a barrel: D'nkey Kong!
Which Roger Corman movie do you consider truly great? I'm not sure which one you mean offhand.
Frankenstein Unbound. Brian Aldiss wrote the novel. The cast had John Hurt, Raul Julia, Bridget Fonda and that guy from INXS. It weird. It was low budget, but usually didn't look like it. It was amazing.
Much like Ed Wood. In his mind he was making quality cinema.
Mind you, we're talking about Ed Wood's mind.
Quality dollars anyway.
Similar threads
