• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?

Modularity in starship interiors is of course the most natural assumption in the world - after all, we know for a fact that those are modular. We can see the seams! (And the separate modules, although only in photographs that also reveal large amounts of timber and plywood.)

That the whole superstructure of NCC-1701 would be a module is true for a certain NCC-1701-A in a certain timeline in a certain timelapse sequence. It being a module for Pike's current ship is possible, but not particularly helpful in explaining anything, because all the changes before DSC can be explained by the interiors being modular, and the current size change can't be explained by the whole thing being that.

But if the interior is made of separable wedges, for all we know the entire saucer is. So just yank out a couple in front of the bridge area, and also remove the innermost ring of the remaining wedges, to install whatever you wish; Like MMoM says, this could be a ship of Theseus as much as it is one of Pike or Kirk. The interesting bit then perhaps becomes, why is it the only one so far? And that's then dramatically interesting territory, rather than treknological apologism - is this a historically important ship worth preserving past its due date, perhaps, even though TOS never suggested such? A Starfleet experiment at extreme modularity, never repeated? A ship that goes down, way down, twice a year, and always bounces back, shrugging off multi-hundred-percent casualty figures and daring a True Hero (or a Young Expendable Fool) to accept the jinxed center seat?

Control's a weird bird. It's obviously already self-aware, right? So why would the Sphere data change anything?

To allow it to become more self-aware? There're obviously degrees to that as seen ITRW.

Supposedly, though, the Sphere would tell it how to grow more powerful, and more capable of achieving its aims ("This is how you modify a kitchen utensil into a nanoprobe injector", "This is how the Electronic Advisor to King I'Dyath of Alpha Beta succeeded in becoming the Overmind of Beta Quadrant for five million years, and this is why it fell"). Whether it would also teach it new aims is debatable, because supposedly the currently stated aim of total sterilization is also what it ultimately achieves after gaining 100% Sphere data. But perhaps that assumption is faulty, and giving it the rest of the data would turn it all Gandhi, while the current tally of 54% is what makes it so successfully and pathologically omnicidal?

Timo Saloniemi
 
Considering that current naval and cruise ships are modular, I don’t see why humanity would have disused this technique in 200-300 years. In fact, it makes more sense if you consider starships are built in space due to their massive size. Cabins, bars, the bridge, etc on cruise ships are all generally interchangeable with ships of the same class, and can be moved on and off during refits, without having to take the ship out of service too long to have to build each individual room. Some ships are even lengthened.
 
We just have to accept starships as even more modular, to provide a proper excuse for changes that go back and forth on the Enterprise. Unless swaps were truly trivially easy, it'd be difficult to see back-and-forth as being viable.

Unless, of course, the installation of a new thing proved a complete disaster and its removal then an absolute necessity. But are all the changes we see here simultaneous disasters, and is every one of these best countered by going back to the old?

Timo Saloniemi
 
Actually Star Trek started out with bad guys. Talosians who treated Captain Pike as a lab rat, the salt vampire who mocked Spock and McCoy as it was murdering Kirk, Charlie X and Gary Mitchell who were given godlike powers which they abused without a second thought. And we've seen many, many bad guys since then.

You really don't know the difference between an "antagonist" and a "badguy", do you?
 
7RCqNoP.png

Sí, Capitán Pica!
 
Why isn't that sombrero on top of a TV set? Gene's Vision!!!

Speaking of which, I sort of assume Spock will return to Pike's ship for the fight. But if there's only one Enterprise set, the one we see here, we'll probably miss out on any other familiar characters from "The Cage" such as Boyce, or from "Where No Man" such as Scotty. We might get name-drops, though. Are any of the extras in that pic sufficiently similar-looking to be That Other Tyler?

Timo Saloniemi
 
I think with the last two episodes of Season 2, this threads opening premise will be definitively answered.

:beer:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top