And now you're just gaslighting me you blacked it out after I pointed it out.It fits into the hull of the 1450 foot-long ship perfectly, as it was designed to do. Try to keep up
View attachment 35514

And now you're just gaslighting me you blacked it out after I pointed it out.It fits into the hull of the 1450 foot-long ship perfectly, as it was designed to do. Try to keep up
View attachment 35514
you edited out the part where it says a scale cheat is needed to fit engineering into the shipIt fits into the hull of the 1450 foot-long ship perfectly, as it was designed to do. Try to keep up
View attachment 35514
I guess production didn't want it to fit.if production wants it to fit, just scale it down!
I'm not an expert on the tech (all I know is it works like those old 3d head tracking gimmiks for flight sims only tied to the movements of a professional film camera and on a much larger scale covering the walls cielings and maybe the floor) but from the laymans perspective I can imagine two possibilities...I don't understand why they would design a virtual set that needs a scale cheat at all -- it's CGI, if production wants it to fit, just scale it down!
All of which, are not part of official on-screen canon.Years of context and precedent silently working from the same set of reference materials.
I'm not an expert on the tech (all I know is it works like those old 3d head tracking gimmiks for flight sims only tied to the movements of a professional film camera and on a much larger scale covering the walls cielings and maybe the floor) but from the laymans perspective I can imagine two possibilities...
A) maybe it doesn't handle smaller spaces well, perhaps the effect becomes more noticeable when the wall its showing isn't in the distance
B) the smaller room didn't look impressive enough for the tone they had previously set with discovery, and so rule of cool prevailed. Which is perfectly fine there is plenty of precedent for trek series doing that just don't expect me to throw out continuity and replace an old wrong length figure that influenced a large body of work with a new still wrong length figure that causes headaches for previous works...
All of which, are not part of official on-screen canon.
Screen canon has been popularly rejected when it breaks continuity for no justifiable reason plenty of times before. So I'm confident in saying you two are entitled to your opinions.Your acceptance or rejection of what is seen on screen doesn't change that the 442m length is established on screen now.
on screen canon is the only canon that matters.Screen canon has been popularly rejected when it breaks continuity for no justifiable reason plenty of times before. So I'm confident in saying you two are entitled to your opinions.
So you believe klingons had ktingas in the 2150's, and you are entitled to your opinion.on screen canon is the only canon that matters.
So you believe klingons had ktingas in the 2150's, and you are entitled to your opinion.
You're someone who knows what they like and I can respect thatAnything to see more K't'ingas.
You're someone who knows what they like and I can respect that
They danced around continuity without violating it so much in that one, it could have been written by Gene Kelly.Merci. Tbf though I also like continuity. So while I enjoy the Ferengi, I didn't like "Acquisition" in terms of needlessly violating continuity
They danced around continuity with ut violating it so much in that one, it could have been written by Gene Kelly.
Technically it wasn't a first contact. They never got their names.Honestly was it even needed lol? They could've done first contact with the Trills or the Bolians instead without violating continuity
So you believe klingons had ktingas in the 2150's, and you are entitled to your opinion.
Technically it wasn't a first contact. They never got their names.
True,I more meant they wouldn't need to dance so much to begin with
True,
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.