Fan service (ファンサービス, fan sābisu), fanservice or service cut (サービスカット, sābisu katto)[1][2] is material in a work of fiction or in a fictional series that is intentionally added to please the audience,[3] often sexual in nature, such as nudity.[4][5] The term originated in Japanese[6][7] in the anime and manga fandom, but has been used in other languages and media. It is about "servicing" the fan[8]—giving the fans "exactly what they want".[9] Fan service can also refer (by means of text, symbol, image, sound) to other stories[3][10] that contain visual elements.
Well then this qualifies as fan service because it gave me exactly what I wanted.
![]()
In modern times everyone equates fan service to mean the same thing as fanwank. Maybe that wasn't the original definition, but it's what everyone goes with today.
Fan Wank refers to a fan's personal theory about a work, designed to resolve inconsistencies or help make sense of the work, but tending only to reveal that the fan is putting way too much thought into the exercise
Everyone today considers fanwank and fan service to mean the same thing, to be self-referential to the point of distraction
I also addressed this in the thread I linked above:Just because a notion is widespread doesn't make it correct.
Neither of the terms "fanservice" or "fanwank" actually mean what they're being claimed to mean, as I've demonstrated.
And to clarify, that book published in the 1990s defines fanwank as being self-referential. As a book from the 1990s predates anything written on Wikipedia, I rest my case.My uncle has a Doctor Who book published in the early 90s which provides a definition of the term fanwank as meaning fan service. Pretty sure that outdates most stuff found online these days.
Meanings change with usage. What it meant originally is for the history books.Just because a notion is widespread doesn't make it correct.
Neither of the terms "fanservice" or "fanwank" actually mean what they're being claimed to mean, as I've demonstrated.
Saying something contrary to the “widespread notion” doesn’t make it correct either.Just because a notion is widespread doesn't make it correct.
Neither of the terms "fanservice" or "fanwank" actually mean what they're being claimed to mean, as I've demonstrated.
Did you miss the part in that definition about "fan service" often being sexual in nature?
That scene is fan service...but the film itself Isn’t inherently fan service.The Vader hallway scene was gratuitous at best. If that isn't fan service then file it under unnecessary filler.
The Vader hallway scene was gratuitous at best. If that isn't fan service then file it under unnecessary filler.
I enjoyed some of the movie. Most of it was not that enjoyable.That scene is fan service...but the film itself Isn’t inherently fan service.
But none of that matters. All that matters is whether or not you enjoyed it.
And I love every damn moment (except the Leia scene*).
*Okay, Tarkin hasn't aged well. At the time, I defended the CGI mask over how it was different from Leia. But now I wish they had recast both roles.
idk if overwhelmed is the right word... what percentage of the runtime are we talking about?You add all the legacy cameos and references and Rogue One becomes overwhelmed with fan service.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.