Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter NewHeavensNewEarth
- Start date
Slow news day.
Just watching Westworld season 1. I appreciate that Star Trek would be too low rent for Evan Rachel Wood as a supporting character but I could dig her as Rand.
If you are interested in the popularity of Strange New Worlds, why are you referring to "Parrot Analytics" and not to the Nielsen streaming charts?
Paramount+ is sending data to Nielsen since February 27 this year.
If you see the phrase "demand" it means it's data from the audience measurement company "Parrot Analytics".
"Demand Expressions" is a marketing term they invented. It's a made-up metric that has a dubious basis that does not reflect reality and what people are actually watching.
Example:
According to "Parrot Analytics", Star Trek Prodigy is one of the most in-demand TV shows in the US.
Right.
Keep in mind, that is "demand" for "TV shows" not "animated shows".
"Parrot Analytics" is saying that there is a higher "demand" for "Star Trek: Prodigy" than for Taylor Sheridan shows like "Tulsa King", "Mayor Of Kingstown", "1923", or other Paramount shows like "FBI", "S.W.A.T." or "SEAL Team".
"Parrot Analytics" is also saying that "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" has a higher "demand" than "NCIS".
So much for the validity of "Parrot Analytics" and their "demand" metric.
Well, it's got to be at least as good as the Canadian Chart Guys stuff.
I have not posted data from Numeris for over a year now. I'm living rent-free in so many people's heads.
Canadian charts are so 2010s, early 2020s.
It's 2023.
We have data from Nielsen now.
You can look it up for yourself.
No need for "Parrot Analytics", "Whip Media", or data from some third-party audience tracking and analytics companies.
Why rely on some third-party analytics company and not on data send from Paramount+ to Nielsen if you are interested in the popularity of Strange New Worlds?
To see how accurate "Whip Media" is you just need to compare their ranking with the latest data from Nielsen:
https://www.mediaplaynews.com/the-o...on-again-top-weekly-whip-us-streaming-charts/
There are quite a few inconsistencies.
According to "Whip Media" "Secret Invasion" was in first place, "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" in fourth place, and "The Witcher" in eighth place.
According to "Nielsen" "Secret Invasion" was in 9th place and "The Witcher" in fourth place with almost double the watched minutes.
But hey, just a few minor discrepancies.
"Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" is not even in the Nielsen Top Ten charts for that week.
Why?
I'm good, yo.
Even if what you say is true (and I am by no means suggesting I believe it) why does it matter? Why does any of that matter?If you are interested in the popularity of Strange New Worlds, why are you referring to "Parrot Analytics" and not to the Nielsen streaming charts?
Paramount+ is sending data to Nielsen since February 27 this year.
If you see the phrase "demand" it means it's data from the audience measurement company "Parrot Analytics".
"Demand Expressions" is a marketing term they invented. It's a made-up metric that has a dubious basis that does not reflect reality and what people are actually watching.
Example:
According to "Parrot Analytics", Star Trek Prodigy is one of the most in-demand TV shows in the US.
Right.
Keep in mind, that is "demand" for "TV shows" not "animated shows".
"Parrot Analytics" is saying that there is a higher "demand" for "Star Trek: Prodigy" than for Taylor Sheridan shows like "Tulsa King", "Mayor Of Kingstown", "1923", or other Paramount shows like "FBI", "S.W.A.T." or "SEAL Team".
"Parrot Analytics" is also saying that "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" has a higher "demand" than "NCIS".
So much for the validity of "Parrot Analytics" and their "demand" metric.
I have not posted data from Numeris for over a year now. I'm living rent-free in so many people's heads.
Canadian charts are so 2010s, early 2020s.
It's 2023.
We have data from Nielsen now.
You can look it up for yourself.
No need for "Parrot Analytics", "Whip Media", or data from some third-party audience tracking and analytics companies.
Why rely on some third-party analytics company and not on data send from Paramount+ to Nielsen if you are interested in the popularity of Strange New Worlds?
To see how accurate "Whip Media" is you just need to compare their ranking with the latest data from Nielsen:
https://www.mediaplaynews.com/the-o...on-again-top-weekly-whip-us-streaming-charts/
There are quite a few inconsistencies.
According to "Whip Media" "Secret Invasion" was in first place, "Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" in fourth place, and "The Witcher" in eighth place.
According to "Nielsen" "Secret Invasion" was in 9th place and "The Witcher" in fourth place with almost double the watched minutes.
But hey, just a few minor discrepancies.
"Star Trek: Strange New Worlds" is not even in the Nielsen Top Ten charts for that week.
TOS never ranked higher than 52nd in the year-end Nielsens the whole three seasons it was on the air. Yet we're ALL here talking Star Trek because that series existed and went the way it did.
Since when is Star Trek a popularity contest? Did you all become fans because it was the cool thing to do? Except, of course, @cooleddie74 , for obvious reasons.
I'm not the one who started that recent discussion.
I'm not the one who brought up the popularity and streaming rank of Strange New Worlds and compared it to other shows.
People here seem to be very interested in the popularity and streaming rank of SNW and discussed it.
Why aren't you lambasting them for bringing that topic up?
Why are you asking me that and not the people who started the recent discussion about the popularity and streaming rank of Strange New Worlds?
What don't you believe?
That Paramount+ is cooperating with Nielsen? Or that I'm making up Nielsen date?
How exactly do you think I'm supposed to make up the Nielsen date?
Yet you felt the need to come back and create a rather lengthy response, twice.
Who's living in whose head now.
Because you're the one who expended such an enormous amount of effort to make a point.
Your interpretation.
Numbers are numbers. And they're accurate. Or not.
Depends on one's point of view, as another space-based franchise often told us.
Maybe.
Depends on one's point of view, as another space-based franchise often told us.
Maybe.
What you post.
Not even remotely. Get over yourself, boy.
Similar threads
- Poll
