Spoilers Strange New Worlds General Discussion Thread

[Ray Hardgrit]

I never understood the incessant, almost pathological need to make shows in the miniscule time period between DSC and TOS, other than to reuse existing sets and props. And even that is irrelevant, since CBS Trek all looks the same whether it takes place in the 23rd, 25th, or 32nd centuries.

They want to use Spock. I think that's mostly the reason.

 

[Dukhat]

Was Spock in SFA?

 

[Tuskin38]

since CBS Trek all looks the same whether it takes place in the 23rd, 25th, or 32nd centuries.

100% disagree.

 

[Ray Hardgrit]

Was Spock in SFA?

It's not set in the time period between DSC and TOS.

 

[Dukhat]

100% disagree.

You’re entitled to your opinion.

It's not set in the time period between DSC and TOS.

And yet it was a show they made without needing Spock to bolster it. So they don’t need to shoehorn in another show between DSC and TOS.

 

[Nerys Myk]

It's not a period of the franchise that interests me in any way, TBH. I prefer TOS.

Part of me would like a TOS "reboot" to happen in between TOS episodes. Mostly to watch heads explode.

 

[Yistaan]

They can use the TMP-WoK period and get all the Spock they want. They can even dredge up Chapel-Spock again since the movies have no closure to any of their TOS drama. Heck, since Spock is due for at least 2 Pon Farr's during this 12 year period CBS can indulge their Spock shipping tendencies to an even greater degree than SNW did if that's possible.

 

[137th Gebirg]

 

[fireproof78]

Part of me would like a TOS "reboot" to happen in between TOS episodes. Mostly to watch heads explode.

Temporal Cold War shenanigans again.

 

[Noname Given]

I never understood the incessant, almost pathological need to make shows in the miniscule time period between DSC and TOS, other than to reuse existing sets and props. And even that is irrelevant, since CBS Trek all looks the same whether it takes place in the 23rd, 25th, or 32nd centuries.

Because the best series in the Trek franchise was set in that time period. Perhaps you heard of it, it was called:

STAR TREK
^^^
Without this one - none of the other would exist.

 

[Dukhat]

Because the best series in the Trek franchise was set in that time period. Perhaps you heard of it, it was called:

STAR TREK
^^^
Without this one - none of the other would exist.

Yes, because there are absolutely no other eras that could be explored other than the few years between the end of SNW and the start of TOS.

 

[cooleddie74]

Hey, the Earth-Romulan War and early years of the Federation.

Just sayin'. There are 93 years between the end of ENT and "The Cage(TOS)" and almost nothing has been done with it except for the U.S.S. Kelvin and a few flashbacks and a couple of Short Treks.

 

[fireproof78]

The USS KELVIN series featuring the ENTERPRISE under command of April.

 

[Dukhat]

Hey, the Earth-Romulan War and early years of the Federation.

Just sayin'. There are 93 years between the end of ENT and "The Cage(TOS)" and almost nothing has been done with it except for the U.S.S. Kelvin and a few flashbacks and a couple of Short Treks.

Or the show that I know without a doubt that every Star Trek fan everywhere wants: the 70 years of the Lost Era between 2293 and 2363. Monster maroons for the win, baby!

 

[Yistaan]

Forget SFA ending on a cliffhanger, we probably won't ever find out what Kovich and Zora wanted with Craft or what the consequences of Zora letting him get away are.

Zora: Craft, that's really just a code name isn't it?

Craft: My name isn't important. I'm just a guy. A Future Guy. (winks at the camera)

 

[Jayson1]

Time to go to another universe for stories. I want them to do a show set in the universe were Picard couldn't attend Worfs birthday party because he was busy on the bridge.