The Candle Ghost sat and watched.That's what they think. Poor Picard. Never got to live to see his fantasy of being married to two hot women at the same time in Crusher and Laris come true.
The Candle Ghost sat and watched.That's what they think. Poor Picard. Never got to live to see his fantasy of being married to two hot women at the same time in Crusher and Laris come true.
I have noticed that in my experience, nine times out of 10 "lazy writing" equates to "that's not what I wanted them to do.".That feels like "Lazy Writing" and relying on a form of "Deus Ex Machina" instead of logical believable conclusions to a story.
They put themselves into a corner and don't want to throw all that pretty writing away. RIP the darned sheet out of the typewriter, crumple it up and repeat until you got a good story, folks.95 times out of 100 for me.
The Candle Ghost sat and watched.
No.That feels like "Lazy Writing" and relying on a form of "Deus Ex Machina" instead of logical believable conclusions to a story.
I sometimes miss my old Remington. But I don’t think anyone’s dissertation would be flawless if forced to be written at the pace of television scripts. Certainly mine wouldn’t (not that it’s shaping up to be flawless with a much longer timeframe).did my graduate coursework on a manual typewriter
The needs of the plot outweigh the needs of the science? Oh sure, but keep it plausible AND entertaining.It doesn't. And it has always always always resorted to fantasy and magical explanations since the beginning.
Actually, two or three episodes of SNW have paid a bit more attention to science concepts than seven years of DS9.
But what Trek has always adopted as a baseline is the enlightenment posture that the Universe is knowable and can be understood through reason. And that's close enough to science, I suppose.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.