Strange New Worlds is contradicting previous StarTrek, even if rationalizations can be conjured to explain said contradictions.
It already pulls me out of the universe that Chapel, Number One, and Lwaxana all look like Majel. With all due respect to the late actress and Trek figure, I'm fine with in the Trek universe having Number One "really" look like Rebecca, Chapel "really" look like Jess Bush, and Majel being the "canonical" face of Lwaxana Troi.
That just reduces the Chapel character to a joke (which will get tiresome very quickly, too). It's far better to make both of them fully realized independent characters so that they can be fully fleshed out without any arbitrary and stupid limitations (like never being allowed to be in the same room, or always having to explain why they look alike).
Strange New Worlds is contradicting previous StarTrek, even if rationalizations can be conjured to explain said contradictions.
When they introduce Uhura in the video from yesterday, there's a shot of the bridge at 0:49s. On the display behind her is what appears to be something akin to the old wireframe graphic of the TOS-era Enterprise. Can anyone make out if the nacelle pylons are straight? I wonder if this modification will be made to appease the fans (since really, the whole series is for that purpose!).
Strange New Worlds is contradicting previous StarTrek, even if rationalizations can be conjured to explain said contradictions.
It would an in-joke that’s no different than what’s on LD.
Or they could both be fleshed out regardless. And not being in the same room isn’t a limitation at all, unless you lack creativity.
It would an in-joke that’s no different than what’s on LD.
LDS is a comedy. Turning everything into a joke is the point. Turning a character's entire existence into an in-joke on a serious show is a terrible plan. And it absolutely would work severely to the detriment of the show's ability to flesh the character out since a large number of her scenes would be forced to continue the stupid running joke (and even if they gave up the running joke, they'd still have to deliberately structure things to avoid the possibility of new viewers confusing the two characters).
Indeed. Plus, people round up and down all the time; how much did Mr. Adventure really know? Memory Alpha is bound to what's on screen, not the other way around. If such irrelevant minutiae is contradicted, so what?
Indeed. It is a joke that is for the benefit of a small portion of the audience and is not additive to the narrative or character development.LDS is a comedy. Turning everything into a joke is the point. Turning a character's entire existence into an in-joke on a serious show is a terrible plan. And it absolutely would work severely to the detriment of the show's ability to flesh the character out since a large number of her scenes would be forced to continue the stupid running joke (and even if they gave up the running joke, they'd still have to deliberately structure things to avoid the possibility of new viewers confusing the two characters).
Exactly. She more than likely didn't begin her career in Starfleet in 2266, as a Lieutenant, on a top of the line starship. Memory Alpha is extrapolating from the truth that Uhura was first seen by viewers on the Enterprise in 2266. We don't know her career prior. It's like saying Scotty and Sulu began their careers in Starfleet in 2265. It's just that their first filmed appearance is that time.If Uhura is a sophomore in, let's say, 2259 (assuming a time jump for the show from 2258), then she's due to graduate in 2262. That would give her a twenty-three year career, as of Search for Spock, and would make her posting as a full Lt in 2266 more palatable after four years of service rather than just two.
Just like STD did every single week. Just like Enterprise did. And so on and so on.
Exactly. She more than likely didn't begin her career in Starfleet in 2266, as a Lieutenant, on a top of the line starship. Memory Alpha is extrapolating from the truth that Uhura was first seen by viewers on the Enterprise in 2266. We don't know her career prior. It's like saying Scotty and Sulu began their careers in Starfleet in 2265. It's just that their first filmed appearance is that time.
Strange New Worlds is contradicting previous StarTrek, even if rationalizations can be conjured to explain said contradictions.
It would need to be a few years longer, assuming she was assigned a ship as a Cadet or Ensign and working her way up to Lieutenant.It's extrapolating from a line that she served "twenty years", which is fair, as it's all we ever had to go on. Now, we have reason to believe it's a few years longer, but definitely less than thirty (and probably less than twenty-five), which just puts into within a simple rounding margin from Mr. Adventure.
Starfleet wasn't even established until five episodes after "What Are Little Girls Made Of?". And as for Uhura, she's a cadet here. Even if Mr Adventure is a creepy stalker whose "twenty years" statement is exact that still doesn't include her tenure as a cadet, unless she just went from new recruit to Lieutenant in one year. If she's, say a first-year cadet in 2259 she graduates in 2263, so she'd be a "twenty-two year space veteran", which can reasonably be abbreviated as twenty years.Strange New Worlds is contradicting previous StarTrek, even if rationalizations can be conjured to explain said contradictions.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.