And La'an isn't mean. She just isn't cuddly.Also Kurtzman didn't create La'an.
People need to stop blaming him for shit he didn't do.
And La'an isn't mean. She just isn't cuddly.Also Kurtzman didn't create La'an.
People need to stop blaming him for shit he didn't do.
I'll take your word for it.After April appeared, I kept kicking the name 'Adrian Holmes' around in my head...sounded so familiar...then I realized:
Yet ANOTHER actor from 19-2 has now appeared in Trek!
(on that show, Holmes played officer Nick Barron.)
I rewatched all the episodes this one connects to (last time was >5 years ago), and haven't found any clear inconsistencies. Using humans as breeding sacs is a little extreme thoughI'm going to try to re-watch Arena tonite. It might be consistent with their original appearance, but don't you think this characterization completely negates the anti-prejudice message of TOS’s Arena, of not judging people(or species) based on their physical appearances?
I'm not saying its inconsistent or some kind of plot-hole.
I would say she's sour, pissed all the time, but that's simply the beginning of her arc. The dark makeup around her eyes enhances it (many women wear it like that these days, and I don't see how that can be seen as beautyYes La'an. (Sorry I meant Singh not Kahn lol. I edited my OP)
Maybe "mean" isn't the right word, (Cranky?) but at least based on this episode, La'an is another Burnham/Raffi-type who continually pop up in Kurtzman productions, even his non-trek related ones.
you do know of her addiction and its effects, of course.T'Pol would disagree.
in the last big discussion about that, the conclusion was that they do it every morning, because it is logical to relieve certain physiological blood reallocations that happen in the morning... probably without emotions, purely mechanical, while both of them focus on other things like reading the newsVulcan's do not have sex for pleasure is a hill I'm willing to die on. Its a very human idea that sex is something to do for recreation. I am not judging them by human standards, who cares what consenting adults do and marriage is just a legal status as far as I'm concerned, but Vulcan's don't do things for pure pleasure. Casual sex is as out of character for a Vulcan as opening laughing or crying would be. If they aren't trying to have a kid, I don't think a full blooded Vulcan would ever have sex outside of Pon Farr.
Also, if a Vulcan regularly has sex, why would they even undergo Pon Farr? Honestly, making Vulcan's basically go into heat is a pretty weird idea, but it made sense if Vulcans don't usually have sex willingly, meaning that the Pon Farr was an evolutionary thing to insure the population stays stable in a world where most people aren't doing emotional or pleasurable things. If the majority of Vulcan's are just casually screwing, then there was no reason for them to apparently evolve to become like dogs in heat on a cycle. Romulans don't seem to have Pon Farr, and I've always assumed that they don't because they don't suppress their emotions, so they never needed the biological push to keep their population stable.
Again, this is just a bad, but small, subplot in an excellent episode of TV. At worst, if it gets to bad I can skip the subplot if it shows up again, its not effecting my enjoyment of the show, I just think its a bit of modern Trek stupidity sneaking into the show.
Would've been even funnier: They only touch fingers, and the waiter almost throws them outThe only detail I didn’t like was the kiss, which I found too human. I loved the old thing with the fingers in the TOS and TNG episodes: alien and still clearly intimate.
...
I would say she's sour, pissed all the time, but that's simply the beginning of her arc. The dark makeup around her eyes enhances it (many women wear it like that these days, and I don't see how that can be seen as beauty). Pictures of the actor at the preview or in interviews show a much more friendly face, of course...
Can't people change their votes? (I haven't voted myself so I can't check).I didn’t read the poll and accidentally rated this episode as terrible 10/10. Please ignore that, sorry. It’s 10/10 good or 1/10 good however you want to see it!
There's a big button called "change your vote" right there!Can't people change their votes? (I haven't voted myself so I can't check).
*phew*If only there was a "Change Your Vote" button or something ...
![]()
Maybe "mean" isn't the right word, (Cranky?) but at least based on this episode, La'an is another Burnham/Raffi-type who continually pop up in Kurtzman productions, even his non-trek related ones.
Well, take it as a retcon. You're not supposed to think that it's the same design -- it's not.Also, it might be something others have argued all too many times over, but I still wish that this re-imagining of the Enterprise itself had avoided the TMP-esque sweep back of the warp nacelle struts. Or rather, the design as it stands would work better for me as a post-TOS refit design, rather than purporting to be the same ship (and of the same era) as Matt Jefferies' original.
Yuck! :|This is the first episode of Star Trek since Voyager’s scorpion part 1 that I would give a 10/10.
Why didn’t you like this episode? I’d be curious to see in the Voyager forum what you thought of it? Obviously the Strange New World’s forum is not the place for discussing other Star Trek series, and I would also hate to hijack the thread with Voyager discussion.Yuck! :|
There's nothing mean about La'an. She's just a determined security type - they pop up in lots of popular fiction, especially these days, and there's no way to sort her out as a special affectation of Kurtzman's.
addiction?you do know of her addiction and its effects, of course.
very!Would've been even funnier: They only touch fingers, and the waiter almost throws them out
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.