It still could be. The chase could have happened in a alternate timeline as well.The entire fifth season is a sequel to 'The Chase'. It's not an alternate timeline.
It still could be. The chase could have happened in a alternate timeline as well.The entire fifth season is a sequel to 'The Chase'. It's not an alternate timeline.
Not really. Discovery is a prequel that turned into a sequel but since it altered time I assume the future 32nd century is an alternate future timeline. So it's not really a true sequel.
It's what the people who make the show assume that matters.
Please no.We need new writers and fresh futurists
So it's a difference that makes no difference at all. It's as much the future of Star Trek as a whole as TNG is the future of TOS.It still could be. The chase could have happened in a alternate timeline as well.
So it's a difference that makes no difference at all. It's as much the future of Star Trek as a whole as TNG is the future of TOS.
TNG was never really TOS' future.So it's a difference that makes no difference at all. It's as much the future of Star Trek as a whole as TNG is the future of TOS.
We don't know that TOS happened as-was according to TNG. In Relics, there were a number of discrepancies on the TOS bridge set, and Scotty thought Kirk was alive, meaning is can't be the same continuity as Generations.We dont know if the 32nd centuries past happened exactly as it was shown on tng. They've already changed khan past.
Yeah, you kinda have to go by author intent with this. Otherwise you would have to accept the possibility that every single episode of Trek happens in its own alternate timeline separated by some unknown minor difference from all the other episodes. And that would be kinda silly.
How can it not be? She didn’t die or anything. She’s an instructor like Reno.How can it be Tilly after Discovery?
That's not how sequels work.Not really. Discovery is a prequel that turned into a sequel but since it altered time I assume the future 32nd century is an alternate future timeline. So it's not really a true sequel.
Futurism does not interest me at all.We need new writers and fresh futurists.
Me neither. Trek is about us through the prism of Science Fiction not predicting the future.Futurism does not interest me at all.
That's not how sequels work.
Was a response to the "true sequel" and "alternate timeline" commentsSo season one it was a sequel to TOS?
That was simply the lost % while he was buffering.We don't know that TOS happened as-was according to TNG. In Relics, there were a number of discrepancies on the TOS bridge set, and Scotty thought Kirk was alive, meaning is can't be the same continuity as Generations.
...see how stupid this arguments are? Pretend what you want to, but don't try and make it seem like silly headcanons are the intention of the people making the show.
If timelines diverge at decision points, they do have common origins.The entire fifth season is a sequel to 'The Chase'. It's not an alternate timeline.
The events of "The Chase" could have happened in most timelines where Picard existed.The entire fifth season is a sequel to 'The Chase'. It's not an alternate timeline.
Yes, and given the popularity of the 24th/25th century trek series vastly outstrip the popularity of Discovery it is highly likely that the network executives will eventually openly retcon Discovery 31st century into being an alternate timeline so their isn't the inevitable shadow of The Burn hanging over their more popular shows.It's what the people who make the show assume that matters.
They could as that is how Burnham got into the Infinity Room.Yet in the 32nd century The Burn(ham) aside Starfleet still needs detached nacelle ships to transport from one system to another.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.