To be announced on April Fool's Day, of course.I for one welcome our holovision show Star Trek: April .
To be announced on April Fool's Day, of course.I for one welcome our holovision show Star Trek: April .
Have you not been following the various threads here on "Ship Size"?Like who? Has anyone said the older dimensions should be struck from any book about Star Trek's development over the decades?
Start?????Again, that's going to start pointless conflict in the fandom.
They were never canon. No design documents, concept art or piece of written media of any kind is solid canon.Most fans who care, already know the dimensions of the TOS Connie.
For the past 50+ years, they took the dimensions from Matt Jefferies diagrams and used that as the basis.
Now you want to over-ride his design doc dimensions?
So what if it wasn't on screen in explicit stated #'s.
50+ years of the fans knowing should count for something.
Yeah. Don't recall anyone demanding the SNW size being the only one to be mentioned in any history of the franchise. It would be a poor historian who did that.Have you not been following the various threads here on "Ship Size"?
We don't need to add another topic to that discussion by making these types of changes.Start?????
Pointless debates are this fandoms bread and butter
They were "Apocrypha", which is good enough to many of the Trek fandom who cared about the dimensions.They were never canon. No design documents, concept art or piece of written media of any kind is solid canon.
What do most fans call his first name?I view them a lot of things as canon until proven otherwise but so much has been changed from those materials.
If one holds them to such a standard that future material is the offender for not adhering then what about things like Sulu's first name being Walter?
That's his cousin, He served as a physicist on the Enterprise for a couple of years.If one holds them to such a standard that future material is the offender for not adhering then what about things like Sulu's first name being Walter?
"Hikaru"What do most fans call his first name?
You should pay more attention to the posts.Yeah. Don't recall anyone demanding the SNW size being the only one to be mentioned in any history of the franchise. It would be a poor historian who did that.
Exactly"Hikaru"
Apocrypha is by it's very nature not a fact. Now there's a lot of expanded universe material that I cling very tightly to and will headcanon the hell out of to make it fit.They were "Apocrypha", which is good enough to many of the Trek fandom who cared about the dimensions.
And now there are those who want to go back and change it.
Hikaru is his name but I can only speak for myself.What do most fans call his first name?
I thought his cousin was Kamehameha Sulu.That's his cousin, He served as a physicist on the Enterprise for a couple of years.
Where? Links?You should pay more attention to the posts.
They don't want the TOS Connie to be it's original stated sizes due to "New Canon On-Screen" info.
That one is a botanist.I thought his cousin was Kamehameha Sulu.
Where? Links?
Why would someone chronicling the history of Star Trek exclude that information?
Not seeing where someone says the old dimensions should be scrubbed from any books, articles and documentaries about Star Trek's history. Can you link to a specific post were it is?Spoilers - Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 3x08 - "Four-And-A-Half Vulcans"
Also I'm not sure how much time I would spend discussing American Earth customs if I hadn't seen the person I was hot for in a while. Depends on the custom.www.trekbbs.com
You were part of that conversation, did you forget?
Not seeing where someone says the old dimensions should be scrubbed from any books, articles and documentaries about Star Trek's history. Can you link to a specific post were it is?
Firebird:
Doesn't change the fact that we now have an official size of the Enterprise. Everything else is just fan speculation.
Noname Given:
No convincing needed - the 'size' was never stated on screen before now. Nothing 'new' to accept.
The Wormhole:
According to their own rules what's onscreen overrules everything else. These "Trek Nerds" you speak of owe it to themselves to accept the new size figures or they shouldn't expect anyone to take them seriously.
cooleddie74:
I'm a colossal TOS nerd and love the visual continuity. And I now accept it.
Yes. Many fans will.
Firebird:
Not on screen = not canon. Tie-in merch doesn't count.
Turtletrekker:
Publications are not canon.
Tuskin38:
That doesn't make them canon.
Nerys Myk:
This would mean all licensed products are canon. Not how it works
Tuskin38:
Nah they're all equally non-canon
DaveyNY:
And when They do use it and we see it in an episode/movie... it becomes Official Canon.
Before that, not so much.
Ovation:
But any “grey zone” material that is never on screen is automatically superseded by whatever material does appear on screen (deleted scenes excepted unless later incorporated into an official on screen production). So before last Thursday, the length of the Enterprise was…ambiguous. Now? It is not.
fireproof78:
Ok.
It's not canon everyone.
I personally love Matt Jefferies' work but mine, or any other fan accolade, will make it canon material, even if officially licensed.
You don't have to participate if you don't want to.
Again, that's going to start pointless conflict in the fandom.
Yes, I know we're dealing with fiction.You do realize none of this is real, right?
I guarantee you there are plenty of such "Nerds" that don't care about the "most minute of details."Yes, I know we're dealing with fiction.
But the details matter to some of us nerds.
We wouldn't be "Nerds" if we didn't care about the most minute of details.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.