Weird how a physical of the SNW-E looks way better than the CGI version. Not saying CGI is bad but they could do a lot better with their CG model on SNW....Absolutely right. These models are both the same scale and it just feels right.
![]()
Weird how a physical of the SNW-E looks way better than the CGI version. Not saying CGI is bad but they could do a lot better with their CG model on SNW....Absolutely right. These models are both the same scale and it just feels right.
![]()
I'll take that as a compliment.Weird how a physical of the SNW-E looks way better than the CGI version. Not saying CGI is bad but they could do a lot better with their CG model on SNW....
I'll take that as a compliment.
You're asking the question the wrong way, it isn't about what "WE" need, it's apparently about what 'YOU' want.
Most of US are quite happy with what They are giving US, because the other option is NOTHING at all.
And if that is what you believe, then what the heck are you doing here.![]()
I actually think it could have been a more interesting and funny episode if we were to see their mission on the planet and their Vulcan-ness would cause hijinks down there, endangering the mission. Up on the ship it all felt pretty low stakes.Lastly, I think not showing us the mission on the planet and not showing their transformation back to humans was a mistake. The episode skipped important stuff to focus on less important stuff.
Liked Luckinbill as Sybok and loved Tim Russ' Tuvok.That dishonor belongs either to Laurence Luckinbill as Sybok or Tim Russ as Tuvok.![]()
Personality traits might be passed down genetically — stuff like extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, conscientiousness or openness to experience —, but certainly not something as specific as the drive to rule, conquer and dictate. That would be a pretty fucked up way to view people.Personality traits are definitely passed down genetically in families, separate from "nurture".
I think you are mistaken, since pretty much everything behind those red benches seems to be the AR wall, including the windows, the ceiling and that upstairs lounge we curiously never see anyone go up to.While there were a couple of scenes in the officer’s lounge set (which used the AR wall in season 1), I still don’t think they used the AR wall in this episode. There wasn’t any shots that would require anything more than some stars on a background or a regular green screen. I’d guess they set up the portions of the set needed on another soundstage.
Really?! When did you stop watching? And why do I still see you in these episode review threads so often?Yes.You stopped watching?![]()
I’m curious which one you liked less than this one.The worst of the Trek franchise would probably be And the Children Shall Lead or Plato's Stepchildren. SNW at its worst (which this episode isn't) is still many times better than that.
I know we are not supposed to take that post-credits montage too seriously, but I found it a little contradictory that although Doug was specifically introduced as someone who has been fascinated with humans for years would be shown to be so clueless about human customs; even to a point where Spock of all people would be able to teach him new stuff.I don't know if it was mentioned, and I'm too lazy to read 30 pages. But I rewachted it and I have questions now regarding Doug, how does he not know that a birthday party is a yearly event? OR noticed humans use contractions? He must not have been in long relationship with Una
It has worked before and can work here.Enjoy the puppet episode is guess.I still can't believe they are going down that route. Smh
Since the last Kirk episode and because I enjoy Star Trek discussions.Really?! When did you stop watching? And why do I still see you in these episode review threads so often?![]()
Especially for a ship that carries 83 crew while the other has 203-430.If you don't upscale the Enterprise then the NX-01 and the 1701 have virtually the same size saucer section, which doesn't feel right at all.
Thank you very much, I most likely will, mainly because I don't have any unreasonable expectations.Enjoy the puppet episode is guess.I still can't believe they are going down that route. Smh
Plus Trip in the Mirror Universe episodes says that the warp nacelles on the TOS Defiant are stunningly large and impressive and he wonders how many warp coils they have. The 289-meter Enterprise does have considerably bigger nacelles than the NX-01, but the 442-meter Enterprise makes Mirror Trip's utterance that much more believable.Absolutely right. These models are both the same scale and it just feels right.
![]()
Indeed. One of the things I think a lot of people forget is that the SNW Enterprise has to exist in a post NX-01 world. I think they marvelous job designing a ship that has to look more advanced than the NX 01, while still looking less advanced than the refit. Neither of which existed when the original Enterprise was designed by Matt Jefferies in the 60s.Plus Trip in the Mirror Universe episodes says that the warp nacelles on the TOS Defiant are stunningly large and impressive and he wonders how many warp coils they have. The 289-meter Enterprise does have considerably bigger nacelles than the NX-01, but the 442-meter Enterprise makes Mirror Trip's utterance that much more believable.
Comedy. Anachronistic gestureWhat was that scene with Pelia trying to high-five Pike supposed to be about? Was that just meant to be a random = funny moment or did I miss something?
Comedy. Dragging a chair is funnier that carrying one.Didn’t they establish that Una as a genetically enhanced Illyrian has super strength back when she was carrying Hemmer over her shoulders in season one? Why then did she have this much trouble moving the chair in Pike’s Ready Room in this episode?
Because his iteration of the TOS Connie was used only in his show, ST:ENT, the size wasn't retro-actively applied.Thing is, as has already been mentioned many times in this thread and others on this subject matter, Doug Drexler, who is himself these days considered a Holy Prophet by many amongst Trek Fandom's ship nuts, already treated the TOS style Constitution class as being over 400 meters when working on Enterprise's In a Mirror Darkly. Why is it okay for this change to occur in 2005 with no complaints whatsoever, yet the same thing happens in 2025 and suddenly it's a betrayal to Trek Fandom?
You do know that Trek is a Multiverse of sorts, with countless timelines, parallel dimensions, universes, etc.Other than the usual rhetoric that everything from 1966-2005 is the Holy Works and nothing done since 2009 can be considered acceptable with the exception of Picard S3?
You mean like how SNW has direct ties to Discovery and Lower Decks which have explicitly made references to TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, Voyager, Enterprise, Picard and the TOS and TNG films between them and therefore have one seamlessly interconnected universe? And soon Academy will also be directly connected to Discovery and Voyager with at least one DS9 and SNW reference so far.Why does the actions of one show, have to ripple to other shows?
Why can't each show just be considered it's own continuity unless otherwise indicated that there is a direct relation to the other shows in the past?
None of that suggests that the older dimensions be scrubbed from books, articles or documentaries about the history of Star Trek.
Firebird:
Doesn't change the fact that we now have an official size of the Enterprise. Everything else is just fan speculation.
Noname Given:
No convincing needed - the 'size' was never stated on screen before now. Nothing 'new' to accept.
The Wormhole:
According to their own rules what's onscreen overrules everything else. These "Trek Nerds" you speak of owe it to themselves to accept the new size figures or they shouldn't expect anyone to take them seriously.
cooleddie74:
I'm a colossal TOS nerd and love the visual continuity. And I now accept it.
Yes. Many fans will.
Firebird:
Not on screen = not canon. Tie-in merch doesn't count.
Turtletrekker:
Publications are not canon.
Tuskin38:
That doesn't make them canon.
Nerys Myk:
This would mean all licensed products are canon. Not how it works
Tuskin38:
Nah they're all equally non-canon
DaveyNY:
And when They do use it and we see it in an episode/movie... it becomes Official Canon.
Before that, not so much.
Ovation:
But any “grey zone” material that is never on screen is automatically superseded by whatever material does appear on screen (deleted scenes excepted unless later incorporated into an official on screen production). So before last Thursday, the length of the Enterprise was…ambiguous. Now? It is not.
fireproof78:
Ok.
It's not canon everyone.
I personally love Matt Jefferies' work but mine, or any other fan accolade, will make it canon material, even if officially licensed.
No way, you don’t say! Don’t tell me this moment was supposed to be funny!Comedy.
Okay, so basically as I said: random anachronistic gesture = funny. There’s no other motivator or anything like that. They usually write the Pelia humor as pretty random, but this felt more out of the blue than usual, so I wondered if I missed something.Anachronistic gesture
I get that it was meant to be funny. But wouldn’t it work better if it didn’t break the established internal logic of the show?Comedy. Dragging a chair is funnier that carrying one.
Pelia is a bit quirky and prone to anachronistic sayings.No way, you don’t say! Don’t tell me this moment was supposed to be funny!
Okay, so basically as I said: random anachronistic gesture = funny. There’s no other motivator or anything like that. They usually write the Pelia humor as pretty random, but this felt more out of the blue than usual, so I wondered if I missed something.
I get that it was meant to be funny. But wouldn’t it work better if it didn’t break the established internal logic of the show?
But at least those are intentional call backs to stuff that has occured in previous series or characters from that series.You mean like how SNW has direct ties to Discovery and Lower Decks which have explicitly made references to TOS, TAS, TNG, DS9, Voyager, Enterprise, Picard and the TOS and TNG films between them and therefore have one seamlessly interconnected universe? And soon Academy will also be directly connected to Discovery and Voyager with at least one DS9 and SNW reference so far.
So when they make new ships, and the TOS Connie's Length needs to be listed for it's basic stats like "Dimensional Size".None of that suggests that the older dimensions be scrubbed from books, articles or documentaries about the history of Star Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.