• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x10 - "Hegemony"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    221
Would anyone take seriously a scene with Kirk lying in his bunk soul searching about the weight of command decisions in the middle of a long running space battle with an enemy ship?

Or a star ship captain driven to madness over guilt at losing his crew so he does a kamikaze run out of despair?

Who could take a show like that seriously?
This needs a sarcasm tag.
 
Disagree. It's in the name. "Star" and "New Worlds" implies space exploration, not exploring deep interpersonal back stories that you can see in any other random show. It's cheap and easy. Character development is one thing but it should be only enough to support the underlying interesting premise of human space exploration. Which is just overlooked constantly and is why a lot of star trek fails. Nobody cares about Picard's inner struggles with his childhood as he tends to his vineyard :p - it's boring and has nothing to do with stars or space. So they stop watching. Then the show is cancelled.

So, producers, make more episodes like this one. :techman: Enough of the overdone backstory, childhoods, flashbacks - it's easy to do, but reallllly stupid. Thanks!

What a lot of silly things to say. Really.
 
But what if I want to watch a show where the biggest plot development is the crew learning the fifth planet in a new star system contains an unusually large percentage of uranium deposits?

Does there really have to be a crew? If you wrote it about an unmanned probe we could have the Space and exploration stuff without all the human nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
In the mirror universe? The climax of season 3 was “it was caused by someone crying”
Season 3 was "The galaxy is threatened by a unique anomaly that only Burnham can fix for some reason". Season 4 was "the galaxy is threatened by a unique anomaly that only Burnham can fix for some reason, but it's a TNG two parter stretched out to ten episodes".
 
In the mirror universe? The climax of season 3 was “it was caused by someone crying”
TMP: the crisis was caused by someone in an existential crisis.

Yeah, it sounds silly if you summarize so simply.

Nah. It was caused by an alien who through exposure to an exotic element caused a psychic wave to tear through subspace rendering Dilithium inert. You know, Star Trek.
That's better.
 
In the mirror universe? The climax of season 3 was “it was caused by someone crying”

Having lost my grandmother about a year before DIS S3 started and having lost my mother about seven months after DIS S3 ended, I gotta say -- I relate pretty deeply to the idea of a grief so profound it tore the galaxy apart.

I'm sorry you were unwilling to open yourself up to a story about real human emotion.

Season 3 was "The galaxy is threatened by a unique anomaly that only Burnham can fix for some reason".

Um, no. The galaxy was not "threatened by a unique anomaly." The Burn had happened well over a hundred years before S3 took place; it was not the current threat, the actions of the Emerald Chain was. Burnham was not involved in the part of the plot that dealt with the origins of the Burn -- she fought the Emerald Chain for control of the Discovery.

Season 4 was "the galaxy is threatened by a unique anomaly that only Burnham can fix for some reason,

Nope. Burnham was part of a team that figured out how to communicate with Species 10-C. She was the leader and the captain, but she was no more the only person able to figure things out than Kirk or Picard or Sisko or Janeway.

Seriously, if you're going to frame the plots dismissively, at least frame them accurately.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top