• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x08 - "Under the Cloak of War"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    222
Oh, no, I didn't forget. That crap is seared into my being. I just found the Section 31 and AI stuff to be even dumber.

Wasting Lorca's potential on a Mirror Universe reveal was offensive to me as a fan. But the Section 31 and AI garbage was even stupider and lazy.

Agreed. It's why until PICARD season 2, DISCO season 2 was the worst season in the franchise. Really, only Pike made it bearable.
 
After DS9 and ENT I stopped caring. Hijacking almost an entire season of DSC to bring back Section 31 is one of the reasons that series is my absolute least-favorite Star Trek show.

While I dislike the second half of S2 DISCO for other reasons, the AI & S31 stuff did serve a purpose. There had to be a reason to send the ship forward & a set up for Yeoh's show.

I don't think either was particularly well done, but there was a reason.

FWIW, the first half of S2 is my favorite DISCO.
 
Where did Jackoverfull say they would be ok with that?
They said they’d want him to have a trial. That’s not being free.

Despite the fact I quoted Jackoverfull's statement, mine was a general statement about anyone who would be fine with such a thing. If it came across as saying him specifically, my apologies. I should have been clearer.


Except the Federation didn’t know he ordered the killings, it’s explained in the episode. He lied and blamed that on his underlings, and claimed that he was appalled at their behaviour.

And at the very least, Dak'Rah should not have been given such a position in the Federation because of his previous records, which was stated in the episode... at least three things. (A starbase, Athos colony, and another one Ortegas mentioned.)

And how convenient that Dak'Rah killed the only three people who could have corroborated his story.

This again shows my point earlier about the good and bad of the Federation... the idealism and the lack of seeing reality. The Federation was naive at best and incompetant at worst with everything about Dak'Rah.
 
So you really think that the system should have tried to rehabilitate Ted Bundy? Or Jeffrey Dahmer? John Wayne Gacy?

Or how about those various people who have murdered children in schools?

How about Jim Jones?

Or maybe Hitler didn't deserve to die?

I agree that life is not always black and white, but there are some people that are just plain evil and deserve to be killed. If for no other reason than to stop them from killing innocent people.
I get what you're saying, but it easily becomes a slippery slope. Also, how many death penalty cases get proved innocent after it's too late? Lock them away? Absolutely. But death is final. And we humans can give that verdict out too easily.
 
So you really think that the system should have tried to rehabilitate Ted Bundy? Or Jeffrey Dahmer? John Wayne Gacy?

Or how about those various people who have murdered children in schools?

How about Jim Jones?

Or maybe Hitler didn't deserve to die?

I agree that life is not always black and white, but there are some people that are just plain evil and deserve to be killed. If for no other reason than to stop them from killing innocent people.
“Mercy to the wicked is cruelty to the innocent.”
 
And that's a good thing? I certainly wouldn't have shed any tears had Wernher von Braun caught a bullet at some point.
I was just stating a fact.
So you really think that the system should have tried to rehabilitate Ted Bundy? Or Jeffrey Dahmer? John Wayne Gacy?

Or how about those various people who have murdered children in schools?

How about Jim Jones?

Or maybe Hitler didn't deserve to die?

I agree that life is not always black and white, but there are some people that are just plain evil and deserve to be killed. If for no other reason than to stop them from killing innocent people.
You are totally missing the point. And more murder doesn’t “solve” murder.

Also, as written above, the ambassador was not threatening any more lives at that point.
 
I get what you're saying, but it easily becomes a slippery slope. Also, how many death penalty cases get proved innocent after it's too late? Lock them away? Absolutely. But death is final. And we humans can give that verdict out too easily.

I completely agree with and am perfectly fine with there being proof before a death penalty. And all the people I mentioned were proven mass murderers.

But I especially cross the line with children. Why the hell should someone be able to live in prison, getting three meals a day, breathing air, being able to read whatever they want after they kill children? Children who'll never be able to enjoy food again, read again, play again, breathe again... live again? They robbed those kids of not just their future, but our species' future. Who knows what those murdered kids would have accomplished... could have been scientists who make incredible breakthroughs like cures for cancer or diabetes, or a paramedic saving many lives over the course of their own.
 
If M'Benga killed in self-defense, it wasn't murder in most meaningful senses.

The scene is presented to deliberately obscure how the actual killing takes place.

I'm just stating facts.
 
Last edited:
I was just stating a fact.
You are totally missing the point. And more murder doesn’t “solve” murder.

Also, as written above, the ambassador was not threatening any more lives at that point.

And you are missing the point. It wasn't murder. It was justice. Just like those examples I listed above.

And actually, it looks like Dak'Rah was threatening M'Benga. So yes, he was threatening more lives.
 
Whatever M'Benga did it wasn't cold-blooded murder. I doubt even Lt. Columbo could execute a successful arrest and charge of someone like M'Benga for what happened behind that frosted wall paneling.
 
And you are missing the point. It wasn't murder. It was justice. Just like those examples I listed above.

Again, missing the point of how they presented the story. It may have been justice rather than murder. It may have been a man in an unbalanced state of mind that different people might judge either capable of responsibility or not. Or, it may have been murder of some kind.*

You know what? It may be possible to make an educated guess about the intention of the storytellers in this instance - it's in plain sight. Or you could at least argue that it is. But the thing that cannot be argued with is that they chose not to give the audience the critical information necessary for them to know for certain.

*"Murder" is primarily a legal term, and what it means depends on many things. I think people in this topic are holding it to mean some kind of premeditated act for which M'Benga (or Rah) is morally responsible and probably legally culpable.
 
I just wish the Klingon was less cartoon-y.
That's a unique take on the performance. Thought there were layers myself. The "good" Klingon who has seen the light is partially false. An identity Rah has created for himself. Underneath is the man who gave the kill orders for anyone not a Klingon soldier. And the man who ran and built a new persona on a lie.
 
"I'm fine."

At one and the same time the most unbelievable line of dialogue and the most convincing. In a way...M'Benga isn't. He's going to live with plunging that d'ktagh into Rah no matter who first grabbed it and initiated the struggle. And yet, I can believe him. The monster has been silenced. And we've all been in that moment when no, things AREN'T "fine" but they're okay for now.

And sometimes the now is all that's needed to recuperate from experiencing trauma.
 
I'd say that Rah is a man who is hiding from who he is and what he did. He hasn't accepted moral responsibility within himself for his actions. This is part of what torments M'Benga - "You make it look easy."

What Rah has done, is to commit himself with determination to a path that he believes balances out his past. He didn't choose it with clean hands - it's his path to a rehabilitated reputation and reentry into some cultural/political elite, if not his own - and his self-justifications are facile. When he's challenged directly with losing all that, he reverts to his old ways.
 
Last edited:
I would like to say, I personally had kind of a small re-evaluation of the episode since I saw it yesterday and thought more about it since then.

What really didn't gel with me was how the goofy, M'Benga as a Jack Reacher/John Wick power fantasy and a trope-y Hollywood badguy really clashed with the more serious war tone.

It wasn't as bad as in the season premiere with the slo-mo fistfights against mooks forgetting they have knifes and guns. But still.

However - in total I would put it up a notch, because the war itself was depicted absolutely perfect. No shooty-shooty action glory. But a constant noise on the background. And young soldiers being rotated in, and carried back out again. And the people being aware of the necessity of it (protecting their home), while still seeing the audacious human costs and senselessness of the situation itself. In this regard it was better than most other portrayals of a "necessary" war of good vs evil in sci-fi, and certainly the best portrayal of the DISCO war.

So in the end I would still put this one in the "firmly good" category of episodes. And even if not completely perfect, it absolutely elevates the series as a whole to also tackle such serious episodes so well.
 
Last edited:
Yes - their example of how a peaceful Klingon went mad and attached a war veteran who had to fight for his life [according to the investigation]. Nobody is spending a lot of time on this one.
Or indeed a traumatized vet now acing as CMO on the flagship kinda went a little stabby...
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top