I'm not sure what you mean. Discovery was constantly member-berrying.
I'm asking for a show that doesn't do that. Or at least on very limited basis.
If you were attached to Klingons as they used to be, DSC was not kind to you from day one. (I’m trying to be unbiased) If you had certain opinions of Starfleet, or the look of that era, it was not kind to you with its radical interpretations. If you were into Trek-Tech, the mushroom drive and Klingon designs likely wouldn’t sit well. If you remembered Voyager being stuck, it didn’t sit well.
Like I said, it depends on your point of view on a bunch of things, but one thing that was true about DSC from day one was that it was at least as interested in subverting expectation or running in direct opposition to some accepted things, as it was in pulling references from the parent show.
I actually think I would *maybe* enjoyed DSC more and stuck with it, if I didn’t already like Trek and was familiar with its past. This is especially true when Control turned up, and I had already suffered that in the Trek books.
I actually tried coming back with the Time Jump, and quite liked some of it, but that time it just failed to hold my attention, despite trying to do some pretty cool things. May have just been me that year — Foundation fell into exactly the same problem, and as a show *feels* very very similar to DSC. Despite me having very little attachment to those books. My favourite thing in that show was watching William Russell’s son do his thing. He is an excellent actor, but like DSC, it just couldn’t hold my attention.