I would say it's likely his job to apprehend who he's told to apprehend, and not ask questions. If she's back out there on the floor, then the issue was resolved, or whatever happened is above his pay grade.
Would the logical subsumtion then not be A) He checks in with operations asking if the person that they apprehended now being on the stage is ok, and when operations does not reply then either B1) he himself goes to operations, or B2) he asks a colleague to check on them, which in either case leads us inevitably to the result of it being discovered that they have been rendered unconscious?
You are being VERY lenient with the production staff here. If it was just this scene it would not really have bothered me, but this was actually an irrelevant one by itself. There were several others, the big one being the two Picards wandering outside for no reason, where Soong just happens to be waiting with a car to mow them down, even though there would have been no why he could have ascertained them leaving the building. Production realized how horrible the scene is since the line that it will be shorter if they go outside, was obviously added in post in an attempt to salvage the scene.
Ethics don't go nearly as far as a big bank account.
At a certain point, outrage is is going to cost you more, then lack of ethics. Since you are drying up other avenues of funding.
The following kinda goes beyond the scope of this thread
One of the deepest flaws of our society (and I'm speaking of Western nations here) is that our short term gains have been overriding our long term brains. There are corrupt people everywhere at the higher levels of corporate organizing, but it doesn't matter so long as they keep the line of the stock market moving up.
No difference between western and non-western nations. Looks at China and India buying up the cheap Russian oil. With the Indian governement going so far as to ask why they should refuse to buy cheap oil for their people at a discount.
There is no black and white, only grey. Take short selling as an example. On the one hand it most definitively is used as a weapon, however it is also the only way for a pension fund to avoid losing grandma and grandpa's life savings during falling markets.
Look at the US and its handling of the pandemic, and how profit became far, far more important than the health of workers. You'd think it would be unethical to open schools, push people back to work, in the midst of a pandemic but here we are, and the strains keep getting more vicious, or more communicable.
Difficult. My cousin one the one hand would have preferred schools stayed closed for health reasons, however she was also shocked to find out that many of the grade one pupils she deals with do not know how to tie their shoe laces. When she challenged the parents, the response she usually got back was that Kindergarden was closed for two years. If parents are not willing to teach their kids how to tie up shoes, how well do you think they taught their children to count? This generation of pandemic kids is going to be divided into those who were well parented, and can exploit the situation, and those who were handed an iPad to watch YouTube videos. Although, sometimes it if unfair to just generally state that certain parents lack effort. Some simple do not have the needed skills. I am often flabbergasted how many adults lack elementary school math abilities. For many it is not that they do not want to teach their kids, they can't.
