Micheal was right, the war was going to happen no matter what, there was a slim chance of stopping it before it began but then there would be no overarching storyline to use as a background for the show.
This is the problem with these kinds of characters. She was right (about the Klingons) and Georgiou had to be the idiot (Yeoh deserved better), in order for Burnham to mutiny.
I dunno. I think there is a possibility that if Georgiou's plan had been followed, T'Kuvma might not have fired the first shot. It's possible that he felt he needed to demonstrate Federation hostility towards the Great Houses before they would have united under his leadership against the UFP.
I say "possible," because I don't think there's any way of knowing with certainty. It is
possible that Georgiou's plan may have worked and that Burnham's illegal order to lock weapons on the Sarcophagus Ship is what prompted T'Kuvma to fire the first shot. It is also
possible that T'Kuvma was going to fire anyway.
I suspect that Burnham is going to have to live with that uncertainty for the rest of her life.
Too much focus on the Klingons yakking at each other, I guess it was necessary for any new viewers to the franchise but it was painful to watch the actors/actresses deliver the guttural dialogue and slowed things down in a bad way.
*shrugs* It reminded me of all those scenes in Dothraki from Season One of
Game of Thrones. It didn't bother me, and I felt it added greater emphasis to the idea that Klingons really are a distinct culture whose values are coming into conflict with the Federation's, not just Shakespearean actors with heavy metal rock costumes and 80s hair.
Bit risky adding holograms to a show set 10 years before TOS if you ask me, its not really necessary and was bound to raise a few eyebrows, I suspect they just added it because it looked cool even though it brought doubt to the whole "Prime Universe Timeline" that the show is meant to be based in.
I think there comes a point where we just have to accept that a television program depicting "the future" made in 2017 is going to depict it differently from a television program depicting "the future" made in 1967, and suspend our disbelief.
When will Admirals learn not to broadcast which ship they are on, its such a beginner mistake.
Good point!
I've been wondering the same actually.
Though, I'd still prefer to think of that exchange as being between Burnham and "the left behind remnant of Sarek" rather than a long distance communication... unless something explicitly confirms the opposite.
I hated the idea that Sarek could communicate with her over vast distances. I despise when they introduce super powers to fill a plot need.
I don't really like the idea of mind melds opening up the possibility for telepathic communication across interstellar distances either, but that ship sailed in 2005 when Trip and T'Pol started telepathically communicating with The Power Of Love. And that's not counting "The Immunity Syndrome," where Spock telepathically sensed the deaths of every Vulcan on the USS
Intrepid across interstellar distances. So there are canonical precedents for this.
I'd preferred it if they didn't have ready rooms, especially ones as large as a ship's bridge. No ready rooms in ENT or TOS, so how did they appear here?
Archer had a ready room.
Personally, if I'm running DSC, I'd have a ready room. That TOS lacked one is an exceedingly minor issue, and the creative integrity of this show and its need for a private "captain's space" for the scenes between Burnham and Georgiou, are more important than maintaining continuity with every unverified fan assumption about TOS.
The definition of irony is the writer of "The Measure of a Man" criticizing someone else's script for being too on-the-nose.
So are we supposed to like Burnham? As the main protagonist of the show I would assume so.
I dunno. Are we supposed to like Agent Carrie Mathison on
Homeland? Are we supposed to like Peggy Olson on
Mad Men? Daenerys Targaryen on
Game of Thrones? Piper Chapman on
Orange is the New Black? Jessica on
Jessica Jones?
Are we supposed to like Tony on
The Sopranos? Walter White on
Breaking Bad, BoJack on
BoJack Horseman, the title character on
Dexter, Frank and Claire Underwood on
House of Cards?
Are we supposed to like the title characters of
Hamlet or
King Lear? Are we supposed to root for Harry in
Henry V?
Star Trek: Discovery is an attempt to bring
Star Trek into the world of high-brow prestige drama, and it's not always out to have simplistic answers about who we're supposed to like and root for.
The Klingon ship didn't seem all that sound. One torpedo split it in two with the shields down.
A single photon torpedo is supposed to be able to utterly devastate a ship if it detonates without being thwarted by deflector shields. A single photon torpedo crippled
Qo'noS One in
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country, and completely destroyed a Borg scout ship in "Dark Frontier, Part I" (VOY).
From Starfleet's perspective most officers probably had no clue what cloaking devices were or how they worked. Any Romulan cloaking technology encountered by the United Earth Starfleet and ships like Enterprise NX-01 would likely have been classified or downplayed as rumor, and in either case Federation officers living 100 years later wouldn't have a history of encountering cloaking technology except as old, unproven stories or theory.
Yeah, I would assume that Archer had information on Suliban cloaking technology classified and hidden away to protect the timeline--assuming any of their tech even
worked after "Storm Front, Part II," of course.
Meanwhile, I just think the Suliban having cloaking devices was a shit idea in the first place and I'm just as happy for DSC to ignore it entirely.
First, he likely would've had sent a shuttle to begin with. If the computer can handle a rocket suit at 12,000 kph, it should be able to maneuver a shuttle in there.
The impression I got was that they felt it likely that the source of the sensor blind spot would detect an incoming shuttlecraft, but that a single humanoid in an EVA suit would stand a better chance of evading detection.
Or some sort of drone/probe.
Can't do that; they knew something was jamming remote transmissions. Probe would have been cut off from the ship.