• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Shatner speaks....

You are talking about the series while it was being first aired. A series that was not very successful (under that metric). But later, it became more. So, while I agree with you on one hand, I disagree that they (the others) are not integral to what the series became.

They weren't integral in the slightest. Star Trek became a phenomenon in syndication well before there was any franchise to speak of.
 
Gilligan claims you were physically abusive backstage and that Mary Ann refused to come out of her hut unless you were on set and in plain view of the crew.

That's not the first time I've heard that.

So, okay, you're the busiest employee at a job for three years. You see one guy maybe once or twice a week during that time, and not even every week (Takei missed a lot of episodes). You don't get to know him. The job ends, you don't see the guy for ten years until you start working with him again on and off every couple of years, still barely spending any time with him. And, you discover, that the guy doesn't even like you! So, if 17 years after you last saw this part-time employee who didn't like you, the guy gets married and he invites you...would you go??? If you say yes, you're either the greatest damned guy on the planet or I'm calling bullshit. I wouldn't even expect to be invited.

Good post, but that part alone sounds like a Seinfeld episode. Why do I keep imagining George Constanza complaining about someone not remembering him?

A small thing to had to that, wasn't Bill going through his first divorce during season 3? I'd imagine that would consume his mind a lot, not really feeling like chumming about the workplace with that going on. But I may be wrong there, but if about 33% of this time he has that turmoil going on, he may have been distant and unfriendly. He also had his father's death and funeral in the first season, that also can distract a person from being the office life of the party.

Does Walter ever do this? I've heard Doohan and of course George and Nichelle to a lesser extent, but not Walter. And if I had to pick of the 4 of them, he's the best actor, even though Chekov is possibly the worst character of the four of them, i.e. a comic relief type with everything invented in Russia and other silliness forced on him.
 
^^^ Apparently there was an episode of Shatner's "Raw Nerve" (which I never saw and don't know if it ever actually aired) that was recorded with Walter Koenig where the first question out of Shatner's mouth was something to the effect of, "So...Walter...What the fuck?" regarding "The Feud". IIRC, Walter actually admitted that he didn't know Shatner at all, never felt as mistreated and disrespected as the others said they were and was kind of bullied into acting negatively towards Shatner or risk being pushed out of the "2nd Tier Club" of Takei, Nichols and Doohan. I have no idea where I heard/read this, but it definitely stands out in my mind how manufactured a lot of this "outrage" was towards Shatner, and how it snowballed out of control over the years.

Arguably, outside the "big three", Koenig probably had the best career of the rest of them. Writer, director, continued acting as Bester in B5 (a great role for him) - he strikes me as someone who capitalized on his Trek creds rather than sitting back on his ass, telling the same tired old stories at the conventions and milking the residuals (if there were any) without much additional post-Trek effort.
 
Shattner is not or has ever been a superstar or stellar actor. Which is why most folk don't know him for any of the 100+ other oles he has played......but they know him as Kirk.

That much is true, with the caveat that he was quite well-known for a while as Denny Crane.

IIRC, Shatner and Nimoy and Kelley worked together on a daily basis on the original television series - the other actors did not, with Takei being a semi-regular guaranteed maybe half the episodes in a season and in practice came in one day every week or two to film the few scenes in which he'd appear.
 
The series was not structured that way...

You are talking about the series while it was being first aired. A series that was not very successful (under that metric). But later, it became more. So, while I agree with you on one hand, I disagree that they (the others) are not integral to what the series became.

Remove Doohan, Takei, Nicholls and Koenig. The series still roll on, as they were not crucial to its success. You could have swapped them out with other character actors of the period (matching the general demands of the part), and I seriously doubt the series would have missed a step.

Yes, actually I do. During the time I stated I was putting in 65 hour weeks - as a normality. So yes, I do. Now I am more successful and yes, I will travel to attend an old "team" member's occasion at times. I would not say I do not know them at all. I might say I do not know them well. But hundreds of hours spent together?....how could I say I do not know them? That's silly. You spend years on the same project you don't have that option.
Shatner and Takei did not work closely over the course of the three seasons, as Takei was not always on set, or in the episode. Next, his stint on The Green Berets pushed him to the edges due to his absence. Even on the animated series, Shatner and Takei never performed their voice parts together, so again, they were not real co-workers like full time employees.

Moving on to the movies, pay close attention to every scene where they are on screen together. Not only is it minimal, but during the course of a production, actors are not always relating to one another, off doing something else, or waiting for the next set up. Adding to that, if the relationship was job-related at best (weak as that was), how involved were Shatner and Takei in each others' professional or personal lives?

Yeah - I beg to differ. My father told me (in the early 70's) Kelly and Nimoy were both well know western actors and Doohan had a superior roll in in a previous series Shattner was part of. In fact, I have now seen many of those movies.....MOVIES at least for Kelly - not TV. The Shat man was a single episode kind of guy. I am a super fan of Bill (I have a "Body by Shattner" shirt no less), but seriously his acting "chops" were no better to brag about and frankly, as much as I adore TOS, I can't pretend any of that was stellar acting. Really?
See Ssosmcin's post. Furthermore, Shatner--unlike any of his co-stars--was in high profile tv and movies, no matter the size of the part; from The Defender (Studio One with Ralph Bellamy and Steve McQueen) to Judgement at Nuremberg, he was on a level far above his future Star Trek "add ons," such as Takei.



You talk about the show as aired - important....but as aired it's not important. The ST phenom occurred after it was canceled.
If there was not serious interest / heat regarding the series, it would have died after season 1, or 2. Before the big syndication boom, Filmation Associates already had an interest in adapting the series as a cartoon, with talks starting in 1969. At the time, animated adaptations of TV or movies was usually reserved for productions with strong interest (otherwise, there would be no reason to invest money into a production no one cared about). It may not have enjoyed the ratings of The Beverly Hillbillies, but the interest was there.

At any rate, warp, or speed, we are all talking about the personal feelings of others. And since we don't know Bill or George (or at least I do not), I can't really lay down a judgement.....other than to say I like it better when everyone are friends.

Anyways....it's late. Any way do we argue about such things. Whatever the realities, it is sad when folks don't get along. I wish they could. And I am no0t going to pretend to know the truth.
Well, there's much documentation about the production of TOS, and the convention years to know who spent time trashing another, while the intended victim did not waste his time firing back.

Who comes off as bitter or hateful in that case?


The pre-Trek careers of Shatner, Nimoy and Kelley and Doohan were quite different from each other. Kelley was a character actor who primarily worked in Westerns in the role of the heavy. Not really a headliner. Like actors such as Nehemiah Persoff, Kelley was steadily employed, but most people wouldn't know him by name. Doohan played many small parts. I still sport him in many old shows, but never in anything that stands out other than it's James Doohan. Nimoy took a while to get the TV career going, but again, didn't make a huge splash pre-Trek. A good actor who found plentiful work, he didn't gain recognition until Star Trek. Just compare his parts in the same shows Shatner did: Twilight Zone, Shatner was a lead twice. Nimoy: supporting small part one time. The Man from UNCLE: Shatner was the lead guest star. Nimoy played a smaller part as a enemy agent. Shatner usually carried the load in his parts. Nimoy was usually down the ladder. So, no, the careers were not equal.

William Shatner's casting was considered a coup at the time. He was the headliner, more famous for his many, many guest roles and stage career. He was often recognized in the press with positive reviews and was considered a fine actor with a big career ahead of him.
True. He was on the rise, and in high profile productions for a reason.
He was the highest paid member of the cast and was given a cut of the series profits (if any). The series was initially structured around his character. Not this and one or two or six others, but his. It was about Captain Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise.

Strong summary.

As a featured player, Takei did not work with Shatner full time. So, really, it wasn't even like working with your staff at the office for 45-60 hours a week. Takei was a part-timer. The guy in the mailroom. Shatner was on set every damned day, working with his co-stars and the guest actors. Unless an episode took place primarily on the bridge, or Sulu was in the landing party, Shatner and Takei didn't really work together that much. And if they barely saw each other, then hey certainly didn't pal around. So, absolutely, when Shatner says he doesn't "know" Takei, he probably really doesn't.

So, okay, you're the busiest employee at a job for three years. You see one guy maybe once or twice a week during that time, and not even every week (Takei missed a lot of episodes). You don't get to know him. The job ends, you don't see the guy for ten years until you start working with him again on and off every couple of years, still barely spending any time with him. And, you discover, that the guy doesn't even like you! So, if 17 years after you last saw this part-time employee who didn't like you, the guy gets married and he invites you...would you go??? If you say yes, you're either the greatest damned guy on the planet or I'm calling bullshit. I wouldn't even expect to be invited.
Well said.

Shatner and Nimoy? Yeah, those guys were (eventually) best friends and did stuff together. Takei? He, Nichelle and Walter (and even Doohan), were part-timers at an old job. They weren't Shatner's friends or One Big Happy Family. The difference is, Shatner never stopped getting work. And that is the basis of the bad feelings.
That, and the realization that Kirk--as portrayed by Shatner--was one of the faces of the series, its promotion and merchandising. That spoke volumes, but the reason was easy to understand: it was due to Shatner's performance, & how the audience responded to the actor's investment into a character that turned out to be one of the most appealing in TV history up to that time, and certainly after the TOS years.

So, if Takei has a bone to pick, start with the audience. It was their support that turned the leads into big stars.
 
I have to admit I've never quite understood this idea some fans seem to have that, since their characters were pals on the show, the actors are under some kind of obligation to be pals IRL.
 
I have to admit I've never quite understood this idea some fans seem to have that, since their characters were pals on the show, the actors are under some kind of obligation to be pals IRL.

No obligation, but it's been popularized with the evolution of ensemble TV shows. Shows like Mission Impossible, Happy Days, Cheers, Friends (appropriately), etc. had casts that keep in touch to this day. It's not a rule, but their hangouts are pretty public. They also lasted much longer than TOS, so there's more time to bond.

TOS was not an ensemble, though all of its spinoffs were. I suspect that because we see crews like TNG and VOY etc. all chummy and such, that we get surprised that TOS wasn't like that behind the scenes. But just like those other shows, the spinoffs all had more work time to bond.

It's perfectly fine if TOS was just a job. I think sometimes we fans project what we want to see onto them, though. And friendships did indeed grow out of it: Takei and Koenig are BFFs, and we know about Shatner, Nimoy, and Kelley. The two circles don't have to intersect, though Nimoy was a friend to all.
 
I have to admit I've never quite understood this idea some fans seem to have that, since their characters were pals on the show, the actors are under some kind of obligation to be pals IRL.

Some fans want to think that the good feelings they get from watching a tv series must automatically transfer to the performers' personal lives. It happens for some productions, but the opposite happens often (Jonas, you should know regarding "the movie star"). In situations where you have series stars and minor players who do not work together often, they are not always the best of friends, or even chummy beyond saying hello at the start of the day's work.

...then you have the vindictive types who feel something--a lot of somethings are owed to them (for no valid reason), either in the material, financial or emotional sense.
 
I think that things like the playful blooper reels as well as some books and articles written in the seventies created a feeling (illusion) of cast chumminess amongst some fans.
 
It does speak to the cast's professionalism that nothing of whatever friction that existed ever translated to the screen.
 
To Be Takei actually made me think less of George, who came across to me as being insensitive and sometimes callous.

What's most telling is he keeps inviting Bill to things after bashing him, then can feign being hurt when Bill doesn't show. Oh boo hoo hoo.
 
Last edited:
Well, I do understand why many fans want to believe the cast were pals or should have been. A lot of the reference material played up the comradeship and fun. David Gerrold called it the happiest set in Hollywood in his books, I think (I don't have them handy) and the blooper reels made it look like filming Star Trek was one three year long party. Only "the feud" between Shatner and Nimoy, which was really downplayed in the 70's, was kinda known. Gerrold also talked about some cast dissension about how some wanted more to do, which was quashed by Roddenberry writing "the letter." But, from what I recall, the tell all books were the real start of the complaints going public. I can't speak on what any of the cast might have said at conventions back then, I didn't go to any. But in print, it waited until the biographies.

Was Shatner an egotistical jerk? Maybe. If so, fine, Takei et al had a right to be pissed about it. But it was decades ago. I had a shitty time in high school, but I graduated in 1986. I'm not even slightly mad at anyone anymore. Not even the people I remember. Why?

I got over it. I lived my life. I moved on. Like a grown up.

Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
Are the cast members of DS9 on good terms with one another?

From what I've heard, they were more just a professional ensemble. They got along well and worked well together, but they didn't bond the way the TNG cast did. And that's fine. I think casts being friends outside of work is more the exception than the rule, anyway.

Alexander Siddig and Nana Visitor got divorced after the run of the show, but I have no idea if that was amicable or not. I'd imagine they have to get along to a certain extent, since they have a child together.
 
IIRC, Shatner and Nimoy and Kelley worked together on a daily basis on the original television series - the other actors did not, with Takei being a semi-regular guaranteed maybe half the episodes in a season and in practice came in one day every week or two to film the few scenes in which he'd appear.

Well, if that is the case, I can see Shattner's point of view a bit clearer.
 
To Be Takei actually made me think less of George, who came across to me as having as being insensitive and sometimes callous.

What's most telling is he keeps inviting Bill to things after bashing him, then can feign being hurt when Bill doesn't show. Oh boo hoo hoo.

Yep. I felt the same after watching the documentary.
 
Well, I do understand why many fans want to believe the cast were pals or should have been. A lot of the reference material played up the comradeship and fun. David Gerrold called it the happiest set in Hollywood in his books, I think (I don't have them handy) and the blooper reels made it look like filming Star Trek was one three year long party. Only "the feud" between Shatner and Nimoy, which was really downplayed in the 70's, was kinda known. Gerrold also talked about some cast dissension about how some wanted more to do, which was quashed by Roddenberry writing "the letter." But, from what I recall, the tell all books were the real start of the complaints going public. I can't speak on what any of the cast might have said at conventions back then, I didn't go to any. But in print, it waited until the biographies.

Was Shatner an egotistical jerk? Maybe. If so, fine, Takei et al had a right to be pissed about it. But it was decades ago. I had a shitty time in high school, but I graduated in 1986. I'm not even slightly mad at anyone anymore. Not even the people I remember. Why?

I got over it. I lived my life. I moved on. Like a grown up.

Just sayin'.

You communicate better than I.

I think it is natural for folks to think co-stars are "pals". Your impressions of a person are made by way you see if them. I recall when I was younger I saw an interview with "The Professor" from Gilligan's island. He didn't even like science. It was weird to me - and disappointing - and an eye opener. Adam and Jamie (Myth Guys) actually took time out to address rumors about them hating each other and were not friends anymore. They basically revealed that they are not "pals" and never really were....but don't hate each other. They work together at the same job. They respect each other. But they don't "hang out" with each other.

As far as the convention appearances go in the 70's, I never heard negative things at appearances. In fact, I think you are right....didn't hear anything until the "tell alls". But I only went to a few conventions. The only one with Shattner - he cancelled (I always guessed it was a publicity stunt because they waited until we were all there before announcing it). It wasn't until after the movies I heard negative things. SO I naturally assumed that is were things fell off. *Shrug* It would be nice if folks just got along.
 
I would love it if my favorite Trek stars were all chummy. I'm fine with professional, though. One can be professional, while maintaining a friendly atmosphere. It's the rancor we see between the second tier characters and Bill, that's what irks me, because when you look at the old footage, when you hear the producers and directors, and other personnel on set during the original series, it appears that everyone got alone fine, even if they weren't all best pals.

What they don't seem to realize is that if it were not for Bill Shatner, their jobs wouldn't have existed.
 
It's never sat well with me how Shatner keeps saying "I don't know the man" about Takei! I mean he worked with him for three years on Trek then six movies! Yes, maybe he didn't become friends with him or get to know the man inside and out but he can't say I never knew him! Why not just say we never hit it off or he doesn't really like me as such...although I agree it's Takei that is and has been the hostile force in the feud and continues to make the problem worse!
JB
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top