Try rereading the post.How were the tng klingons not realistic?
Try rereading the post.How were the tng klingons not realistic?
All one culture is not realistic.How were the tng klingons not realistic?
All one culture is not realistic.
If Discovery's Klingon makeup had changed as subtly as the TNG makeup did over the years, no one would've noticed or cared.Oh please the change wasn't that drastic. To somehow try and claim TNG was a 'foundation', when in fact they changed the look for every single film that followed; and even in TNG updated the look each season...yeah, give me a break.
Not lately. Travel restrictions, you know?Have you ever been to an alien world?
Maybe. The point is that change is a part of Trek's history, big and small. Treating one as worse than the other strikes me as incongruent, at best.If Discovery's Klingon makeup had changed as subtly as the TNG makeup did over the years, no one would've noticed or cared.
Oh please the change wasn't that drastic. To somehow try and claim TNG was a 'foundation', when in fact they changed the look for every single film that followed; and even in TNG updated the look each season...yeah, give me a break.
TNG's Klingon design was far more established than the original look, after three 26-eps-a-year series with a Klingon as a main character. Really any Klingon that looks dramatically different to Worf will not be accepted if there's an implication that Worf must look dramatically different as well.Not lately. Travel restrictions, you know?
Maybe. The point is that change is a part of Trek's history, big and small. Treating one as worse than the other strikes me as incongruent, at best.
And?
I expect variety in the Klingons, not one phenotype. ENT provides all the explanation needed, including Discovery's Klingons.
Accept the changes to Klingon makeup from 1979 to 2005 weren't all that subtle; so you proceed on a false assumption to begin with.If Discovery's Klingon makeup had changed as subtly as the TNG makeup did over the years, no one would've noticed or cared.
Well, tell us!I know the real reason for the change.
Accept the changes to Klingon makeup from 1979 to 2005 weren't all that subtle; so you proceed on a false assumption to begin with.
https://images.app.goo.gl/tYFLS4whnYp2Agw88
The changes from top to tng weren't thst extensive. I mean std had purple klingons lol. They also had double sets of nostrils. Where th heck did that come from? Lol.
That's not a change in the design of Klingon makeup, that's different people looking different.Accept the changes to Klingon makeup from 1979 to 2005 weren't all that subtle; so you proceed on a false assumption to begin with.
https://images.app.goo.gl/tYFLS4whnYp2Agw88
Ego my friend...it was all creative Ego...Well, tell us!
Exactly. They need to put the purple/grey, bald giant head quad nostril in there. Guess which one is gonna stick out like a sore thumb???That's not a change in the design of Klingon makeup, that's different people looking different.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.