One of the Kyles: No relation.Captain Larry: This is my Transporter Chief Kyle and this is my other Transporter Chief Kyle."
Let the ships begin.This new Kyle is kind of cute... is that relevant?
One L. No sense of humor.One of the Kyles: No relation.
Ship it elsewhere.Let the ships begin.
I always thought his name was Winston Kyle. Was that not from any credits or scripts, and just from the books?
I'm just surprised of everyone saying he was just an extra or whatever. And they dont care......YET here we are possibly seeing this character that no one cares about in this show. WHY?? if he is such a stupid non character why did they include him in the show??? Its puzzling to me.
And ignore the race baiting trouble makers. I've been accused of the same thing for daring to suggest that James Bond should stay as he is written in the novels. You won't believe the lengths to which people go to try and justify changing what is clearly written in black and white by an author in order to satisfy their social agenda.
His name's 'Chief Other Kyle'.
Case in point. The Klingons were completely overhauled for Discovery. Why???
Didn't sound that way when you were answering Dar70. Regardless the klingon portrayal in STD was terrible. They looked like completely different aliens. They barely acted like klingons.
If Discovery's Klingon makeup had changed as subtly as the TNG makeup did over the years, no one would've noticed or cared.
I've always taken the Marvel approach.
If you want a character of a different race as a character, you create a new one.
I don’t think keeping Trek continuity as tight as possible makes it fun. It makes watching the show a chore. But I think there are those who take keeping continuity far too seriously.
There already was a black Nick Fury (who looked exactly like Jackson) in Marvel‘s Ultimate line since 2001.As for the Marvel Universe films themselves, hasn't Samuel L. Jackson been portraying caucasian comic book hero, Nick Fury?
Quite so, shrill complaints are the fire in which we burn.Time is not standing still. No amount of shrill complaints will change that.
This is true. Even if it wasnt it still ok because the mcu movie continuity was just starting and Samual Jackson was the first person to play him in that universe. Now if they went and recast Fury later as a caucasian. Yeah.....I'm gonna have an issue with that.There already was a black Nick Fury (who looked exactly like Jackson) in Marvel‘s Ultimate line since 2001.
HahahaSpeaking as an Asian myself, I think maybe they could have just named this character Sulu and we wouldn't have all this controversy among the fandom.
Which he had a right to do as he was the author of the story. Writers coming along 60 years later should write their own stories and characters if they want to advance a different agenda.The problem is that Ian Fleming wrote James Bond as white in order to advance a social agenda, too.
You're not advancing equality when you try and change iconic characters like James Bond into something that is the total opposite of who they are. You're only showing a complete lack of creativity. No Time To Die had a black woman playing Nomi as secret agent 007 and showed that Q was a homosexual. None of these developments were a contradiction of what Fleming wrote as Nomi was a new character and the character of Q was never in the novels. Thankfully the custodians of the series aren't lacking in creativity.Any choice you make will advance a social agenda, so why not make the social agenda you advance one of equality?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.