Elevator small talkThat's still kinda the same ballpark IMHO![]()
She didn't seem overly bothered and factually pointed out it was still regulation. Very Vulcan response.I'm not building a court case again Star Trek characters. He made a bloody Vulcan self-conscious about her hair. It's just an opinion
What's overly bothered for a Vulcan look like? Pointing out that it hadn't violated any regulations implies she was made to think he was suggesting it might have. I don't think he was suggesting that. It was an offhand comment, about her hair, that she took more seriously than it was intended, but it's maybe better left unsaid altogether, because it's drawing attention to her looks, & now she has to address them needlesslyShe didn't seem overly bothered and factually pointed out it was still regulation. Very Vulcan response.

That is the key here, empathy for a not-perfect character who we know is not evil and would not intentionally hurt, exploit, or insult anybody.just to be liked, has a little understandable context, that I can extend a modicum of empathy to, given he's otherwise a decent person.
But would intentionally deceive and manipulate someone (not just through omission of detail, but through blatant fabrication when asked direct questions) who he was trying to foster a romantic relationship with, as shown?That is the key here, empathy for a not-perfect character who we know is not evil and would not intentionally hurt, exploit, or insult anybody.

Wasn't it established before this episode that he is very bad at socializing with women he's interested in? Something with a violin player on a beach?
He's awkward, overwhelmed, leaning into creepiness, but he's not a bad guy, not a villain in the episode. Clumsy and all, yes, but he never had bad intentions.
That's untrue.
If Geordi had been simply using the hologram for informational purposes, then he would not have had the computer synthesize a personality for it, so that he could—in his own words—get personal on the holodeck, after he had been soundly rejected by his earlier date and had used Guinan as a sounding board about seemingly being unable to hit it off with women.
The hologram acted that way only because Geordi ordered the computer to synthesize the personality, an act completely unnecessary had he only been using the hologram to obtain information.
P.S. That's not remotely close to deus ex machina.
As I said above, I understand Geordi not wanting to quite provide all of the detail regarding the events of "Booby Trap", but it might have gone a long way to thawing things with him and Leah if he'd answered the question reasonably honestly ("I consulted it while trying to resolve a crisis the ship was experiencing"). And if he'd been able to thaw them a bit via honesty then perhaps he could have proactively (and with due chagrin) come clean about the rest of it rather than experiencing his personal worst-case scenario.
He gets upset with her because of a situation he did the bulk of the work in creating.
I really don't understand this narrative: "Ah poor Geordi, he's just socially awkward, he's the real victim of the wicked Leah, he just made honest mistakes."
Of course, one can make mistakes. But Geordi clearly doesn't admit his mistakes; instead, he places all the blame on Leah, who is forced (by the writers) to apologize. I'm not sure what for, resentment after discovering Geordi's virtual blow-up doll with her likeness?
Geordi NEVER admits he was wrong, he NEVER apologizes for making Leah uncomfortable. The moral of the episode is: assertive women are always wrong. Men who use any method to get into women's panties are always right. At worst, they're guilty of overenthusiasm. But that's not something they need to apologize for.
Even worse. Leah feels compelled to apologize after being gaslighted by Geordi. It doesn't matter whether she does so in the context of the episode. But the writers clearly tell us that she's done something for which she should apologize.Maybe we watched different versions of the episode? The writers end the episode by having LaForge say she doesn't need to apologize and he does accept some accountability.
So the ending does what you said it should have done, and not only is it not enough but it's "even worse." Ok then.Even worse. Leah feels compelled to apologize after being gaslighted by Geordi. It doesn't matter whether she does so in the context of the episode. But the writers clearly tell us that she's done something for which she should apologize.
But Geordi, who lied to her repeatedly throughout the episode, tricked her into a romantic dinner, ridicules her resentment over discovering his holographic copy, is mysteriously put in a position of moral superiority by the writers, and magnanimously tells Leah that there's no need for her to apologize.
I hope no one tells me for the umpteenth time that all this was normal in the 90s.
No. The writers clearly say "What Leah did was absolutely WRONG, Geordie just did some little mistakes, and he such a nice guy who forgives Leah for her misdeeds."So the ending does what you said it should have done, and not only is it not enough but it's "even worse." Ok then.
As I understand it, he simply had the hologram act like the real person, since he wanted to understand how she THOUGHT when designing the ship. He did not tell it how to act, but simply thought that he had a lot in common with the real person as a result.That's untrue.
If Geordi had been simply using the hologram for informational purposes, then he would not have had the computer synthesize a personality for it, so that he could—in his own words—get personal on the holodeck, after he had been soundly rejected by his earlier date and had used Guinan as a sounding board about seemingly being unable to hit it off with women.
The hologram acted that way only because Geordi ordered the computer to synthesize the personality, an act completely unnecessary had he only been using the hologram to obtain information.
P.S. That's not remotely close to deus ex machina.
This was honestly a very common practice for all TV show writing in those days, & might still be, on occasion. Shows like Lost used to infuriate me with drama being manufactured from characters simply omitting things they know, which would be common to divulge.TNG too often used avoidance to create a plot when candor would disarm a situation instantly. Peak Performance has always annoyed me in that way. Picard could have said "The Enterprise and Hathaway are engaged in a training exercise. Piss off, Ferengi." and that should have been the end of it.
Prior to adding a personality 'representation' it's just a computer talking in a dry, slow monotone. Geordi doesn't even ask for a hologram of Leah intentionally. The computer does it for him to his surprise. After it did, he requested an upgrade hoping it would give more useful answers and a more natural interaction rather than be a creepy statue that stares blankly at him between questions. Adding a personality made the hologram less annoying. Maybe to you that's completely unnecessary, but it wouldn't be to everyone. Especially if he's looking for 'someone' to bounce ideas off of and be challenged which makes the debate records relevant.

And where is Troi, the counselor/psychologist while Scotty is literally drunk in a holodeck, struggling to fit into a whole new century? Plot convenience trumps everything. She spent more time humoring Mark Twain. It's fair to assume the ship's engine designer is a useful collaboration, even beyond his own teamAgain, where's the rest of his engineering staff? Are they totally useless?![]()
Not to the exclusion of his own team, who are totally absent.And where is Troi, the counselor/psychologist while Scotty is literally drunk in a holodeck, struggling to fit into a whole new century? Plot convenience trumps everything. She spent more time humoring Mark Twain. It's fair to assume the ship's engine designer is a useful collaboration, even beyond his own team

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.