• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I don't understand the hate Disco gets / still gets.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And I'm sorry, but I'm just not a fan about what I heard about bringing Stacey Abrams in, and I'm a big supporter of her and her political party. I agree that Trek always was political, but there was always a degree of separation between real world events. We need to use the stories to show how certain views can be harmful but going straight to real world politicians and bringing them in seems more likely to drive away the other side rather than keep them engaged and open to change. I know if Giuliani showed up on Trek, I'd probably stop watching that show for good.

They're already complaining about a black woman in charge of the ship. At some point, you have to accept that you have lost a fandom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sci
They're already complaining about a black woman in charge of the ship. At some point, you have to accept that you have lost a fandom.
I still don't know what Abrams specifically adds to Trek though that another black actress (Viola Davis? Lupita Nyongo? There are tons out there that I'm sure are eager to be in Trek) couldn't already bring to the table.

And with politicians, you just never know. If Abrams or any other politician suddenly was exposed for being involved in this or that crime (and this happens every other day with our politicians) suddenly her appearance has made the show feel outdated (and no, I'm not saying I believe Abrams is involved in anything, just using a hypothetical). Look how well all the past praise of Aung San Suu Kyi feels like now, for example.
 
I still don't know what Abrams specifically adds to Trek though that another black actress (Viola Davis? Lupita Nyongo? There are tons out there that I'm sure are eager to be in Trek) couldn't already bring to the table.

I imagine it was just a case of a popular RL celebrity being a Star Trek fan. Something that has led to a lot of guest appearances.

We've had Stephen Hawkins and Doctor Mae Jeminson after all.
 
Both of those were scientific figures, not political/governmental ones.

Then-Prince (now King) Abdullah of Jordan was on Voyager.

And with politicians, you just never know. If Abrams or any other politician suddenly was exposed for being involved in this or that crime (and this happens every other day with our politicians) suddenly her appearance has made the show feel outdated (and no, I'm not saying I believe Abrams is involved in anything, just using a hypothetical). Look how well all the past praise of Aung San Suu Kyi feels like now, for example.

Actors can be exposed too. See, for instance, Stephen Collins, Andy Dick and Jennifer Lien.
 
I'm not sure Discovery even knows what its concept is anymore. After powering through every episode of Season 4, I just left the season finale to internet summary for myself. Basic questions about why Tarka doesn't just ask the aliens to take him to the Nexus or whatever were glossed over past the point of rationality by this point. Saru and T'Rina was so cringeworthy that I felt like going back to Anakin and Padme's scenes in AOTC, and I thought you couldn't get worse than that.

And I'm sorry, but I'm just not a fan about what I heard about bringing Stacey Abrams in, and I'm a big supporter of her and her political party. I agree that Trek always was political, but there was always a degree of separation between real world events. We need to use the stories to show how certain views can be harmful but going straight to real world politicians and bringing them in seems more likely to drive away the other side rather than keep them engaged and open to change. I know if Giuliani showed up on Trek, I'd probably stop watching that show for good.
Wow, if Giuiliani showed on Trek, it would do completely the opposite for me.
 
I believe Giuiliani has already appeared in Trek.

skin-of-guliani.jpg
 
Then-Prince (now King) Abdullah of Jordan was on Voyager.



Actors can be exposed too. See, for instance, Stephen Collins, Andy Dick and Jennifer Lien.
Abdullah was really a walk on gimmick with no lines. He wasn't President of Earth like Abrams was.

And the latter instances of actors in crime is still worse than the political gimmick of bringing in a politician. If the actor is caught, then just recast or whatever. But a politician being caught doesn't just have that effect, it also undermines the entire message that was meant to be made even casting them to begin with.
 
I still don't know what Abrams specifically adds to Trek though that another black actress (Viola Davis? Lupita Nyongo? There are tons out there that I'm sure are eager to be in Trek) couldn't already bring to the table.

And with politicians, you just never know. If Abrams or any other politician suddenly was exposed for being involved in this or that crime (and this happens every other day with our politicians) suddenly her appearance has made the show feel outdated (and no, I'm not saying I believe Abrams is involved in anything, just using a hypothetical). Look how well all the past praise of Aung San Suu Kyi feels like now, for example.

IMO, Abrams represents the political values of Michelle Paradise and perhaps the other DISCO producers, and ones they think DISCO exemplifies or promotes. That's why including her made more sense than having a famous black actress cameo (even those as notable as Viola Davis or Lupita Nyong'o). It's about Abrams, but it's also not about Abrams. I guess I'm trying to say it's more about Abrams the visionary or her political vision more than the individual politician Abrams. Abrams as an idea, as shorthand for an inclusive, multiracial, intersectional political future. With Abrams' cameo, DISCO was making an explicit political statement (not about electoral politics), but more so their overall vision, which IMO they feel that Abrams also shares, and typifies.
 
Abdullah was really a walk on gimmick with no lines. He wasn't President of Earth like Abrams was.

And the latter instances of actors in crime is still worse than the political gimmick of bringing in a politician. If the actor is caught, then just recast or whatever. But a politician being caught doesn't just have that effect, it also undermines the entire message that was meant to be made even casting them to begin with.
Agreed!
 
Abdullah was really a walk on gimmick with no lines. He wasn't President of Earth like Abrams was.

And the latter instances of actors in crime is still worse than the political gimmick of bringing in a politician. If the actor is caught, then just recast or whatever. But a politician being caught doesn't just have that effect, it also undermines the entire message that was meant to be made even casting them to begin with.
How?

Like, I'm really struggling with this idea that if someone is caught in untoward or unfortunate scandal then all past fictional media tie in appearances are no longer relevant? Maybe this comes from my attitude of context because a show isn't written for the future but for the present. So I should take it in the spirt in which is presented in that moment, not arbitrarily condemning an episode for real world misdeeds that come to light later.
 
I struggle with The Motion Picture now. I can't watch a Kevin Spacey movie. It's a complicated subject.
I agree to a certain extent (thus my initial post saying that politicians on Trek isn't really a good idea) but the line has to be drawn somewhere to separate the art from the artist arguably we probably can't enjoy any of Trek. Although TOS actress Grace Lee Whitney never confirmed it, a lot of fans seem to suspect from the clues (that the suspect polished rocks, that he was a powerful executive on TOS) that it was Gene Roddenberry himself who raped her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top