A little over a year ago, I started this thread in the DSC forum:
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/should-i-give-discovery-another-chance.292885/
I asked if I should consider giving DSC another chance, having quit six episodes into Season One. Despite a litany of opinions on either side of the matter, I ultimately never revisited DSC. Whatever technical achievements the show has going for it, the storytelling felt very superficial. I wasn't invested in the characters or their stories the way I ideally should be.
So, what does that have to do with DS9?
Until last night (May 19th, as I write this), I had never seen an entire episode of DS9 beyond "Emissary". I distinctly remember watching it with my dad on the old TV in my parents' bedroom when it first aired in January 1993. I didn't remember anything about the plot other the opening scene at Wolf 359. I seem to recall liking it, but Dad and I didn't hang with the show. I remember years later catching part of Take Me Out to the Holosuite, while doing some chores. Until now, that was the extent of my DS9 viewing experience.
After being disappointed with DSC, I realized I still had an entirely new series to watch from the beginning. Admittedly, I wasn't sure about how much I would enjoy DS9, as my disappointment with DSC made me wonder if there was anything left in Star Trek worth finding.
Being only two episodes in, I can say that DS9 has managed to grab me in a way DSC had been at most partially successful after six episodes. The storytelling and the characterizations feel sharper; DS9 uses its' storytelling to make its' points, whereas DSC often felt like storytelling was sacrificed in order for the point to be made.
I plan to keep this thread ongoing, if only perhaps to record my own experience with a new (old) series that made me think Star Trek still had something to offer when DSC made me question that.
https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/should-i-give-discovery-another-chance.292885/
I asked if I should consider giving DSC another chance, having quit six episodes into Season One. Despite a litany of opinions on either side of the matter, I ultimately never revisited DSC. Whatever technical achievements the show has going for it, the storytelling felt very superficial. I wasn't invested in the characters or their stories the way I ideally should be.
So, what does that have to do with DS9?
Until last night (May 19th, as I write this), I had never seen an entire episode of DS9 beyond "Emissary". I distinctly remember watching it with my dad on the old TV in my parents' bedroom when it first aired in January 1993. I didn't remember anything about the plot other the opening scene at Wolf 359. I seem to recall liking it, but Dad and I didn't hang with the show. I remember years later catching part of Take Me Out to the Holosuite, while doing some chores. Until now, that was the extent of my DS9 viewing experience.
After being disappointed with DSC, I realized I still had an entirely new series to watch from the beginning. Admittedly, I wasn't sure about how much I would enjoy DS9, as my disappointment with DSC made me wonder if there was anything left in Star Trek worth finding.
Being only two episodes in, I can say that DS9 has managed to grab me in a way DSC had been at most partially successful after six episodes. The storytelling and the characterizations feel sharper; DS9 uses its' storytelling to make its' points, whereas DSC often felt like storytelling was sacrificed in order for the point to be made.
I plan to keep this thread ongoing, if only perhaps to record my own experience with a new (old) series that made me think Star Trek still had something to offer when DSC made me question that.
Last edited: