• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Fargo, Season 5. Bout darn time

That makes sense. I bet the family of that guy might sue the hospital for not providing necessary security to protects it's patients.

It would only be a civil matter. It would be hard to go after Dot, since she was committed to the hospital as a mental patient, and was able to escape. Both the kidnapping of the cancer patient, and the escape of Dot would be the fault of lax hospital security.
 
Dot could actually be someone who sues as well. As a hospital you can't just have a bunch of criminals roaming the halls trying and even successfully kidnapping people.
 
I think she would feel guilt as well for those reasons. For lots of things as well. Like not being able to stop Roy long ago. I bet she has some regrets for running away and hiding instead of trying to expose him before he had a chance to ruin all the lives he did. Guilt over Witt. Maybe it's that survivals guilt thing. She lives and not just lives but has a happy ending with a loving husband and daughter, while others where not so lucky when it came to dealing with Roy.

Despite all of the outer happiness I imagine their is lots of rage and depression and guilt on the inside, wanting to come out because of everything she has experienced and feelings like she could have done more to stop him before he ruined so many peoples lives.
 
The one issue though is she didn't just look away towards sexual abuse. There was also murdering involved. I am thinking that they might go harder towards her because of that. I guess it depends on just how much she knew. Did she know their were dead people buried in a pit not to far from the house. I'm sure that is something the cops will investigate.

Those are good points. I am not saying they'd necessarily let her off scot free, just that they might cut her a deal that they wouldn't necessarily cut for another accomplice to murder.

Speaking of arrests I wonder if even Dot might get charged for something by switching the name tags in the hospital that led to that one guy being kidnapped and killed because they thought he was Wayne. Would that be involuntary manslaughter?

Even if it were, I think Dot would have a decent defense of "justification/exigent circumstances."
 
It might come down to how good Karen's lawyer is I guess.

"My client grew up with a father who exerted coercive control over her before she married Roy Tillman who carried on the process. Roy Tillman who, let us not forget, murdered his first wife. Terrified not only for her own life but for the lives of her children my client felt she had no option but to submit to his will in all things."

As someone mentioned there's a clear case of Stockholm syndrome (which may or may not be an actual thing) to factor in as well
 
It's not "Stockholm Syndrome,", rather layers of trauma informing outlook and response.

Abused, degraded and traded by a father (learning that violence and intimidation generates results and instills fear in one's rivals) into the hands of a serial domestic abuser/murderer subjected to sexual violence, psychological torment and assault. Told repeatedly she is nothing more than a tool to create and bring up her husband's property, all the while knowing she was a replacement for the woman her husband actually wanted.

The only reasonable way to survive would be to capitulate, harden ones shell, follow the abusers pattern of violence and rhetoric to attempt to engender relief, and use the violence she'd seen to successfully deployed against herself and others to assert some modicum of control in her life.

She's a classic (and well executed) example if a victim of generational Coercive and Controlling Behaviour.

One need only look at the younger couple that Roy "counsels" to see how hard it is for victims of domestic abuse to speak/stand for themselves, with "outs" regularly only available when a 3rd party intervenes to remove the controlling party.

Hugo - brilliantly layered season overall
 
Finished this last night, thought the whole season was pretty good.

That character supposedly born in the middle ages, though. WTH was that all about? Just a bit of that Fargo weirdness that manages to creep in here and there, I guess. Why the hell did he wear a dress? (That wasn't a kilt.)
 
It was more of a combat kilt than a dress kilt, which I what one typically thinks of.

Heavier in weight/fabric, with fewer pleats, being more practical for warmth and sturdyness

Hugo - and highly faded tartan
 
That is the most unethical thing Dot did. She traded a stranger’s life for her husband’s life.

Legally? She didn’t shoot him. She assaulted him, knocking him out. Legally she’d be on the hook for that but she didn’t make Jon Hamm kill him. And all the survivors are emotionally on her side knowing what she went through. And she has a spiteful billionaire with a direct line to the most corrupt president in history on her side. She’ll be fine.
 
It was more of a combat kilt than a dress kilt, which I what one typically thinks of.

Heavier in weight/fabric, with fewer pleats, being more practical for warmth and sturdyness

Hugo - and highly faded tartan

I saw the entire character of Munch as a direct reference to Anton Chigirn from No Country. Especially the last scene. The entire season seemed designed to flip the script of existing Fargo/Coen mythology with some optimism, finally putting the universe on the side of the audience.

Dot got through to Munch in a way Llewelyn’s wife did not attempt to get through to Chigirn.
 
Even though I liked that for this season I hope they don't do it again. I want my dark Fargo cynicism back for the next season. :)
 
So what happened after Munch ate his forgiveness biscuit?

Did he suddenly age, wither, and collapse into dust as if he'd drunk from the wrong grail in Indiana Jones 3?
Did he begin to age normally, and will continue to walk the earth for what remains of a normal human lifespan?
Was he bodily assumed into heaven?
Did he ask for seconds?
Did he begin wearing pants?

Inquiring minds want to know.
 
That can only be answered in our head canon.:) I like to think nothing happened other than he now ages like most people and he started helping people get out of debt and trying to free them in the same way he was. I think it would be interesting if he started helping all the people who gets screwed over by Lorraine in her business. He still has a mission of sorts but a more positive one. Maybe he even finds away to free whatever demons Lorraine has on the inside, allowing her to become a better person.
 
So what happened after Munch ate his forgiveness biscuit?

Did he suddenly age, wither, and collapse into dust as if he'd drunk from the wrong grail in Indiana Jones 3?
Did he begin to age normally, and will continue to walk the earth for what remains of a normal human lifespan?
Was he bodily assumed into heaven?
Did he ask for seconds?
Did he begin wearing pants?

Inquiring minds want to know.
He gets a job selling Kias at Wayne's dealership. Hopefully with a good dental plan.
 
So what happened after Munch ate his forgiveness biscuit?

Did he suddenly age, wither, and collapse into dust as if he'd drunk from the wrong grail in Indiana Jones 3?
Did he begin to age normally, and will continue to walk the earth for what remains of a normal human lifespan?
Was he bodily assumed into heaven?
Did he ask for seconds?
Did he begin wearing pants?

Inquiring minds want to know.
We'll find out in the spinoff Munch, PI.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top