It's money for me. I AM a diehard of TNG and DS9, but have 3 kids (Trek fans!!) and it costs money to raise kids. I will end up buying all Trek that comes to Blu sooner or later---sooner if the price drops.
So if we add up just these available figures we get $7.7 million. Again that's without data for S2 & S5. If we assume those seasons did roughly what S4 did, that takes us to about $9 million. And again, these are only opening week figures in the U.S. and do not take into account worldwide figures or subsequent weeks of sales or the digital downloads sold on iTunes.![]()
If these numbers have any reality then I don't see what the problem is. From what I have heard the whole project cost around $9 million in the first place. Here we have figures telling us they made that money back just from the opening week sales of each season.
So there was a huge drop off in sales following season 1. Maybe that came as a disappointment to CBS that this wouldn't be the miracle cash cow they had hoped for. But hey, its still making good money if this is anything to go by and this will make money for some time to come surely? Is this a matter of unrealistic expectations on the side of CBS?
It's money for me. I AM a diehard of TNG and DS9, but have 3 kids (Trek fans!!) and it costs money to raise kids. I will end up buying all Trek that comes to Blu sooner or later---sooner if the price drops.
As a parent myself, I fell your pain on the $. May the prices drop soon for you, because watching Trek with my kids had been one of the many fun things of parenthood....I realize you know that already and have already gotten to do it a lot, I'm just wishing for more for you.
Those are only opening week numbers, and they don't account for how these sets have performed during the holidays, which is a major selling window for home video. Add to that the revenue earned from streaming the episodes on Amazon Prime, selling them on iTunes, and syndicating them on TV and I'd be shocked if CBS hadn't made their $9 million back already.
That doesn't make the project a huge success or mean that DS9 getting the same treatment is a sure thing, of course. Without seeing the internal numbers (never going to happen) all we can do is speculate. But in the black? Probably already there -- if the whole project only cost $9 million.
A big thanks to Maxwell Everett for these sale figure estimates.
But if CBS Home Entertainment is "just" in the black for TNG, doesn't that rather paint a black picture for DS9-R?
As we discussed / were uncertain earlier it's the amount of post-production CGI cleanup work DS9 was exposed to. I'd think that the fine people at CBS Digital, based on their learning experience with TNG-R, could remaster DS9 for less cost than TNG, but possibly would have a bigger workload remastering DS9 so they might end up with the same costs, still.
Thus, remastering DS9 would probably require the same sale figures TNG-R yielded.
Bob
If they are really not planning to go straight into DS9 S1 (or even Voyager S1) after TNG S7, I really don't think they'll ever "properly" do it. Restarting the pipeline after shutting it down means more time and training people up all over again.
Hell, if they were on the bubble, you'd think they'd do a "DS9: The Next Level" sampler between TNG S6 & 7 to get some sort of gauge while they still had some time to react. Judging from what FrontierTrek has said, I am now very pessimistic.
And I'm also intrigued by the "middle way"—the very generous selection of 78 or so episodes as listed by Bolty at blu-ray.com.
It seems that CBS is getting cold feet when looking at the massive cost of redoing all seven seasons of DS9.
And I'm also intrigued by the "middle way"—the very generous selection of 78 or so episodes as listed by Bolty at blu-ray.com.
I don't really see that as a viable option. Yes, in a literal sense it would be possible to make a cut down three-series "package" out of the seven actual series, but given that either way they'd need to track down all the stock footage, probably make new CGI models for DS9, the Defiant-class, the Jem'Hadar and Cardassian ships and any other relevant Starfleet ships (if "Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges" is on the list, you're committing to building a CGI Intrepid-class - i.e., Voyager - with no possibility of reuse!)... you're spending the money on all the fixed costs without fully amortising them. Penny-wise, pound-foolish.
It seems that CBS is getting cold feet when looking at the massive cost of redoing all seven seasons of DS9.
That is pure speculation. There seems to be a lot of had wringing over nothing at this point. We haven't even gotten Season Six of TNG yet, but now based on the fact that there has been no official announcement of DS9 on Blu-Ray you've decide CBS doesn't want to do it? It wasn't so long ago that people were saying TNG in HD would never happen because of the incredible amount of work it would take, and yet here we are almost at the end of the remastering process. I think we all need to take a step back and just breath a little and wait for something more than a vague tweet.
I'm also intrigued by the "middle way"—the very generous selection of 78 or so episodes as listed by Bolty at blu-ray.com.
It seems that CBS is getting cold feet when looking at the massive cost of redoing all seven seasons of DS9.
That is pure speculation. There seems to be a lot of had wringing over nothing at this point. We haven't even gotten Season Six of TNG yet, but now based on the fact that there has been no official announcement of DS9 on Blu-Ray you've decide CBS doesn't want to do it? It wasn't so long ago that people were saying TNG in HD would never happen because of the incredible amount of work it would take, and yet here we are almost at the end of the remastering process. I think we all need to take a step back and just breath a little and wait for something more than a vague tweet.
The "hand wringing" had nothing to do with the lack of an announcement of DS9--it was two posts by someone from Trekcore who has it on good authority that it probably won't be done. The person hasn't stated that it for sure isn't happening, but he's getting strong indications.
So this isn't a case of people just freaking out cause they haven't heard anything--it's a case of people being worried because they HAVE heard something.
Nothing wrong with keeping up the optimism though.
I feel the need to be a bit clearer about this as some fans have started to predict that DS9 could follow hot on the heals of TNG early next year. The reality is that getting such a project off the ground for a seamless transition from TNG is now VERY unlikely. There has been no green light, and with the speed things are moving, it is seeming increasingly likely that CBS Digital will wrap TNG and move on to other things by the time DS9 becomes any sort reality
....All he is saying is that DS9 is unlikely to happen directly after TNG. No more. No less.
Doesn't work like that. Firstly, all fixed ("sunk") costs would need to be paid, which wouldn't be trivial.I still think that if it costs XX dollars on average to do an episode, whatever that is, that doing 3/7ths of the whole show, about 40% of the best episodes, is likely to save CBS almost 60% of the cost compared to the whole show.
But if, only if, that's deemed a bridge to far and so not in the cards, rather than getting nothing of DS9 in HD, I think this selection does a nice job of it:
"Bolty" posted it at blu-ray.com:
What's still seems weird to me is this: DS9 is one of the best Treks made, in terms of writing, fx, sets, make-up, acting, etc. To make a show of this quality today would cost at least $3 million an episode, and probably more. Given that 176 episodes of DS9 were made, the show represents something like a half billion dollar investment. It probably made back all of that money from its original run, and from the DVD sales several years later. But still, they spent the equivalent of about $500 million dollars making one of the best science fiction shows ever—and now CBS can't come up the tiny fraction of that, whatever that is, to rebuilt it for HD?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.