The Old Mixer said:
aridas sofia said:
I never said he wasn't talking about the Enterprise.
Then neither one of us knows what you're talking about.
Cute. Trite, but cute.
For those that care, I said...
It doesn't say anything about Enterprise being a new ship. Enterprise might have been an old ship and been refit with the new "time barrier" breaking engines.
To which
The Old Mixer replied...
I'd say it's pretty obvious from context. Who's taking them back? And why would that officer be so enthusiastic about another ship? Plus, the "Time Warp Factor" terminology used in "The Cage" suggests that it's one of those "new ships" that have "broken the time barrier".
It's quite a sretch to assume that he wasn't talking about the Enterprise, IMO.
And in general, throughout the series, such a big deal is made of "Starships" in the Enterprise's limited class being the best ships available, top of the line...not aging vessels being made defunct by newer, better classes.
The line from "The Cage" is...
And you won't believe how fast you can get back. The time barrier’s been broken. Our new ships can--
What constitutes a "new" ship? Was the
Enterprise in
TMP a "new" ship after refitting? Decker specifically said she was "almost an entirely new
Enterprise." And what was at the heart of that contention? Scott says the ship has new engines. Never tried at warp power.
It was twenty-five years from the time Okuda says the ship was launched -- in 2245 -- to the
TMP refit -- in 2270. What prevents these people from doing that
twice? Twenty-five years before 2245 is 2220, and roughly forty years before Kirk took command. What if
that had been her original construction date? If the ship needs complete overhauls at 25 year intervals, she would have been
relaunched with
entirely new, up-to-date propulsion systems in 2245, and yet still have been 40 (ish) years old when Kirk took command. "The Cage" happens only a few years later.
Enterprise would still be "a new ship," certainly from the perspective of those castaways and arguably even from the perspective of her own crew.
Does this kind of story make sense? Well, look at all the old ships flying around in TNG. 100 year-old ships and more.
Excelsiors and
Mirandas and
Grissoms and... even refit
Constitutions. And what of the naval precedent being bandied about here? The aircraft carrier U.S.S.
Enterprise is... 47 years old. It had a major overhaul refit in 1990 -- at 30 years of age.
I'm not saying anyone needs to believe this. It obviously didn't make the grade with Okuda. But such an interpretation fits with
TMoST, the
Writers' Guide and the expressed intent of
Roddenberry during
TOS -- that the ship have some age and history behind it. It even fits with the notion that the ship was (re-) launched in 2245. It fits with current naval practice. And frankly, it is more interesting to consider more captains and crews on that ship than just the two before Kirk -- at least to me.