• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Did James Kirk command a ship before the Enterprise ?

^ Great point about Decatur, I'd never considered that before. Thanks for bringing it up.
 
The Old Mixer said:
^But from where do you derive that understanding? I can't think of a shred of onscreen evidence about the conditions under which he received either his promotion to the rank of Captain or his command of the Enterprise, other than the vague reference to Kirk having met Pike when he assumed command of the Enterprise.

It's an educated guess. Are we to assume that there are only 12 Constitution-class starships in the fleet, this particular one has heretofore been commanded by a captain (who is then promoted to fleet captain), and yet the guy taking over for him - "the youngest man ever to command a starship" - is not promoted to captain himself?

It seems more likely that he was than that he wasn't.
 
It is conceivable given the fact he is wearing two stripes that he is a commander in WNMHGB. Not likely, but conceivable.
 
aridas sofia said:
It is conceivable given the fact he is wearing two stripes that he is a commander in WNMHGB. Not likely, but conceivable.

Or that they hadn't gotten all the shirts back from the cleaner's. :lol: Or hadn't quite settled on the ranking stripes yet.
 
Why would the command of Enterprise be of such vital importance to him that he rhapsodizes about "never lose you...never" if she were just another ship under his command?

Because he had lost the previous command? :devil:

It seems rather implausible that Starfleet would hand over a "big deal" ship to a newcomer - unless one reasons that Starfleet might wish to send the most expendable captain for this risky mission of deep space exploration. Consider what would have happened if Kirk had succeeded in his first televised assignment: probing beyond the edge of the galaxy. For all we know, he would have kept on going for the next twenty years. A man, woman or other of greater seniority would have attained great senility by the end of such a mission...

Timo Saloniemi
 
aridas sofia said:
A beaker full of death said:
As I stated above, the creative forces behind TOS had served. They modeled the service they created on WWII (with heavy influence from aircraft carrier service in particular). The overarching spirit of the thing, of course, was derived from the Napoleonic navies. in both, one simply didn't get command of a capital ship without first commanding a lesser ship (usually as a lieutenant or Lt. Commander). It's only reasonable to read that into the Starfleet they created. Much of what they wrote was written not only by veterans, but FOR an audience of veterans, which is why so much is implied and didn't have to be spelled out.

Absolutely. It is important not to underestimate the influence of the 18th century Cook explorations AND the service of Stephen Decatur aboard the 1799 schooner Enterprize. As a 24 year old commander of Enterprize (rank: lieutenant) he led the attack in Tripolitan waters to burn the captured frigate Philadelphia. This Nelsonian feat immediately made Lieutenant Decatur a national hero. He was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain, and given command in October 1804 of one of the navy's premier frigates -- Constitution. He was only 25 years old.

At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.

Please don't forget that in those days you joined the Navy at the age of 12 or 13. So Decatur at 25 already had over 12 years of experience behind him when he was assigned to command Constitution.

Just putting things into perspective. ;)
 
garamet said:
The Old Mixer said:
^But from where do you derive that understanding? I can't think of a shred of onscreen evidence about the conditions under which he received either his promotion to the rank of Captain or his command of the Enterprise, other than the vague reference to Kirk having met Pike when he assumed command of the Enterprise.

It's an educated guess. Are we to assume that there are only 12 Constitution-class starships in the fleet, this particular one has heretofore been commanded by a captain (who is then promoted to fleet captain), and yet the guy taking over for him - "the youngest man ever to command a starship" - is not promoted to captain himself?

It seems more likely that he was than that he wasn't.
Now you're losing me. Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain. And if he had previously commanded a lesser ship, either he had already attained the rank of Captain, or he commanded that ship at the rank of Commander and was indeed promoted to Captain upon assuming command of the Enterprise. However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.
 
Duncan MacLeod said:
aridas sofia said:
A beaker full of death said:
As I stated above, the creative forces behind TOS had served. They modeled the service they created on WWII (with heavy influence from aircraft carrier service in particular). The overarching spirit of the thing, of course, was derived from the Napoleonic navies. in both, one simply didn't get command of a capital ship without first commanding a lesser ship (usually as a lieutenant or Lt. Commander). It's only reasonable to read that into the Starfleet they created. Much of what they wrote was written not only by veterans, but FOR an audience of veterans, which is why so much is implied and didn't have to be spelled out.

Absolutely. It is important not to underestimate the influence of the 18th century Cook explorations AND the service of Stephen Decatur aboard the 1799 schooner Enterprize. As a 24 year old commander of Enterprize (rank: lieutenant) he led the attack in Tripolitan waters to burn the captured frigate Philadelphia. This Nelsonian feat immediately made Lieutenant Decatur a national hero. He was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain, and given command in October 1804 of one of the navy's premier frigates -- Constitution. He was only 25 years old.

At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.

Please don't forget that in those days you joined the Navy at the age of 12 or 13. So Decatur at 25 already had over 12 years of experience behind him when he was assigned to command Constitution.

Just putting things into perspective. ;)

No need to point that out in this case. Decatur was appointed midshipman when he was 19. :) He only had six years in when handed Constitution.
 
BTW, HERE is an example of the command history of a WW2 USN heavy cruiser. As you can see, while the norm is for the CO to be of captain rank, commanders sometimes hold that position.
 
Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain.

Hey, I am. :)

There's no explicit reason to think that Kirk's cuff braid in "Where No Man" did not correlate to the rank of Commander. Indeed, having it do so would have several positive sides:

+ Kirk would be a bit less of a wunderkind.
+ We would have some reassurance that the folks doing Trek realize that rank and position are separate things.
+ We wouldn't have to assume that there were multiple rank braid scheme changes in the 2250s-2260s.

The downsides seem slight:

- Such a big ship to a mere Commander? But we don't know this ship class was Starfleet's biggest - and the Hornblowerish setting might actually indicate a lesser, frigate-style vessel that gets to do more interesting things than the big battlewagons.
- But other ships like her got high-ranking skippers, up to Commodore? Well, if she were a "frigate type", she'd also be a nice means to quick promotion, for grooming the skippers for command of bigger vessels.
- Kirk in the episode is never called Commander, only Captain. But that would hold true quite regardless of his rank.

However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.

And incidentally, there is no evidence that Pike handed him the keys to the ship. Indeed, Kirk and Pike last met when the latter was promoted. If this happened before the handover ceremony of the Enterprise, Pike can't have been the one handing her over. OTOH, if Kirk got the ship just before the first aired adventure, there wouldn't have been much time for the two to meet after the handover. Kirk was out there exploring, Pike was back home playing with cadets.

That is, there is no evidence either way: Pike might or mightn't have been the previous commander. Not that this would be pertinent to the subject matter, but the issue did pop up earlier in the thread...

Timo Saloniemi
 
And next, Timo will expound on his theory that Pike was a lieutenant when he commanded the Enterprise, and the ship herself was a sagging old rust bucket. :rolleyes:

I'm sorry, Timo. But you've been pushing this idea for about as long as I can remember and I'm tired of hearing it. :brickwall:
 
The Old Mixer said:
Now you're losing me. Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain. And if he had previously commanded a lesser ship, either he had already attained the rank of Captain, or he commanded that ship at the rank of Commander and was indeed promoted to Captain upon assuming command of the Enterprise. However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.

That's the fun part of TOS. It was interactive long before its time. The fans are free to fill in whatever they want in the backstory.

Unless, of course, the new movie says otherwise. But then we still get to decide whether STXI fits into our own personal canon.
 
Duncan MacLeod said:
And next, Timo will expound on his theory that Pike was a lieutenant when he commanded the Enterprise, and the ship herself was a sagging old rust bucket. :rolleyes:

I'm sorry, Timo. But you've been pushing this idea for about as long as I can remember and I'm tired of hearing it. :brickwall:

It is a TNG-era retooling that the Enterprise was launched in 2245. Per the original TMoST it was forty years old by the time of Kirk's five-year mission, and based on what was shown had obviously been refit between Pike's and Kirk's tenure. It frankly adds a bit of color to her past to imagine Enterprise with such a long and storied history, and makes sense that she was an expendable ship being specially refit for a dangerous deep space mission.

Even so, the notion of even an old heavy cruiser being commanded by a lieutenant is a bit of a stretch.
 
Agreed. Especially in the earlier decades and generations of Starfleet history when you had a much smaller talent pool of command officers to choose from and fewer ships to spare. I doubt a lowly lieutenant would ever get anything like a heavy, top-of-the-line cruiser unless he or she took over temporary command in an emergency or battle.
 
The "Where No Man Has Gone Before" uniform "braids" are more like solid rings, and we didn't see any broken ones on anybody...so I just take it that in the early uniform, they didn't have enough cuff variations to account for all of the ranks that wound up being used on the show. Also, wasn't Mitchell specifically said to be a Lt. Cmdr., but had one solid ring? That would indicate that the scheme does not directly correspond to the later braid scheme.

I can't buy that the Enterprise was supposed to be 40 years old at the time of the 5-year mission because of onscreen evidence/implication. In the flashback portion of "The Menagerie", which is supposed to take place what, 11 years before the episode, they encounter what appear to be people who have been stranded for about 20 years, and one of the officers refers to the Enterprise as one of their "new ships".
 
In the flashback portion of "The Menagerie", which is supposed to take place what, 11 years before the episode, they encounter what appear to be people who have been stranded for about 20 years, and one of the officers refers to the Enterprise as one of their "new ships".

No... the line is --

And you won't believe how fast you can get back. The time barrier’s been broken. Our new ships can--

It doesn't say anything about Enterprise being a new ship. Enterprise might have been an old ship and been refit with the new "time barrier" breaking engines.
 
aridas sofia said:
[Stephen Decatur] was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain [...]
Not so. Decatur being promoted to captain over seven senior officers caused some controversy and plenty of grumbling in the young service. One very promising young lieutenant, Andrew Sterett (Decatur's predecessor as CO of Enterprise and victor of the first ship-to-ship fight in the Barbary campaign), resigned over the issue. And he had a valid complaint: Decatur's promotion was explicitly a reward for the Philadelphia mission, not necessarily because he was better suited to commanding a frigate than some of his peers. Unfortunately for Sterret and others, a more effective way of rewarding valor in the form of prestigious decorations was many decades away.

At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.

Of course, Cook's career would appear much slower moving: He served almost 11 years as a master (navigation warrant officer) before being commissioned as a lieutenant at 39, then commander at 42 and captain at 44 following his successful voyages.

Decatur was appointed midshipman when he was 19. He only had six years in when handed Constitution.

Although his "hero promotion" was exceptional, in the USN of the Quasi-War through War of 1812 period the average age upon promotion to captain was 33, still young by today's standards, with an average 14 years of service. John Rodgers and William Bainbridge both made CAPT at age 26, in 1799 and 1800 respectively. [Rodgers' was also a "hero promotion" for being first lieutenant of Constellation in her victory over Insurgente, but he was the number two lieutenant in the navy at the time and the grade of commander had been temporarily eliminated, so he was close to being a captain anyway.] But it should be remembered, the USN was only a few years old at the time and the higher leadership structure was still somewhat fluid as officers' capabilities (or weaknesses) were realized and command relationships were established. As the service aged and became more professionally solid, the age for promotion to captain went up.

BTW, HERE is an example of the command history of a WW2 USN heavy cruiser. As you can see, while the norm is for the CO to be of captain rank, commanders sometimes hold that position.

But the CDRs are clearly exceptions, cruiser command was firmly established as a captain's billet. The last in the example list was during the ship's decommissioning, no doubt to supervise that process at the navy yard. CDR McElduff, CO for only one month, is most likely a temporary arrangement, as in the case of a sudden vacancy. The same is probably true for Joseph Redman, though he held command for over five months. And Redman was a quite senior commander: he made captain July 1, 1940, a little over a month after commanding the cruiser.

Although I personally prefer to stick with TMoST's version of Kirk commanding "the equivalent of a destroyer-size spaceship" before E., there isn't much to go by onscreen, and you could probably make a decent case for 1701 being his first command. He is clearly young for his rank, his classmates in "Court Martial" are still lieutenants. With long exploratory voyages, Kirk may not have had time for another command, but if he served as an XO on a particularly dangerous, demanding or successful cruise he may have been judged to have sufficient experience to move into a cruiser CO's billet as a junior CAPT.

--Justin
 
aridas sofia said:
No... the line is --

And you won't believe how fast you can get back. The time barrier’s been broken. Our new ships can--

It doesn't say anything about Enterprise being a new ship. Enterprise might have been an old ship and been refit with the new "time barrier" breaking engines.
I'd say it's pretty obvious from context. Who's taking them back? And why would that officer be so enthusiastic about another ship? Plus, the "Time Warp Factor" terminology used in "The Cage" suggests that it's one of those "new ships" that have "broken the time barrier".

It's quite a sretch to assume that he wasn't talking about the Enterprise, IMO.

And in general, throughout the series, such a big deal is made of "Starships" in the Enterprise's limited class being the best ships available, top of the line...not aging vessels being made defunct by newer, better classes.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top