The Old Mixer said:
^But from where do you derive that understanding? I can't think of a shred of onscreen evidence about the conditions under which he received either his promotion to the rank of Captain or his command of the Enterprise, other than the vague reference to Kirk having met Pike when he assumed command of the Enterprise.
aridas sofia said:
It is conceivable given the fact he is wearing two stripes that he is a commander in WNMHGB. Not likely, but conceivable.
Why would the command of Enterprise be of such vital importance to him that he rhapsodizes about "never lose you...never" if she were just another ship under his command?
aridas sofia said:
A beaker full of death said:
As I stated above, the creative forces behind TOS had served. They modeled the service they created on WWII (with heavy influence from aircraft carrier service in particular). The overarching spirit of the thing, of course, was derived from the Napoleonic navies. in both, one simply didn't get command of a capital ship without first commanding a lesser ship (usually as a lieutenant or Lt. Commander). It's only reasonable to read that into the Starfleet they created. Much of what they wrote was written not only by veterans, but FOR an audience of veterans, which is why so much is implied and didn't have to be spelled out.
Absolutely. It is important not to underestimate the influence of the 18th century Cook explorations AND the service of Stephen Decatur aboard the 1799 schooner Enterprize. As a 24 year old commander of Enterprize (rank: lieutenant) he led the attack in Tripolitan waters to burn the captured frigate Philadelphia. This Nelsonian feat immediately made Lieutenant Decatur a national hero. He was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain, and given command in October 1804 of one of the navy's premier frigates -- Constitution. He was only 25 years old.
At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.
Now you're losing me. Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain. And if he had previously commanded a lesser ship, either he had already attained the rank of Captain, or he commanded that ship at the rank of Commander and was indeed promoted to Captain upon assuming command of the Enterprise. However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.garamet said:
The Old Mixer said:
^But from where do you derive that understanding? I can't think of a shred of onscreen evidence about the conditions under which he received either his promotion to the rank of Captain or his command of the Enterprise, other than the vague reference to Kirk having met Pike when he assumed command of the Enterprise.
It's an educated guess. Are we to assume that there are only 12 Constitution-class starships in the fleet, this particular one has heretofore been commanded by a captain (who is then promoted to fleet captain), and yet the guy taking over for him - "the youngest man ever to command a starship" - is not promoted to captain himself?
It seems more likely that he was than that he wasn't.
Duncan MacLeod said:
aridas sofia said:
A beaker full of death said:
As I stated above, the creative forces behind TOS had served. They modeled the service they created on WWII (with heavy influence from aircraft carrier service in particular). The overarching spirit of the thing, of course, was derived from the Napoleonic navies. in both, one simply didn't get command of a capital ship without first commanding a lesser ship (usually as a lieutenant or Lt. Commander). It's only reasonable to read that into the Starfleet they created. Much of what they wrote was written not only by veterans, but FOR an audience of veterans, which is why so much is implied and didn't have to be spelled out.
Absolutely. It is important not to underestimate the influence of the 18th century Cook explorations AND the service of Stephen Decatur aboard the 1799 schooner Enterprize. As a 24 year old commander of Enterprize (rank: lieutenant) he led the attack in Tripolitan waters to burn the captured frigate Philadelphia. This Nelsonian feat immediately made Lieutenant Decatur a national hero. He was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain, and given command in October 1804 of one of the navy's premier frigates -- Constitution. He was only 25 years old.
At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.
Please don't forget that in those days you joined the Navy at the age of 12 or 13. So Decatur at 25 already had over 12 years of experience behind him when he was assigned to command Constitution.
Just putting things into perspective.![]()
Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain.
However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.
The Old Mixer said:
Now you're losing me. Nobody is arguing that Kirk assumed command of Enterprise at less than the rank of Captain. And if he had previously commanded a lesser ship, either he had already attained the rank of Captain, or he commanded that ship at the rank of Commander and was indeed promoted to Captain upon assuming command of the Enterprise. However, there is no onscreen evidence that Enterprise was his first command, nor even that he was the youngest Captain (starship or otherwise) in Starfleet.
Duncan MacLeod said:
And next, Timo will expound on his theory that Pike was a lieutenant when he commanded the Enterprise, and the ship herself was a sagging old rust bucket.
I'm sorry, Timo. But you've been pushing this idea for about as long as I can remember and I'm tired of hearing it.![]()
In the flashback portion of "The Menagerie", which is supposed to take place what, 11 years before the episode, they encounter what appear to be people who have been stranded for about 20 years, and one of the officers refers to the Enterprise as one of their "new ships".
And you won't believe how fast you can get back. The time barrier’s been broken. Our new ships can--
Not so. Decatur being promoted to captain over seven senior officers caused some controversy and plenty of grumbling in the young service. One very promising young lieutenant, Andrew Sterett (Decatur's predecessor as CO of Enterprise and victor of the first ship-to-ship fight in the Barbary campaign), resigned over the issue. And he had a valid complaint: Decatur's promotion was explicitly a reward for the Philadelphia mission, not necessarily because he was better suited to commanding a frigate than some of his peers. Unfortunately for Sterret and others, a more effective way of rewarding valor in the form of prestigious decorations was many decades away.aridas sofia said:
[Stephen Decatur] was promoted -- with the consent of the officers over whose heads he was raised -- to post captain [...]
At that time a commanding officer led his landing and boarding parties. It wasn't unusual to see a man earn the rank of captain by 30 years of age. Decatur's experience beginning on Enterprize was extraordinary, but not without parallel. And taken with Cook's explorations, I believe it forms the basis for the Kirk character. From the perspective of the people creating him, the example of Cook and the young Decatur seemed more apropos to a descendant of 1960's astronauts than that of a middle aged WW2 cruiser commander.
Decatur was appointed midshipman when he was 19. He only had six years in when handed Constitution.
BTW, HERE is an example of the command history of a WW2 USN heavy cruiser. As you can see, while the norm is for the CO to be of captain rank, commanders sometimes hold that position.
I'd say it's pretty obvious from context. Who's taking them back? And why would that officer be so enthusiastic about another ship? Plus, the "Time Warp Factor" terminology used in "The Cage" suggests that it's one of those "new ships" that have "broken the time barrier".aridas sofia said:
No... the line is --
And you won't believe how fast you can get back. The time barrier’s been broken. Our new ships can--
It doesn't say anything about Enterprise being a new ship. Enterprise might have been an old ship and been refit with the new "time barrier" breaking engines.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.