• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Consolidated Trailer Thread

Grade the trailer


  • Total voters
    197
I gave the trailer an "a". Why? It did what it was supposed to do; made me very interested in seeing the show which is what it's supposed to do.

I rarely give A+s unless something just blows me away.

I'm not into being critical of the trailer as I realize that it's bits and pieces and that things may not be as they seem once you see the actual product.

But I'm looking forward to the premiere.
 
Something clicked on me earlier in regards to the trailer - a lot of comments I've seen have said "Oh, it's action!" but.... I don't see action. I see a lot of talking. As said above, it's bits and pieces and not quite representative.... but not one phaser was fired, not one torpedo spread, not one explosion.... it actually seemed more tense with the only real hint of violence being the swing/hinted space-confrontation.

Maybe it's wishful thinking - but I can't see this being an action show with that amount of dialogue or character scene picked over bangy shooty shoots.
 
Something clicked on me earlier in regards to the trailer - a lot of comments I've seen have said "Oh, it's action!" but.... I don't see action. I see a lot of talking. As said above, it's bits and pieces and not quite representative.... but not one phaser was fired, not one torpedo spread, not one explosion.... it actually seemed more tense with the only real hint of violence being the swing/hinted space-confrontation.

Maybe it's wishful thinking - but I can't see this being an action show with that amount of dialogue or character scene picked over bangy shooty shoots.
This is very true. There's little action depicted at all, in the fighty bitey smashy sense. In fact, what we have are conflicts and discussions on the bridge about how to solve a problem - just like TOS used to do, and a spacesuit trip to explore the unknown, the thing everyone says they want Trek to do. The quick cuts and dramatic music give a sense of action, true, but what's actually happening on screen is, at most, an implied battle.
 
.... but not one phaser was fired, not one torpedo spread, not one explosion....
Actually, you can hear something pretty much like the classic TOS photon torpedo sound effect as there's an explosion flash through the bridge view plate. That's immediately after a graphic that says "PHOTON TORPEDO TARGET LOCKED," which is just after the argument about firing first. Start at 1:47/2:24 on the American CBS trailer.
 
This is very true. There's little action depicted at all, in the fighty bitey smashy sense. In fact, what we have are conflicts and discussions on the bridge about how to solve a problem - just like TOS used to do, and a spacesuit trip to explore the unknown, the thing everyone says they want Trek to do. The quick cuts and dramatic music give a sense of action, true, but what's actually happening on screen is, at most, an implied battle.

Indeed! Personally I think it's all perception -same as the many "JJ style" comments. It's not JJ style - it's 2017 style. I don't see much different in theme, just looks.

Actually, you can hear something pretty much like the classic TOS photon torpedo sound effect as there's an explosion flash through the bridge view plate. That's immediately after a graphic that says "PHOTON TORPEDO TARGET LOCKED," which is just after the argument about firing first. Start at 1:47/2:24 on the American CBS trailer.

BAH! I'd forgotten about that. Ok, since I sit corrected, maybe disregard the torpedo bit :p But rewatching on my other monitor, it's intriguingly not very focused on or actiony. That torpedo shot could be absolutely anything - the torpedo lock in itself is the same - tension over direct action.

Going back to before we saw anything, we had a comment about Balance of Terror or Undiscoverd Country as a touchstone - two things that weren't built on action, but tension. That's what I see here and I find it utterly fascinating.
 
Something clicked on me earlier in regards to the trailer - a lot of comments I've seen have said "Oh, it's action!" but.... I don't see action. I see a lot of talking. As said above, it's bits and pieces and not quite representative.... but not one phaser was fired, not one torpedo spread, not one explosion.... it actually seemed more tense with the only real hint of violence being the swing/hinted space-confrontation.

Maybe it's wishful thinking - but I can't see this being an action show with that amount of dialogue or character scene picked over bangy shooty shoots.

True, but the FX shots come last. So we don't know the final ratio of dialogue to pew-pew.
 
Indeed! Personally I think it's all perception -same as the many "JJ style" comments. It's not JJ style - it's 2017 style. I don't see much different in theme, just looks.



BAH! I'd forgotten about that. Ok, since I sit corrected, maybe disregard the torpedo bit :p But rewatching on my other monitor, it's intriguingly not very focused on or actiony. That torpedo shot could be absolutely anything - the torpedo lock in itself is the same - tension over direct action.

Going back to before we saw anything, we had a comment about Balance of Terror or Undiscoverd Country as a touchstone - two things that weren't built on action, but tension. That's what I see here and I find it utterly fascinating.
I've been looking for the influence of Nicholas Meyer, the king of Horatio Hornblower Meets Submarine Movie In Space and perhaps that's where it will appear - dramatic tension rather than the overt fighting and action set pieces of JJTrek?
 
True, but the FX shots come last. So we don't know the final ratio of dialogue to pew-pew.

I can see them holding back some key moments/scenes - but I imagine they'd prioritise effects that they wanted to show off in trailers, so they'd get completed first. If they didn't finish any action they might be trying to keep it under wraps - or they just didn't want to focus on it.

It's an odd one as there are multiple variables on that front..

I've been looking for the influence of Nicholas Meyer, the king of Horatio Hornblower Meets Submarine Movie In Space and perhaps that's where it will appear - dramatic tension rather than the overt fighting and action set pieces of JJTrek?

I sincerely hope so. not just becaus eI've liked his Trek work - but.... thats just bloody good television, especially for binge watching!
 
I can see them holding back some key moments/scenes

We know for a fact they're holding things back as we have yet to see the final reveal of the tweaked Discovery, just a blurry and fuzzy version of it in the poster.

Plus, principal shooting isn't nearly over yet, is it? I think they are taking what they have and rushing a trailer out to quell rumors the show is turning into a train-wreck.
 
Plus, principal shooting isn't nearly over yet, is it? I think they are taking what they have and rushing a trailer out to quell rumors the show is turning into a train-wreck.
It's long done on the pilot, they are about five episodes in.
They're producing a trailer because this was their showcase for the fall shows, I doubt rumours of the sky falling have even made their way to CBS, as they're pretty much just fans reading way too much into things.
 
What does it matter how an individual decides to interpret the material? I'm treating it as a reboot of the whole kit-and-kaboodle.

Which is wise. It's not as if Discovery, if it makes it to season 7, will suddenly start looking like Where No Man has Gone Before ot TOS. It'll evolve along it's own visual path and likely not even consider the narrative side of things.


RE: The trailer and it's "action." I was actually quite pleased we weren't hit over the head with starship porn and shooty-mc-shoot. There will be action, for sure... But there's been an idea, particularly with the Klingons of this era, to do a Cuban Missile Crisis type of story... Methinks that's what this is gonna be like. A huge political nightmare with rising tensions, some gunboat diplomacy and a whole lot of white knuckling.

And I think we all know that Klingon's respect a show of strength, which is likely what #1 is driving at in the trailer.
 
Which is wise. It's not as if Discovery, if it makes it to season 7, will suddenly start looking like Where No Man has Gone Before ot TOS. It'll evolve along it's own visual path and likely not even consider the narrative side of things.

If it makes it several seasons and is hugely popular, I can see Captain Burnham handing off the USS Enterprise to James T. Kirk, as they remake TOS. But, because someone behind the scenes said it, it will still be the "Prime" timeline.
 
I think Burnham is at least part Vulcan (or Romulan). Pictures:

Vulcans_zpsimrh6ttj.jpg


PartVulcan_zps8wdmz6pl.jpg

OMG, she does look possibly Vulcan. Or she cuts her hair to look Vulcanian. Amazing.
 
If there is a link to Sarek in all likely hood it'll be that he either helped raise her or during her time in Starfleet he became a type of mentor for her. I don't think they are related in any way.
 
If there is a link to Sarek in all likely hood it'll be that he either helped raise her or during her time in Starfleet he became a type of mentor for her. I don't think they are related in any way.

I'm of the same thought - seems more of a Pike/Kirk relationship (Kelvin timeline, of course) than anything deeper. But thats froma few seconds of footage so clearly just guesswork.
 
If there is a link to Sarek in all likely hood it'll be that he either helped raise her or during her time in Starfleet he became a type of mentor for her. I don't think they are related in any way.
I'm inclined to agree. Perhaps even recommending her to Starfleet Academy.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top