• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Canon, Continuity, and Pike's Accident

The real question for me is how does this change impact the stories. Is there really any difference between the Eugenics Wars happening in 1992 or 2042 in the terms of story? Are the plots of Space Seed or TWOK altered by that change? Is Khan different. Is his fate somehow altered? Are the events as we know them changed? How about the actions of Kirk and crew? Is here any impact on future stories? I say no. The dates are irrelevant to the story. Chosen because they are/were in out future. Now those dates are are past. So yes, lets move these fictional events up the time. When other dates cross from future into past do the same. Story over "data points".
 
The real question for me is how does this change impact the stories. Is there really any difference between the Eugenics Wars happening in 1992 or 2042 in the terms of story? Are the plots of Space Seed or TWOK altered by that change? Is Khan different. Is his fate somehow altered? Are the events as we know them changed? How about the actions of Kirk and crew? Is here any impact on future stories? I say no. The dates are irrelevant to the story. Chosen because they are/were in out future. Now those dates are are past. So yes, lets move these fictional events up the time. When other dates cross from future into past do the same. Story over "data points".
Yep.
 
They recast the role. That's all the thinking required.

That's the production reason man.

It's fine to speculate on the in-universe logic of the timeline being shifted and what may have changed.

They've set themselves up for that with this episode, whether intentionally or not.
 
It's fine to speculate on the in-universe logic of the timeline being shifted and what may have changed.

They've set themselves up for that with this episode, whether intentionally or not.
Doylist vs Watsonian perspectives in fandom are, again, nothing new. Especially Star Trek with it's chronologies, encyclopedias, technical manuals, wikis...

I've come to the realization that the "real" toxic fans are the ones that enjoy that other fans are upset about changes to long-standing Star Trek canon.
 
I've come to the realization that the "real" toxic fans are the ones that enjoy that other fans are upset about changes to long-standing Star Trek canon.
I don't enjoy that you get upset over precieved changes to canon. I simply don't care.

That said....

I will say that the overly pedantic side of the fandom is about as annoying and cliche as it gets. They suck all the air out of the room with their obsessiveness over precieved issues.

So I suppose I can admit to enjoying when the "True Fans" aren't being catered too as much as they'd like.
 
Last edited:
I don't enjoy that you get upset over precieved changes to canon. I simply don't care.

That said....

I will say that the overly pandantic side of the fandom is about as annoying and cliche as it gets. They suck all the air out of the room with their obsessiveness over precieved issues.

So I suppose I can admit to enjoying when the "True Fans" aren't being catered too as much as they'd like.

Yep.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top