Yeah, that was a good one, too.I liked Ash catching the keys with his face. Stupid and juvenile but made me laugh.

He does indeed. That was one of the things that was so depressing about Fisher's death. Underneath her law-enforcement demeanor and her drive to avenge her partner, she had the humor to appreciate Ash and actually responded to his silly come ons. Then she was gone.Ash deserves some happiness.
You're right, and this is something creators frequently have to deal with. How do you evolve a character without losing the appeal of the character or violating the nature of the character as a literary device? The classic example I always use is Ben Grimm from the Fantastic Four. Readers love the character because they are touched by his plight and they want him to be able to control his change into the Thing so that he can find love and happiness-- but if he did so, he would lose that tragic appeal. Basically, with some characters, they can only find happiness at the end of their story, if even then.That's the crux of the matter. Yes, he deserves happiness, but odds are, he'll never attain it. If he did, we'd lose a cornerstone of his basic character and a basic premise of the property would crumble. He's a blue collar Sisyphus forever doomed trying to roll the boulder up the hill only to have it crush him time and time again. If he ever found that happiness, it would only last because he's finally vanquished evil and that would pretty much conclude his "story".
Sorry, that got a bit more serious than I intended for this morbidly goofball material, but I hope you know what I mean.