• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers 31st/32nd Century Ships Revealed

I watched "All Is Possible". We get a good look at the 32c era shuttle. It appears ovoid, with airliner-like wraparound windows at the front, and what appears to be sheet-shaped detached nacelles?
Until Eaglemoss releases the model, I'll be using my Orville shuttle as a stand-in.
 
I watched "All Is Possible". We get a good look at the 32c era shuttle. It appears ovoid, with airliner-like wraparound windows at the front, and what appears to be sheet-shaped detached nacelles?
Until Eaglemoss releases the model, I'll be using my Orville shuttle as a stand-in.

Have to admit my first thought was "that looks a bit Orville".
 
Have to admit my first thought was "that looks a bit Orville".
Its because most ships on Orville and Disco are just the current generic "that's what future looks like design". Anything in Orville could easily be called a bit Mass Effect or a bit Galaxy Quest and all of them look like concept electric cars. White, wavey and roundy is just the de jour "future look"
 
I watched "All Is Possible". We get a good look at the 32c era shuttle. It appears ovoid, with airliner-like wraparound windows at the front, and what appears to be sheet-shaped detached nacelles?
Until Eaglemoss releases the model, I'll be using my Orville shuttle as a stand-in.
Was thinking the same. It’s like the art direction all of the 32nd century is fully channeling the Orvilleverse.
 
Not the first time this has happened. The temporal agent from last season, had a TNG movie era badge in the preview, but it was edited to a TNG series badge in the final episode.

It’s not the first time with Discovery, and it’s not the first show to do so either.

I’ll always remember the preview for TNG S04E08 Future Imperfect, Riker pronounced the word “charade” “charahd,” instead of with the more common pronunciation in an American accent with a long a sound, but in the finished episode it wasn’t “charahd,” any longer.

As a kid my brothers and ‪‪I joked that Patrick Stewart must have told Frakes to watch himself, because that was *his* way to pronounce charade, and only his.
 
Its because most ships on Orville and Disco are just the current generic "that's what future looks like design". Anything in Orville could easily be called a bit Mass Effect or a bit Galaxy Quest and all of them look like concept electric cars. White, wavey and roundy is just the de jour "future look"
I was just glad the shuttle didn't look like another Eaves McNugget.
 
I just don't get what Eaves' fascination is with big open segments cut out of saucer sections. It makes no sense in terms of making efficient use of available space and weakens the overall structure, and if it's just done for the kewl factor, it's not really anything impressive looking. I guess if you're really jonesing for some Krispy Kremes or something.

I mean, a saucer itself is already not a very efficient use of available space, but fine, it's the Trek standard/tradition, and it's nicer looking than a big fat sphere or cube, and you can make the argument that it presents a smaller target profile. But then you go and poke giant holes in that saucer and turn it into a hula hoop...
 
Last edited:
I mean, a saucer itself is already not a very efficient use of available space, but fine, it's the Trek standard/tradition, and it's nicer looking than a big fat sphere or cube. But then you go and poke giant holes in that saucer and turn it into a hula hoop...
I mean, it is Christmas time. I also want a plane that loop de loop's.
 
I just don't get what Eaves' fascination is with big open segments cut out of saucer sections. It makes no sense in terms of making efficient use of available space and weakens the overall structure, and if it's just done for the kewl factor, it's not really anything impressive looking. I guess if you're really jonesing for some Krispy Kremes or something.

I mean, a saucer itself is already not a very efficient use of available space, but fine, it's the Trek standard/tradition, and it's nicer looking than a big fat sphere or cube, and you can make the argument that it presents a smaller target profile. But then you go and poke giant holes in that saucer and turn it into a hula hoop...

Yes, I do find Eaves's fascination with "negative space" to be... idiosyncratic at best, shall we say? And downright bad design at worst. Thank god he reigned it in for the Enterprise-E. He still had to do it for the reimagined Constitution-class though didn't he... :rolleyes:
 
Did he design that ship?
Eaves designed the DSC Connie yes. We've known this since Season 1 lol

He still had to do it for the reimagined Constitution-class though didn't he... :rolleyes:
The producers also have final say in the designs so they must have liked those holes in the pylons, they also had the FX team modify his design after he submitted the final one so we know they don't just stick with the final designs. Eaves also didn't design any of the 32nd Century designs so don't blame him for any of the negative space there, as he hasn't worked on Discovery since Season 1.

There is concept art of the Discovery without the negative space in the saucer, but allegedly the higher ups preferred it.

Also none of his other Discovery Starfleet designs have negative space (other than the Connie's pylons), nor do his designs in Picard.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top